Coolest/Ugliest Weapons V5 - Bullpup AKs are the best
14,930 replies, posted
Other than it not really making sense, it's a cool gun.
[QUOTE=madman770;40671283][IMG]http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120715194405/metro2033/images/e/e5/AK2012_sideview_dirty_M2033.png[/IMG]
Opinions? Personally I like it.
(Kalash 2012 from metro 2033/metro last light)[/QUOTE]
Every metro gun is awesome.
[QUOTE=Disotrtion;40669621]That would be pretty cool. Is the manual in english?[/QUOTE]
Sadly it's in Dutch but there's a lot of quality pictures in there, could translate some things for shits n giggles.
I'll have to do it tomorow, got some shit to take care off today.
the new metro guns are pretty cool
[img]http://www.imfdb.org/images/8/88/Metro2034Valve.JPG[/img]
the valve kicks ass
i think i'm gonna get an FNP chambered in 357 sig. that gun looks fun
[editline]17th May 2013[/editline]
just looking at this gun and everything about it...
it just seems like the perfect first pistol.
[QUOTE=madman770;40671283][IMG]http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120715194405/metro2033/images/e/e5/AK2012_sideview_dirty_M2033.png[/IMG]
Opinions? Personally I like it.
(Kalash 2012 from metro 2033/metro last light)[/QUOTE]
It's neat, but considering it's modelled in a way that makes it impossible for it to eject and it's got a fucking ridiculous length of pull..
[QUOTE=milkandcooki;40674413]the new metro guns are pretty cool
[img]http://www.imfdb.org/images/8/88/Metro2034Valve.JPG[/img]
the valve kicks ass[/QUOTE]
Valve is cool as fuck, put on the compensator and extended magazine and it's easily the best gun in the game
[QUOTE=Neat!;40669906]what y'all think[/QUOTE]
Ugh, putting stickers on a gun is like putting bumper stickers on a car.
[QUOTE=NeoSeeker;40674511]i think i'm gonna get an FNP chambered in 357 sig. that gun looks fun
[editline]17th May 2013[/editline]
just looking at this gun and everything about it...
it just seems like the perfect first pistol.[/QUOTE]
aside from the polymer frame and being manufactured in south America, I've heard good things about it.
[QUOTE=zach1193;40677594]Ugh, putting stickers on a gun is like putting bumper stickers on a car.[/QUOTE]
[I]decoupage[/I]
c'est bon [I]decoupage[/I]
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;40677632]aside from the polymer frame and being manufactured in south America, I've heard good things about it.[/QUOTE]
polymer is good go die
3D printed layered metal oxides are probably going to kill polymer anyway
GE and Boeing are finding it works great for making jet tourbine blades, can't imagine making a gun using sintered metal oxides wouldn't be too much of a creative leap
[editline]17th May 2013[/editline]
note im not talking about the crappy plastic liberator pistol, im talking about making metal guns using 3D printers
[editline]17th May 2013[/editline]
also nasa is using the same technology to print rocket exaust parts, so its not going to melt under temperature
New hickok video
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRP_6JPh98k[/media]
[QUOTE=Jagur;40679945]polymer is good go die[/QUOTE]
Polymer for frames is bad and you should feel bad
hey guys i just found this awesome gun lying around
as if it were a long lost action figure
[editline]17th May 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;40680491]Polymer for frames is bad and you should feel bad[/QUOTE]
aren't glocks polymer framed?
[QUOTE=NeoSeeker;40680504]hey guys i just found this awesome gun lying around
as if it were a long lost action figure
[editline]17th May 2013[/editline]
aren't glocks polymer framed?[/QUOTE]
Yes, yes they are
[img]http://www.gunslot.com/files/gunslot/images/3837.gif[/img]
so to be quite honest i don't see the problem.
does the fnp have an external hammer?
