Coolest/Ugliest Weapons V5 - Bullpup AKs are the best - General

i wonder if it are hundreds or thousands of mis-takes where he misses.

[QUOTE=NeoSeeker;40226833]i wonder if it are hundreds or thousands of mis-takes where he misses.[/QUOTE] None. Because nothing resists the spike. Even fate.

[QUOTE=NeoSeeker;40226833]i wonder if it are hundreds or thousands of mis-takes where he misses.[/QUOTE] I doubt he had to do any extra takes Lynn Thompson is actually kind of a badass [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKI1xmtf5Ck[/media]

[QUOTE=Skyward;40226743][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhknaG9ifbs[/media] [h2]THERE'S NO RESISTING THE SPIKE[/h2][/QUOTE] Jesus, are they actually trying to cater to mall ninjas? What a ridiculous marketing gimmick

[QUOTE=ksenior;40226924]Jesus, are they actually trying to cater to mall ninjas? What a ridiculous marketing gimmick[/QUOTE] Honestly I think that the people who probably buy the majority of those types of things are historical re-enactors.

[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c9/Zastava_CZ99.JPG[/t] It looks a bit flashy, but it looks nice.

[QUOTE=Skyward;40226743][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhknaG9ifbs[/media] [h2]THERE'S NO RESISTING THE SPIKE[/h2][/QUOTE] I bet this guy would win if he went back in time, and fought a knight

[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;40220830]hows aboot some early cold war air power? [img]http://www.daveswarbirds.com/usplanes/photos/p-80.jpg[/img] [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9b/Production_P-80s_af.jpg[/img] [/QUOTE] Those are awesome [t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/af/DF-ST-89-09964.jpg[/t] I was working at a local airport building a hanger while on a construction crew and they had a t-33 on display. Many lunches were eaten in the shade underneath it.

[QUOTE=Crash15;40228958]I bet this guy would win if he went back in time, and fought a knight[/QUOTE] Funny joke.

[QUOTE=asteroidrules;40225755]Well, since we were at least recently showing Kel-tec stuff, I thought I should show this one again: [img]http://www.imfdb.org/images/f/f9/Kel-Tec_RFB_Carbine.jpg[/img] The Rifle, Forward ejecting, Bullpup, or RFB for short. It's more or less the lovechild of the FAL and the F2000, which technically means it's the result of father-daughter incest, but still a pretty neat rifle.[/QUOTE] mildly reminds me of the DMR from halo reach.

[QUOTE=JDB;40229069]Those are awesome [t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/af/DF-ST-89-09964.jpg[/t] I was working at a local airport building a hanger while on a construction crew and they had a t-33 on display. Many lunches were eaten in the shade underneath it.[/QUOTE] ones I posted are YP-80's :v: I once ate lunch under a B-25 before it took off. I had the chance to ride in it too, but the pilot wanted 125$ per person to take a short flight in it.

I ate a hotdog underneath a B-52 at an airshow, does that count

[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b4/JO-LO-AR_%28.380_ACP%29_-_right.jpg[/t] Admit it. If this thing had a vagina you would fuck it silly.

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;40231912][t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b4/JO-LO-AR_%28.380_ACP%29_-_right.jpg[/t] Admit it. If this thing had a vagina you would fuck it silly.[/QUOTE] 93BR?

[QUOTE=Raijin;40232134]93BR?[/QUOTE] It's called a JO.LO.AR Guess why it's named that

[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/ba/Joloar_ad.jpg[/img] Only in spain does a break action 9mm make sense in the 1920's.

I feel like I'm the only person in the world who likes the MG-34 more than the MG-42 [img]http://www.gunpics.net/german/mg34/mg34_right1.JPG[/img] [img]http://desertwar.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/German-soldiers-with-an-MG-34-in-France-1944..jpg[/img]

MG-34 is cool but the MG-42 is superior in just about every way.

