Coolest/Ugliest Weapons V5 - Bullpup AKs are the best - General

[IMG]http://www.acemodel.com.ua/pages/models/72412/aml_60.jpg[/IMG] The littlest artillery vehicle, AML-60. Mounting a 60mm mortar and being cheaper-than-dirt, combined with Fance's willingness to sell arms to literally anyone has made it quite popular in African armies, where the 90mm gun version makes an amazing tank-destroyer given it's speed and hefty armament. The mortar carrying variant has made an amazing anti-infantry weapon in the Wargame games. And it's adorbs.

Not sure if it's been posted in the 240+ pages, but I love the AW50. [img]http://blog.cheaperthandirt.com//wp-content/uploads/2010/04/AW50.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.firearmsworld.net/britain/ai/aw/ukfcsa-1.jpg[/img]

[QUOTE=11meister;44655995]Whats really funny is it says "[I][U]BUIS and MAGPUL stock models were partially created by Bohemia interactive[/U][/I]" at the bottom of the picture.[/QUOTE] You know that BUIS stands for Back up Iron Sights right?

[img]http://truthaboutguns-zippykid.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/630x417xDSC_3518-900x596.jpg.pagespeed.ic.g1OcQDOdTT.webp[/img] [editline]27th April 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=arthuro12;44656964]You know that BUIS stands for Back up Iron Sights right?[/QUOTE] No, they're those markers that float in the water. :V

[QUOTE=MAC21500;44656381]Those are going to bug the shit out of me now, because I've seen them both before and can't remember their names.[/QUOTE] I can tell ya if you want, but I'd like to see a few more guesses before posting it here.

[QUOTE=Riller;44655597]Pretty sure it would have been super useful spending if the U.S. ever fought a tank-war in the Sheridan's lifetime. ATGMs are infinitely better at taking out tanks than shells are.[/QUOTE] the tanks could only carry 8 rounds total if they went out with missiles, and the complicated riffling system was actually cracking barrels, also the TOW missile was just far better

[QUOTE=asteroidrules;44655884]Really if you're gonna play, "let's ID the parts" at least pick something that's not almost as obvious as the stock gear, like these two handguards: [img]http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/536769_545482325465484_219621523_n.jpg[/img] [img]http://cdn2.armslist.com/sites/armslist/uploads/posts/2011/06/08/146674_02_r_a_r_guns_grim_reaper_ar15_640.jpg[/img] Try figuring out what these handguards are.[/QUOTE] Top one is a Troy FMHGIG, "Fuck, my handguard is gross!", named for how it gets after mere minutes of use due to the soft rubber padding. Bottom is a CMMG Comfymatron 2000, the only thing to fit your hand better than your own dick.

[QUOTE=Riller;44656531][t]http://www.acemodel.com.ua/pages/models/72412/aml_60.jpg[/t] The littlest artillery vehicle, AML-60. Mounting a 60mm mortar and being cheaper-than-dirt, combined with Fance's willingness to sell arms to literally anyone has made it quite popular in African armies, where the 90mm gun version makes an amazing tank-destroyer given it's speed and hefty armament. The mortar carrying variant has made an amazing anti-infantry weapon in the Wargame games. And it's adorbs.[/QUOTE] Damn, I love those fucking things in Wargame.

[QUOTE=Riller;44659528] Bottom is a CMMG Comfymatron 2000, the only thing to fit your hand better [del] than your own dick. [/del] [I][B]than your own dick, favourite strap-on, or other regional equivalent.[/B][/I] [/QUOTE] Fixed that for ya. Been watching some more Lindybeige and it occurs to me. Why don't we have crossbows with magazines by now? Also: [img]http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr145/whitehouse_2008/Centerfire%20Rifle/008-2.jpg[/img] Dunno how good it actually is, but it looks the part. [img_thumb]http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr145/whitehouse_2008/Centerfire%20Rifle/003-6.jpg[/img_thumb]

[QUOTE=11meister;44660082]Been watching some more Lindybeige and it occurs to me. Why don't we have crossbows with magazines by now? [/QUOTE] Mostly because we do. [IMG]http://www.arrowmania.de/bilder/pfeilewerfer/repeating-crossbow.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.brlsi.org/sites/all/files/chinese_crossbow.jpg[/IMG]

Time for some ugly weapons: [img]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/smg/brazil/1305701233.jpg[/img] Taurus MT-9 G2 [img]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/smg/brazil/1287829775.jpg[/img] Mekanika URU Brazil strong!

