• Coolest/Ugliest Weapons V5 - Bullpup AKs are the best
    14,930 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Jagur;43335254]So unfloding the stock completely changes your view on the gun?[/QUOTE] That's my entire point. Yes. Yes it does. Only a moron would use the gun with the stock folded, but visually, it's a lot more mean looking.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;43335390]Glocks have more [b]felt[/b] recoil because they're not cheap poorly designed pieces of shit with bulky slides that weigh 6 pounds. If your main reason for preferring a piece of shit gang banger pistol over a glock is recoil, then you really need to rethink your priorities when it comes to firearms.[/QUOTE] The whole gun doesn't even weigh half that. You've obviously never fired one and are going just by looks. C9s are quality designed with easy parts. I also do not like Glocks because they are too light, not as durable as a C9, more parts, less trigger pull for faster fire. C9's are ideal for home and personal carry defenses. I wouldn't enter a contest with one since it's a personal firearm instead of a sport firearm. The C9 9mm has more pros over cons then any 9mm Glock I've fired, but it all comes down to what the user likes. I will take my C9 and you can take your mock attitude and go play with what you like. Glocks are gang banger pistols btw. Speaking of shit: [IMG]http://coltrevolver.umwblogs.org/files/2009/04/pepperbox.jpg[/IMG]
You've literally have no clue what you're talking about. I'm certain that you have never shot a glock or even see one outside of a video game.
[QUOTE=Riller;43332787]And now, the many faces of Uzi. Awesome: [t]http://www.imfdb.org/images/4/4c/Uzi.jpg[/t] Cool: [t]http://www.imfdb.org/images/2/2b/MiniUzi_01.jpg[/t] Eh: [t]http://www.imfdb.org/images/6/6b/Uzi-1.jpg[/t] What are you doing?! [t]http://www.imfdb.org/images/2/22/MicroUziPistolStock.jpg[/t] Oh god make it stop! [t]http://www.imfdb.org/images/f/fd/Uzi_old_stock.jpg[/t][/QUOTE] nope [t]http://static.giantbomb.com/uploads/original/1/14440/1283976-spring_uzi_jpg.jpg[/t] takticool [t]http://www.shootingillustrated.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/IW_UZI_PRO_with_-mepro_21-2smaller.jpg[/t] what? [t]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_7TXVxF-MO18/TGa0_rzelNI/AAAAAAAAAHI/bRhPVyK-Qq0/s1600/MPA930SST+best.jpg[/t] uzicraft?! [t]http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2011/241/a/e/uzi_isometric_view_by_thug_inc-d487op5.gif[/t]
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;43335523]You've literally have no clue what you're talking about. I'm certain that you have never shot a glock or even see one outside of a video game.[/QUOTE] Pot calling the kettle black, shut up and have a Chauchat. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/bAGSBXf.jpg[/IMG] Fun fact: This variant of the Chauchat was reasonably well-liked and reliable in the field; despite being the one everyone makes jokes about. The French half-moon magged ones were alright, it was the American banana-magged ones that shat the bed.
[QUOTE=Riller;43335571]Fun fact: This variant of the Chauchat was reasonably well-liked and reliable in the field; despite being the one everyone makes jokes about. The French half-moon magged ones were alright, it was the American banana-magged ones that shat the bed.[/QUOTE] It's a shame, too, because the American Chauchat looks a little better [IMG]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/machine/mg76/csrg_1918_1.jpg[/IMG]
no it was the french half-mooned mags that jammed because springs don't like to push stuff in a circle and they were open to the trench mud, they were ment to have a piece of glass there but they were in a hurry to produce them they just didn't put it in the american banana mags helped a lot because they were closed but i think there was a problem with the spring in them too
[QUOTE=Sableye;43335545]nope [t]http://static.giantbomb.com/uploads/original/1/14440/1283976-spring_uzi_jpg.jpg[/t] takticool [t]http://www.shootingillustrated.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/IW_UZI_PRO_with_-mepro_21-2smaller.jpg[/t] what? [t]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_7TXVxF-MO18/TGa0_rzelNI/AAAAAAAAAHI/bRhPVyK-Qq0/s1600/MPA930SST+best.jpg[/t] uzicraft?! [t]http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2011/241/a/e/uzi_isometric_view_by_thug_inc-d487op5.gif[/t][/QUOTE] [IMG]http://i-hls.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/IWI-UZI-PRO-Pistol_5623.jpg?193942[/IMG]
[t]http://i.minus.com/iOSY1CJIEcQYd.JPG[/t]
[QUOTE=Sableye;43335611]no it was the french half-mooned mags that jammed because springs don't like to push stuff in a circle and they were open to the trench mud, they were ment to have a piece of glass there but they were in a hurry to produce them they just didn't put it in the american banana mags helped a lot because they were closed[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]See, there are two types of Chauchat light machine gun out there. You almost always see the standard French M1915 gun, with its distinctive half-moon magazine. That gun had a few early manufacturing problems (all resolved by the end of 1916), and was actually a decent gun crippled by terrible magazines and a hellish combat zone. [/QUOTE] [QUOTE]The real contender for Worst Gun Ever is the US M1918 Chauchat redesigned for the .30-06 cartridge. Development and production were rushed, and a large number of guns went out the door with incorrectly sized chambers. [/QUOTE] The French Chauchat had mag issues. The American Chauchat was not chambered for the round it was chambered for.
anti-personal uzi [t]https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQUeSs7LewNaBH0VqmYY-qHkNXYqFzks2c-KuAW3u8IufxRbr_rMA[/t]
Also, German captured Chauchat in 7.92 [IMG]http://www.forgottenweapons.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/GermanChauchat.jpg[/IMG] :v:
[QUOTE=Riller;43335652]The French Chauchat had mag issues. The American Chauchat was not chambered for the round it was chambered for.[/QUOTE] ya thats what i thought there was a problem with the american chauchat but the french one wasn't without serious faults too
[QUOTE=Sableye;43335678]ya thats what i thought there was a problem with the american chauchat but the french one wasn't without serious faults too[/QUOTE] The french one was, for it's time, a decent LMG. Clearly not as good as the [I]in every way most excellent and absolutely perfect Madsen[/I] or the quite a lot heavier Lewis, but it served it's purpose quite well. The American one hardly ever saw combat because units would trade them in for either French ones, or regular Springfield 1903s before they ever got to the frontlines.