[QUOTE=NeoSeeker;40680749]so to be quite honest i don't see the problem.
does the fnp have an external hammer?[/QUOTE]
Yes, FNP's are hammer fired pistols. If you want a hammer fired pistol you're really better off getting a P226 in .357 SIG. After all Sig Sauer designed the .357 sig round, and P226's have aluminum frames. Even the Navy Seals use P226's.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;40680491]Polymer for frames is bad and you should feel bad[/QUOTE]
yes, polymer frames are garbage.
-lighter
-safer in case of an catastrophic failure, it splits rather than peppering and/or slicing your hands, arms, face and eyes with steel/aluminium shards
-takes more stress, flexes rather than bending/warping
-cheaper
-no rust, no pitting, no constant oiling
yep, they're [B]fucking[/B] awful. why would anyone want polymer frames??
[QUOTE=NeoSeeker;40680749]does the fnp have an external hammer?[/QUOTE]
yes
[editline]17th May 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;40680888]Yes, FNP's are hammer fired pistols. If you want a hammer fired pistol you're really better off getting a P226 in .357 SIG. After all Sig Sauer designed the .357 sig round, and P226's have aluminum frames. [B]Even the Navy Seals use P226's.[/B][/QUOTE]
As if the US military isn't the worst military around when it comes to making good decisions regarding service firearms..
>1911+102
>Speassh Age Pulomers
Lel.
But seriously, there's no beating a metal frame.
[QUOTE=nitedal;40680899]As if the US military isn't the worst military around when it comes to making good decisions regarding service firearms..[/QUOTE]
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/M1_Garand_rifle_-_USA_-_30-06_-_Arm%C3%A9museum.jpg[/t]
[img]http://www.imfdb.org/images/1/1b/H%26KMP5-N.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.imfdb.org/images/c/c1/M14Rifle.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.imfdb.org/images/4/4a/M16A4M203.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.imfdb.org/images/d/d2/Mk18.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=nitedal;40680899]yes, polymer frames are garbage.
-lighter[/quote]
Cause that makes all the difference in a pistol. A P226, with a aluminum frame, weighs a WHOPPING 34 ounces. An FNP weighs a feather weight 24 ounces. What an outstanding advantage.
[QUOTE=nitedal;40680899]
-safer in case of an catastrophic failure, it splits rather than peppering and/or slicing your hands, arms, face and eyes with steel/aluminium shards[/quote]
Not quite sure 9mm really has the explosive power to make your handgun turn into a grenade, especially since the explosions going to completely held within the metal slide, not the frame.
[QUOTE=nitedal;40680899]
-takes more stress, flexes rather than bending/warping[/quote]
OK sure but I'm not sure how often people are going to be driving over their pistols with a semi or accidentally leaving them under a hydrolic press.
[QUOTE=nitedal;40680899]
-cheaper[/quote]
You get what you pay for when it comes to guns. For $500 bucks you get a South American made FNP, for 300 more you get an American/German made P226.
[QUOTE=nitedal;40680899]
-no rust, no pitting, no constant oiling[/quote]
Unless you live next to the ocean, constantly drop your pistol into salt water, or are shooting only corrosive ammo without doing proper cleaning, you don't really have to worry about rusting and pitting. If you oil your pistol at least once a year or so you're really in good shape. But you really should clean and oil your weapons after every shoot so they're properly maintained. Applying oil to the frame as well as the slide isn't a big deal.
[QUOTE=nitedal;40680899]
yep, they're [B]fucking[/B] awful. why would anyone want polymer frames?? [/quote]
"Polymer frames are bad and you should feel bad" was a joke, get over yourself. I prefer actual metal to plastic out of preference.
[QUOTE=nitedal;40680899]
As if the US military isn't the worst military around when it comes to making good decisions regarding service firearms..[/QUOTE]
Are you going to try and tell me P226's are bad and that the Navy Seals are a bad special forces group? I dare you to try and tell me a P226 is bad, [i]I double dog dare you[/i]
M14? Bad decision.
Early M16s? Bad decision.
MP5? Bad decision.
M60? Bad decision.
M249? Bad decision.
Constant use of the same outdated AR platform, 1911s and M9s? Bad decision.