I kind of want to see an M4 with a FAL handguard. [editline]27th April 2014[/editline] [IMG]http://rusknife.com/uploads/monthly_08_2010/post-167-000889600%201282409957.jpg[/IMG] KM 2000 Knife

Let's talk about missed opportunities. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zG9LlHcX8lg[/media]

[QUOTE=kaine123;44662778]I kind of want to see an M4 with a FAL handguard. [editline]27th April 2014[/editline] [IMG]http://rusknife.com/uploads/monthly_08_2010/post-167-000889600%201282409957.jpg[/IMG] KM 2000 Knife[/QUOTE] oh my god I want this so bad this is amazing

[QUOTE=Trekintosh;44663832]Let's talk about missed opportunities.[/QUOTE] Some great ideas there, shame they were never truly realised. Though no small jet will ever be sexier in my eyes than this: [img_thumb]http://www.tantopergioco.it/wp-content/gallery/me-262/Me-262_10.JPG[/img_thumb] [img_thumb]http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/shared/media/photodb/photos/070306-F-1234S-011.jpg[/img_thumb] [img_thumb]http://www.aircraftaces.com/photos/me-262-2.jpg[/img_thumb] The jumo powerplants needed full overhauls after only roughtly 4-7 sorties or a sum total of 24 realistic operational hours - but as they were all made from ferrites instead of the alloys and stainless they'd been designed for, short life span is somewhat to be expected, though the plane could actually be, and was flown with a single engine. I used to wish someone would make a civilian reproduction, there is a group that's built a few modern repro's for musems and aviation societies, so maybe its not a complete pipe dream: [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Me_262_Project[/url]

My love for the hawker hunter knows no bounds. It's just so graceful and purposeful. No fancy bits, just a simple and sleek jet fighter. The way the cockpit connects to a spine which runs seamlessly into the tail plane and the intakes embedded in the wing. One of these flew under tower bridge on the day of it's retirement. The pilot was allegedly told "not to do it again" instead of a reprimand because his superiors felt the plane needed a good sending off. [thumb]http://old.hermannkeist.ch/bilder-hawker-hunter/image.raw?view=image&type=orig&id=544[/thumb] [thumb]http://www.pixstel.com/hawker-hunter-air-to-air_pics58-5870.jpg[/thumb] [thumb]http://old.hermannkeist.ch/bilder-hawker-hunter/image.raw?view=image&type=orig&id=1723[/thumb]

[QUOTE=11meister;44664899]Some great ideas there, shame they were never truly realised. Though no small jet will ever be sexier in my eyes than this: The jumo powerplants needed full overhauls after only roughtly 4-7 sorties or a sum total of 24 realistic operational hours - but as they were all made from ferrites instead of the alloys and stainless they'd been designed for, short life span is somewhat to be expected, though the plane could actually be, and was flown with a single engine. I used to wish someone would make a civilian reproduction, there is a group that's built a few modern repro's for musems and aviation societies, so maybe its not a complete pipe dream: [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Me_262_Project[/url][/QUOTE] Didn't some group build a to-spec, full-scale, non-flyable model of the HO/GO 229?

I like the mig-15 better [t]http://www.warhistoryonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Mig15Takeoff05.jpg[/t] [t]http://migluver.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/mig15nellis07.jpg[/t]

[QUOTE=kaine123;44662778]I kind of want to see an M4 with a FAL handguard. [editline]27th April 2014[/editline] [IMG]http://rusknife.com/uploads/monthly_08_2010/post-167-000889600%201282409957.jpg[/IMG] KM 2000 Knife[/QUOTE] Aww yis posted this like 3 times before in this thread, fucken good looking blades those!

XB-70 Valkyrie one of my favorite prototype bombers [img]https://markosun.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/b-70c1.jpg[/img] [img]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/ovni55/XB70ZZ.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.aircraftinformation.info/Images/Valkyrie_10.jpg[/img]

Dat bus: [url]http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/04/foghorn/look-inside-magpuls-retro-1930s-bus/[/url] [img]http://truthaboutguns-zippykid.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/567x378xP1060966-900x600.jpg.pagespeed.ic.3qPrLlDBsh.webp[/img] [img]http://truthaboutguns-zippykid.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/630x420xP1070088-900x600.jpg.pagespeed.ic.8W9NXsHgqp.webp[/img]

i really ought to make the time someday to visit it [t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/8a/North_American_XB-70A_Valkyrie_Ser._No_62-0001.jpg[/t] i mean ive only been living about 15 minutes away from that

