Coolest/Ugliest Weapons V5 - Bullpup AKs are the best - General

Magpul's A-Team van (VW Bus) for operating in anti-hippie operations: [img]https://scontent-b-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/q71/s720x720/10259862_737600289617803_4205872307956865570_n.jpg[/img]

[QUOTE=11meister;44643848]Not sure how I feel about posting actual firefights, but I suppose its relevant. Have a pretty neat pov video of a very nice CETME. Battle rifles be stronk ^_^ [video=youtube;4o-4x339pDA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o-4x339pDA[/video] Why can't more games be like this <-<[/QUOTE] Gah the way he repositions his hand after every couple of shots is super satisfying and I don't know why I wish stuff like that was in more videogames, I love to see minute details

[QUOTE=Leo Leonardo;44646617]Gah the way he repositions his hand after every couple of shots is super satisfying and I don't know why I wish stuff like that was in more videogames, I love to see minute details[/QUOTE] BF3 had a little hand position shifting when idle or moving around in prone. I swear it made tears of happiness splash on to my keyboard everytime I saw it. Too bad the hit detection, or lack thereof killed all my enjoyment in that game. I'm actually trying to put little fidgets and stance adjustments into my New Vegas character animations at the moment. Its actually pretty tricky getting convincing unconscious little movements like that.

[QUOTE=MAC21500;44646481]Magpul's A-Team van (VW Bus) for operating in anti-hippie operations: [img]https://scontent-b-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/q71/s720x720/10259862_737600289617803_4205872307956865570_n.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] i feel like thats something nixon would greenlight to secretly infiltrate and decimate hippy communes except that minigun wasn't invented till after vietnam

[QUOTE=Sableye;44650078]i feel like thats something nixon would greenlight to secretly infiltrate and decimate hippy communes except that minigun wasn't invented till after vietnam[/QUOTE] Erm, its made in 1963 [img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/20/HH-3-minigun-vietnam-19681710.jpg[/img_thumb] [QUOTE]A U.S. Air Force rotary-wing crewman fires a minigun during the Vietnam War. [/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=croguy;44633571]As much as the Lahti's design looks kick-ass due to the sled bipod and the fact that it comes in a fully-automatic mode, the sheer weight made it much more impractical in comparison to the RT-20, which is ~1/3rd of the Lahti's weight [i]and[/i] is also recoilless thanks to that gigantic exhaust pipe. The issue with the RT-20, though, is that, well... [IMG]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/sniper/sn56/rt20_1.jpg[/IMG] It probably set this guys ass on fire. Go figure.[/QUOTE] Yeah pretty much, the RT is much lighter, less bulky, and lighter kicking provided you clear your backblast, the Lahti was big, heavy, and hard recoiling. Although in the Lahti's defense it was developed in the late 1930s, and between the 5-10 round magazines and the capacity for full-auto it was actually a somewhat effective anti-aircraft rifle. Provided you can find/build soldiers with enough diamond in their skeletons to withstand the recoil of firing that thing in bursts.

[IMG]http://tulatoz.ru/upload/iblock/0e3/0e3c0a9c7742d0aacf9293717dc082cf.jpg[/IMG] TOZ-106 Shotgun

[QUOTE=kaine123;44651138][IMG]http://tulatoz.ru/upload/iblock/0e3/0e3c0a9c7742d0aacf9293717dc082cf.jpg[/IMG] TOZ-106 Shotgun[/QUOTE] I looked at this and thought that it doesn't look that bad then i saw the bolt

[QUOTE=Sableye;44650078]i feel like thats something nixon would greenlight to secretly infiltrate and decimate hippy communes except that minigun wasn't invented till after vietnam[/QUOTE] Yup, here is the back of the bus: [img]https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/t1.0-9/p480x480/10258137_669681413099289_6940919398620117191_n.jpg[/img]

[QUOTE=MAC21500;44651808]Yup, here is the back of the bus: [img]https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/t1.0-9/p480x480/10258137_669681413099289_6940919398620117191_n.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] Is that a trailer? Because VW's don't look like that at the back.