Modern M16's, DMR M14's, and M60's aren't bad. The only reason the originals were bad is because they were rushed when the US was fighting a war it clearly wasn't equipped for. I'm not sure why you're against the MP5 and 249.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;40681189]Cause that makes all the difference in a pistol. A P226, with a aluminum frame, weighs a WHOPPING 34 ounces. An FNP weighs a feather weight 24 ounces. What an outstanding advantage. [/QUOTE]
Hurr. Did I say it makes all the difference? No, I didn't, but some people do actually carry a handgun for hours or days at end.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;40681189]Not quite sure 9mm really has the explosive power to make your handgun turn into a grenade, especially since the explosions going to completely held within the metal slide, not the frame. [/QUOTE]
"What does OOB mean???"
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;40681189]OK sure but I'm not sure how often people are going to be driving over their pistols with a semi or accidentally leaving them under a hydrolic press. [/QUOTE]
Yes, you need a semi or a 16 ton press to bend metal. Yes. Sure.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;40681189]You get what you pay for when it comes to guns. For $500 bucks you get a South American made FNP, for 300 more you get an American/German made P226. [/QUOTE]
An American made Sig is just as bad as an Brazilian made Taurus. If you get a German Sig it's a completely other gun than an American one.
Do you seriously imply that a $500 Glock is shit just because of its price tag?
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;40681189]Unless you live next to the ocean, constantly drop your pistol into salt water, or are shooting only corrosive ammo without doing proper cleaning, you don't really have to worry about rusting and pitting. If you oil your pistol at least once a year or so you're really in good shape. But you really should clean and oil your weapons after every shoot so they're properly maintained. Applying oil to the frame as well as the slide isn't a big deal. [/QUOTE]
What is CC? What is having to carry the gun for longer durations of time without getting to clean it? What is this concept of forgetting?
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;40681189]"Polymer frames are bad and you should feel bad" was a joke, get over yourself. I prefer actual metal to plastic out of preference. [/QUOTE]
No, you get over yourself. You still believe you're always right, don't you?
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;40681189]Are you going to try and tell me P226's are bad and that the Navy Seals are a bad special forces group? I dare you to try and tell me a P226 is bad, [i]I double dog dare you[/i][/QUOTE]
American made P226s are [B]garbage[/B] compared to actual German/Swiss ones. Deal with it, american manufacture is piss bad since you guys have absolutely none competition when your horrible gun manufacturers lobby fucking everything. I mean, why buy a quality Cz or S&L firearm when you can get a Marlin or Ruger??
Navy Seals is possibly one of the most glorified SF groups out there. The fact that Post-Soviet countries still use Makarovs for their SFGs does not mean it's the best handgun in existence.
[QUOTE=nitedal;40681282]Hurr. Did I say it makes all the difference? No, I didn't, but some people do actually carry a handgun for hours or days at end.
[/quote]
What pansy is going to be winded by an extra 10 ounces strapped to his waist?
[QUOTE=nitedal;40681282]
Yes, you need a semi or a 16 ton press to bend metal. Yes. Sure.[/quote]
What every day situation would you put yourself in where you might bend the frame of your pistol?
[QUOTE=nitedal;40681282]
An American made Sig is just as bad as an Brazilian made Taurus. If you get a German Sig it's a completely other gun than an American one.
Do you seriously imply that a $500 Glock is shit just because of its price tag?[/quote]
Most of the parts for Sig pistols are imported from Germany I think, they're just assembled in the US with 922r compliances.
[QUOTE=nitedal;40681282]
What is CC? What is having to carry the gun for longer durations of time without getting to clean it? What is this concept of forgetting?[/quote]
Remember that part where I said if you oil it [b]after[/b] every shoot or [b] once a year[/b]? Yeah me too. Not sure why you'd be CC'ing for a year while walking on a beach, completely unable to oil your pistol. What a weird situation that would be!
[QUOTE=nitedal;40681282]
No, you get over yourself. You still believe you're always right, don't you?[/quote]
~Radical Opinions~. Don't take everything I say seriously or you might end up tooter ticked.