Time for some modern-MBTs-which-are-not-Abramses-or-T-72s-or-Leopards! Worst-Korean K1 tank! [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7d/Korean_K1_Tank.JPEG/800px-Korean_K1_Tank.JPEG[/IMG] Known by the American troops on the Korean penisular as the Babby Abrams, due to it's smaller size and outwards appearance. Japanese Type 90 tank! [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bb/Japanese_Type_90_Tank_-_2.jpg/800px-Japanese_Type_90_Tank_-_2.jpg[/IMG] If it looks like a Leo, sounds like a Leo and it shoots like a Leo, it's probably a... Japanese domestic tank that's entirely overpriced because of silly Japanese national pride meaning they wanted to build their own tank instead of importing Leos. And while the Type 90 hasn't ever been deployed to anywhere ever and only been in service for about 20 years, it's going to be replaced by the Type 10. [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/76/Type10MBT.jpg/800px-Type10MBT.jpg[/IMG] Which.. I dunno, looks a little like a... French LeClerc! [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fc/Leclerc-openphotonet_PICT6015.JPG/800px-Leclerc-openphotonet_PICT6015.JPG[/IMG] As the French always say, "Les Baguetté du fromage an tor de Eifel", the LeClerc is the most expensive main battle tank in the world, at a whopping €9.3 million a pop. Sacre Bleu! If that's a bit too pricey for you, but you want that famed southern-european charm, you could always grab yourself a C1 Ariete. [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/83/Italian_MBT.JPG/800px-Italian_MBT.JPG[/IMG] However... I wouldn't do that if I were you. It has an engine that's already moderately underpowered, and they had to detune it to make it not break down all the time. Tsk tsk tsk... Or if you bought a bunch of M60 Pattons back in the 1970's in hopes of looking like America, only to feel left in the dirt when they switched to the M1 tank, do not despair... [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/QeFtMZB.png[/IMG] The M60-2000 120S conversion kit is here! It allows any old M60 to cosplay as an Abrams, sure to impress your neighboring countries with your Western style!

[QUOTE=asteroidrules;44655884]Really if you're gonna play, "let's ID the parts" at least pick something that's not almost as obvious as the stock gear, like these two handguards: [img]http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/536769_545482325465484_219621523_n.jpg[/img] [img]http://cdn2.armslist.com/sites/armslist/uploads/posts/2011/06/08/146674_02_r_a_r_guns_grim_reaper_ar15_640.jpg[/img] Try figuring out what these handguards are.[/QUOTE] Welp, it's been over 24 hours and nobody guessed seriously, so let me reveal it: The top one is [sp]an AB arms hanguard, the non railed version, to my knowledge those are carbine-length-only[/sp] Bottom is [sp]PRI delta, rifle length, with a top rail extension to go over the delta ring[/sp]

[QUOTE=Riller;44669446]Time for some modern-MBTs-which-are-not-Abramses-or-T-72s-or-Leopards! Worst-Korean K1 tank! -tanks- The M60-2000 120S conversion kit is here! It allows any old M60 to cosplay as an Abrams, sure to impress your neighboring countries with your Western style![/QUOTE] you forgot the merchava tank [t]http://cdn2.wn.com/ph/img/23/ca/5bf19cb0619aa9f81daf494c7d12-grande.jpg[/t] [t]http://www.army-technology.com/projects/merkava4/images/merkava4_3.jpg[/t] its even got a doggy door to deploy combat drones... (by that i mean soldiers with anti-tank rockets) heavy enough to defend israel against its noisy neighbors, that or going for a cruze down some stip. its heavy enough for both chores! [t]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-FbQaiYlKiN0/UKG8vQWQWLI/AAAAAAAAUTY/E4z1aa2Mcyo/s1600/n+Israeli+tank+in+a+firing+position+in+the+Israeli-controlled+Golan+Heights+overlooking+the+Syrian+village+of+Bariqa%252C+Monday%252C+Nov.+12%252C+2012.+The+Israeli+military+says+Syrian+mobile+artillery+was+hit+after+respondin.jpg[/t] yep big oppression or defense machines

[QUOTE=Riller;44669446]Worst-Korean K1 tank![/QUOTE] :C... But.. But... We have some good ground units!

New York SAFE Act Compliant Baby-Killer 5500: [IMG]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/IMG_1895.jpg[/IMG] [img]http://truthaboutguns-zippykid.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/630x420xP1060538-900x600.jpg.pagespeed.ic.Nw2Wx7pGc8.webp[/img]

[QUOTE=rebel1324;44671905]:C... But.. But... We have some good ground units![/QUOTE] North Korea still best Korea. Although I will admit your filthy capitalist K2 rifles are pretty nice. [t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Daewoo_K2_rifle_1.jpg[/t] [t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/Daewoo_K2_rifle_2.jpg[/t] Pretty visible AR-15 resemblance, but definitely better than the DPRK's pot-metal and sawdust AK-74s.

IIRC, people are still trying to import the K2's to the states. You'd be lucky to find a pre-import ban one, and for the most you can only fine Daewoos.

[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;44671945]New York SAFE Act Compliant Baby-Killer 5500: [img]http://truthaboutguns-zippykid.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/630x420xP1060538-900x600.jpg.pagespeed.ic.Nw2Wx7pGc8.webp[/img][/QUOTE] I actually quite like this one.