[img]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/machine/mg64/madsen_1948_denmark.jpg[/img] it'd be perfect if the mag wasn't on top heh
[img]http://24.media.tumblr.com/5c31e25744b34c3e3b2dbc4c10a1214e/tumblr_mg2ahgwLII1rj1jdbo1_500.jpg[/img] Vulcans are p rad
[QUOTE=Saza;43335847][img]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/machine/mg64/madsen_1948_denmark.jpg[/img] it'd be perfect if the mag wasn't on top heh[/QUOTE] Yeah try going prone with a mag that size on the bottom.
[QUOTE=lolz3;43335622][IMG]http://i-hls.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/IWI-UZI-PRO-Pistol_5623.jpg?193942[/IMG][/QUOTE] My forefinger feels endangered just looking at it.
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5636656/m79-2.jpg[/img] [img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5636656/Vietnam-Weapons-22.jpg[/img] THUNK
[QUOTE=Saza;43335847][img]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/machine/mg64/madsen_1948_denmark.jpg[/img] it'd be perfect if the mag wasn't on top heh[/QUOTE] [img]http://puu.sh/61wTJ.png[/img]
Every time I see a hornet's nest (the red, blunt one) shell, I come back to this one idea... [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1f/M-32_Grenade_Launcher.jpg/800px-M-32_Grenade_Launcher.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/qaFEaH4.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fe/.22LR_ratshot.jpg/509px-.22LR_ratshot.jpg[/IMG]
I remember someone called that idea the "sandblaster" or something. I love it.
[QUOTE=Rents;43336040][img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5636656/m79-2.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] that thing has the funkiest stock
[QUOTE=Riller;43336137]Every time I see a hornet's nest (the red, blunt one) shell, I come back to this one idea... [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1f/M-32_Grenade_Launcher.jpg/800px-M-32_Grenade_Launcher.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/qaFEaH4.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fe/.22LR_ratshot.jpg/509px-.22LR_ratshot.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] You would have trouble killing rats with something like that. Those shot shells don't even have enough power behind them to cycle a semiautomatic .22lr rifle.
great! less lethal it is
[QUOTE=Riller;43333719]So, in my idle browsings of the internets and stuff, I was reminded of this thing... [IMG]http://www.deactivated-guns.co.uk/images/uploads/0a1apm63/0A1APM63-035947_6.jpg[/IMG] Polish PM-63 RAK. It's... Uh. Special. 9x18mm open-bolt blowback automatic. However, as opposed to the Uzi I mentioned above; which is also a 9mm blowback open-bolt automatic, it uh... Kinda have a slide. Like a pistol. Now, can anyone tell me what a pistol with an open bolt looks like? Yes, Billy? That's right. Like this. Which means the first picture I showed you of the PM63 was, in fact, not really in a ready-to-fire position. This is how that'd look: [IMG]http://www.weapon.ge/images/391_2.jpg[/IMG] Yep. When you pull the trigger, the slide shoots forwards like when you flick the slide-release of a regular handgun, chambering a round, firing it, then locking back again. Can't imagine that being good for stability, even when compared to other open-bolt designs.[/QUOTE] I had read all about that thing on forgottenweapons... Oh god what a piece of shit... They couldn't get the magazines to feed properly because they were using an outdated , proven inferior design. Had to add a rate reducer once they modified it because the bolt didn't weigh enough. That "spoon" like thing in front of the barrel is both a shitty compensator and what you press on to charge the weapon. Naturally in a blowback weapon, you can see where that would go horribly wrong if something slipped. Stocks were shit, they usually tossed them. RAK means cancer and its designer died of it...irony?
[QUOTE=Sableye;43335545]uzicraft?! [t]http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2011/241/a/e/uzi_isometric_view_by_thug_inc-d487op5.gif[/t][/QUOTE] Looks like the Voxel Uzi model from Shadow Warrior Classic
[QUOTE=Sableye;43335545]nope uzicraft?! [t]http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2011/241/a/e/uzi_isometric_view_by_thug_inc-d487op5.gif[/t][/QUOTE] Woah, a gif with transparency? Is this really a thing??
[QUOTE=lolz3;43335461]Glocks are gang banger pistols btw. [/QUOTE] Glocks aren't "Gang Banger" guns, they're used by criminals. Top 10 guns used in crime in 2000 per the BATF 1. Smith and Wesson .38 revolver 2. Ruger 9 mm semiautomatic 3. Lorcin Engineering .380 semiautomatic 4. Raven Arms .25 semiautomatic 5. Mossberg 12 gauge shotgun 6. Smith and Wesson 9mm semiautomatic 7. Smith and Wesson .357 revolver 8. Bryco Arms 9mm semiautomatic 9. Bryco Arms .380 semiautomatic 10. Davis Industries .380 semiautomatic Top 10 guns of 85 most recently seized used in crime in one city in 2012 Ruger-9 Smith and Wesson-6 Glock-5 Hi Point-5 Beretta-4 Lorcin-4 Remington-4 Raven-3 Jennings-3 IntraTec-3 Norinco-3
[img]https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/1538923_789443304415604_1712334979_n.jpg[/img]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.