[QUOTE=nitedal;40681282]
American made P226s are [B]garbage[/B] compared to actual German/Swiss ones. Deal with it, american manufacture is piss bad since you guys have absolutely none competition when your horrible gun manufacturers lobby fucking everything. I mean, why buy a quality Cz or S&L firearm when you can get a Marlin or Ruger??
[/quote]
I haven't heard any particular bad things regarding American made P226's, if you could point me to some cases I'd love to educate myself. My ~horribly American Made~ SG556 is the most fantastic rifle I have ever owned. I've put surplus ammo and garbage-grade tulammo through it without any issues. Polymer mags or steel mags, not a single jam on her part. Only issue I've had with the rifle is some of the finish has worn away from where casings were ejected. Only issues I've heard about SG556's is in the 556R's, early models had issues with certain AK mags and wouldn't feed properly.
[QUOTE=nitedal;40681282]
Navy Seals is possibly one of the most glorified SF groups out there. The fact that Post-Soviet countries still use Makarovs for their SFGs does not mean it's the best handgun in existence.[/QUOTE]
Glorified or not you can't really deny that they do good work and know what the fuck they're doing. Now if you're a yurobro who just wants to hate on America, are you going to try and tell me the SAS has no fucking clue what they're doing, using metal framed pistols like the P226 and the stupidly useless Browning Hi Power?
[QUOTE=nitedal;40681282]Merrica sux[/QUOTE]
The fuck you say kid?
Have some freedom motherfucker.
[IMG]http://www.gliddentax.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/American-Flag-Eagle-1024x768.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3368/478/1600/WW2_Iwo_Jima_flag_raising.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa274/hoatran1/viet%20nam/M1Garandrifle.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.employees.org/~beetle/ria4/PCV1-G-F2-H.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.discountfirearmsusa.com/images/library/brs/zoom/1875-1944.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.aviationexplorer.com/Blue%20Angels%20Navy%20F-18%20Aircraft%20Team/Blue%20Angels%20Navy%20F-18%20Jet%20Aircraft%201%20(17).jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img697.imageshack.us/img697/7120/m16a4ar15.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://cdn2.planetminecraft.com/files/resource_media/screenshot/1214/m1a1-980120-A-0000K-002_1925917.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://keyboardmonkey.com/a10.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://brainsyndicate.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/31-images-decade-122409ss.jpg[/IMG]
This page has officially been liberated by the U.S. of fuckin A.
[IMG]http://cs410521.vk.me/v410521929/612d/-qXlPtKHjIc.jpg[/IMG]
Enjoy the rest of your lives, you can thank us later.
[QUOTE=nitedal;40681209]
MP5? Bad decision.
M249? Bad decision[/QUOTE]
Somebody doesn't know what they're talking about
[QUOTE=nitedal;40681209]M14? Bad decision.
Early M16s? Bad decision.
MP5? Bad decision.
M60? Bad decision.
M249? Bad decision.
Constant use of the same outdated AR platform, 1911s and M9s? Bad decision.[/QUOTE]
You posting is a bad decision
stop
TRENCH GUN IS GOOD DECISION
[t]http://upload.hooverae.com/images/DrakeGmbH/mg0809.jpg[/t]
IF GUN IS TOO BIG FOR YOU THEN YOU CAN SEPERATE IT IN HALF FOR EASY STORAGE
[t]http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g287/RufusXG/DSC02099.jpg[/t]
OH HEY THERE SISTER OF TRENCH GUN YOU LOOK SEXY
[img]http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h86/Arkoutha/IMG_1865-1.gif[/img]
NOW DO A SEXY POSE AGAINST THE FENCE, AIM TO PLEASE IS WHAT WE DO HERE
[img]http://i483.photobucket.com/albums/rr195/beeker77/shooting/Shotgun/Win97_full-length_rt-side_w-bayonet_on-fence.jpg[/img]
And pleased I am.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/GAU-8_meets_VW_Type_1.jpg[/t]
good decision
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.