Are there any miniguns ever made? Literally like a minigun made for some soldier to equip in battle. [editline]10th April 2013[/editline] But never probably used or anything.

[t]http://desertwar.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/German-soldiers-with-an-MG-34-in-France-1944..jpg[/t] "Hans they're coming start shooting" "But Kurtz, she's so adorable just look at her firing pin"

[QUOTE=Gekkosan;40232447]Are there any miniguns ever made? Literally like a minigun made for some soldier to equip in battle. [editline]10th April 2013[/editline] But never probably used or anything.[/QUOTE] If I'm interpreting this question correctly, none have ever been given to infantry to carry into combat.

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;40232246]It's called a JO.LO.AR Guess why it's named that[/QUOTE] Jou Only Live Once Assault Rifle

[QUOTE=Gekkosan;40232447]Are there any miniguns ever made? Literally like a minigun made for some soldier to equip in battle. [editline]10th April 2013[/editline] But never probably used or anything.[/QUOTE] Recoil is too high, ammo is too heavy, gun is too heavy and it is of questionable useability by ground forces since LMG's would do just as well while being ligther and much more ammo conservative. That's why they dont use them.

[QUOTE=Zeneros;40232665]Recoil is too high, ammo is too heavy, gun is too heavy and it is of questionable useability by ground forces since LMG's would do just as well while being ligther and much more ammo conservative. That's why they dont use them.[/QUOTE] I don't know about recoil being an issue [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d84r8gMGxFQ[/media] yeah FPSRussia and all but still that wannabe-slav is still able to fire it without getting knocked on his ass.

[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;40232761]I don't know about recoil being an issue [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d84r8gMGxFQ[/media] yeah FPSRussia and all but still that wannabe-slav is still able to fire it without getting knocked on his ass.[/QUOTE] He obviously fires it at a lower RPM We still have the thing about the gun not having any usefulness for ground forces. That's why we dont even mount miniguns to tanks and APC's

can you cook pork on the barrel i want to cook pork on the barrel

I'm not saying that miniguns are practical infantry weapons, cause they blatantly aren't. They'd pretty much make whoever is carrying them massive targets, like flamethrower infantry in the Pacific during WWII. I'm just sayin that a minigun is wieldable by infantry, and recoil isn't an issue. [editline]10th April 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Joazzz;40232928]can you cook pork on the barrel i want to cook pork on the barrel[/QUOTE] Nope but you can make pankcakes on a Panzer [img]http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lsv6bprC2L1qc0pn9o1_500.jpg[/img]

I always laugh when I watch Predator with Blaine carrying that huge ass minigun in the jungle.

[QUOTE=Zanpa;40232644]Jou Only Live Once Assault Rifle[/QUOTE] Named after the designer J. Lopez de Arnaiz

[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;40232761]I don't know about recoil being an issue yeah FPSRussia and all but still that wannabe-slav is still able to fire it without getting knocked on his ass.[/QUOTE] I am 99% sure he is firing blanks at least when he's holding it. Consider that the gun FPSRussia is firing is somewhere between 2,000RPM and 6,000RPM, and is firing 7.62x51mm. For comparison, this is someone firing an MG-42, which is comparable (slightly hotter) ammunition at just 1,200RPM: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XctelR8MCVI[/media] The guy has to fire in short bursts and it can be seen noticeably recoiling. FPSRussia doesn't even brace himself, he's just swinging it around with no recoil or movement at all. Even if you just look at the physics involved, at 2,000RPM the gun should be applying 264 Newtons of force as recoil, which is the same force as having a 60lb weight sitting on your chest. For comparison, the MG-42 fired on full auto applies 192N of recoil force. Also, the US [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microgun"]experimented with[/URL] a handheld minigun, and found it to be impractical due to size and weight. Multi-barreled weapons are built because the rate of fire is too high for a single barrel, but for infantry weapons it's total overkill. Besides, it doesn't matter if you can stand the recoil if it exhausts all your ammo in a few seconds.