[QUOTE=MAC21500;44651808]Yup, here is the back of the bus: [img]https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/t1.0-9/p480x480/10258137_669681413099289_6940919398620117191_n.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] That's a completely different bus. An old greyhound or something. Look at the windows.

[QUOTE=MAC21500;44651808]Yup, here is the back of the bus: [img]https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/t1.0-9/p480x480/10258137_669681413099289_6940919398620117191_n.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] Which serves to remind us that magpul shotgun furniture is neat. [t]http://www.rem870.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/magpul_mossberg_shotgun_forend_stock.jpg[/t] It has a bit more of an aggressive angle on the grip-part of the stock, compared to most other full-stock shotguns. Also, SBS. [t]http://i.imgur.com/5diA2.jpg[/t]

[QUOTE=QuickShot;44651235]I looked at this and thought that it doesn't look that bad then i saw the bolt[/QUOTE] I actually like that kind of bolt handle, thank you very much.

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/YVhn5To.png[/IMG] More moe Magpul shotgun. Had to shift through literal thousands of pictures of Magpulled out weapons to find this cutie-patootie, so enjoy. [editline]26th April 2014[/editline] And also a MOE stock on adapter. [IMG]http://stickman.rainierarms.com/galleries/Magpul%20III/IMG_9556%201028%20Stick.jpg[/IMG] Because in-line adapters are sexy, m'kay?

[QUOTE=Ignhelper;44650582]Erm, its made in 1963 [img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/20/HH-3-minigun-vietnam-19681710.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] miniguns and miniguns, but the bus one is a newer version

[QUOTE=Riller;44652182][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/YVhn5To.png[/IMG] More moe Magpul shotgun. Had to shift through literal thousands of pictures of Magpulled out weapons to find this cutie-patootie, so enjoy. [editline]26th April 2014[/editline] And also a MOE stock on adapter. [IMG]http://stickman.rainierarms.com/galleries/Magpul%20III/IMG_9556%201028%20Stick.jpg[/IMG] Because in-line adapters are sexy, m'kay?[/QUOTE] Fucken Riller always hitting my buttons. Related: [video=youtube;q0K4Vpp6UFI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0K4Vpp6UFI[/video]

More sexy in-line stock... [IMG]http://standupforamerica.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/pimped-out-1422-barrel.gif[/IMG] Some less-sexy out-of-line stock... [IMG]http://www.tactical-life.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/nighthawk1.gif[/IMG] And some absolutely horrid angled-stock. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/2hueoC7.png[/IMG]

snip bad reading

[QUOTE=kaine123;44653790][IMG]http://www.thesixtyeight.com/images/renders/dayz_m43.jpg[/IMG] Can anyone identify this handguard?[/QUOTE] [img]http://cdn.magpul.com/images/uploads/14_343_popup.jpg[/img] [url=http://store.magpul.com/product/MAG440/62]Magpul MOE[/url] Think it's the carbine length version, looks like the stock and grip are both MOE as well.

[QUOTE=asteroidrules;44653805][img]http://cdn.magpul.com/images/uploads/14_343_popup.jpg[/img] [url=http://store.magpul.com/product/MAG440/62]Magpul MOE[/url] Think it's the carbine length version, looks like the stock and grip are both MOE as well.[/QUOTE] Speaking of moe... [IMG]https://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m-551-dvic348.jpg[/IMG] M551 Sheridan light recon tank, air droppable. It was eventually taken out of service because it received too much damage to the turret in peace-time from grandmothers and aunts pinching it's adorable lil' cheeks.

Also it was retired because it sucked and everything broke, and the 155mm gun would fuck up the calibration on the targeting system for the ATGMs when it fired and you'd have to recalibrate it after each shot if you actually wanted to hit anything with the missiles. Still my favorite light tank though, would use to remove charlie 10/10. [t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/9988278/tanks/sheridanz/1376830624155.jpg[/t] [t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/9988278/tanks/sheridanz/1376827899282.jpg[/t] [t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/9988278/tanks/sheridanz/1374813604989.jpg[/t] [t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/9988278/tanks/sheridanz/1354932963926.jpg[/t] All my favorite armored vehicles aren't actually very good.

[QUOTE=Riller;44654886]Speaking of moe... [IMG]https://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m-551-dvic348.jpg[/IMG] M551 Sheridan light recon tank, air droppable. It was eventually taken out of service because it received too much damage to the turret in peace-time from grandmothers and aunts pinching it's adorable lil' cheeks.[/QUOTE] also because its shillelagh missile was never actually fielded against any real tanks, its gun was pathetically underpowered and relied completely on being able to take down tanks with its missile-round combo. fortunatly it was fieled ontime for vietnam where most of the fighting was perfectly suited for it [editline]27th April 2014[/editline] wanna talk about useless spending of the 80,000 or so missiles produced, only a few dozen ever actually were used to take out a target, and none were ever tank kills

I loved using the Sheridan in World in Conflict.

[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/58/MGM-51.jpg/800px-MGM-51.jpg[/t] SHILLELAGH MISSILE!!!! dat name

[QUOTE=Sableye;44655085]also because its shillelagh missile was never actually fielded against any real tanks, its gun was pathetically underpowered and relied completely on being able to take down tanks with its missile-round combo. fortunatly it was fieled ontime for vietnam where most of the fighting was perfectly suited for it [editline]27th April 2014[/editline] wanna talk about useless spending [B]of the 80,000 or so missiles produced, only a few dozen ever actually were used to take out a target, [/B]and none were ever tank kills[/QUOTE] That's called having 78,000 missiles to dick around with after the war, not useless spending.

[QUOTE=Sableye;44655085] wanna talk about useless spending of the 80,000 or so missiles produced, only a few dozen ever actually were used to take out a target, and none were ever tank kills[/QUOTE] Pretty sure it would have been super useful spending if the U.S. ever fought a tank-war in the Sheridan's lifetime. ATGMs are infinitely better at taking out tanks than shells are.

[QUOTE=asteroidrules;44653805][img]http://cdn.magpul.com/images/uploads/14_343_popup.jpg[/img] [url=http://store.magpul.com/product/MAG440/62]Magpul MOE[/url] Think it's the carbine length version, looks like the stock and grip are both MOE as well.[/QUOTE] Really if you're gonna play, "let's ID the parts" at least pick something that's not almost as obvious as the stock gear, like these two handguards: [img]http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/536769_545482325465484_219621523_n.jpg[/img] [img]http://cdn2.armslist.com/sites/armslist/uploads/posts/2011/06/08/146674_02_r_a_r_guns_grim_reaper_ar15_640.jpg[/img] Try figuring out what these handguards are.

[QUOTE=kaine123;44653790] Can anyone identify this handguard?[/QUOTE] Whats really funny is it says "[I][U]BUIS and MAGPUL stock models were partially created by Bohemia interactive[/U][/I]" at the bottom of the picture.

[QUOTE=11meister;44655995]Whats really funny is it says "[I][U]BUIS and MAGPUL stock models were partially created by Bohemia interactive[/U][/I]" at the bottom of the picture.[/QUOTE] yes presumably because some of the models are created by freelancers

[QUOTE=asteroidrules;44655884]Really if you're gonna play, "let's ID the parts" at least pick something that's not almost as obvious as the stock gear, like these two handguards: [img]http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/536769_545482325465484_219621523_n.jpg[/img] [img]http://cdn2.armslist.com/sites/armslist/uploads/posts/2011/06/08/146674_02_r_a_r_guns_grim_reaper_ar15_640.jpg[/img] Try figuring out what these handguards are.[/QUOTE] Those are going to bug the shit out of me now, because I've seen them both before and can't remember their names.