Coolest/Ugliest Weapons V5 - Bullpup AKs are the best

[asteroidrules]

[QUOTE=notrabies;45607366]Ehh, I like the original MPX-K a lot more:
[IMG]http://www.sigsauerguns.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/MPX-K-Detail-L.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]

Pretty much the only difference is the handguard. I also can't seem to find a single image of an MPX with handguards in the style that Sitkero posted.

[Kralizec]

[QUOTE=asteroidrules;45616682]Pretty much the only difference is the handguard. I also can't seem to find a single image of an MPX with handguards in the style that Sitkero posted.[/QUOTE]
One of the first results when typing in 'Sig MPX Keymod rail', in google search;

[t]http://www.defensereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/SIG_SAUER_SIG_MPX_Machine_Pistol_Submachine_Gun_SBR_Carbine_Multi-Caliber_PDW_Personal_Defense_Weapon_NDIA_SOFIC_2014_David_Crane_DefenseReview.com_DR_3.jpg[/t]

[Notrabies]

[QUOTE=asteroidrules;45616682]Pretty much the only difference is the handguard. I also can't seem to find a single image of an MPX with handguards in the style that Sitkero posted.[/QUOTE]

There's also the stock, fire selector, flashhider, upper receiver, sling attachment points, magazine, and magazine release.
Minimal differences on most of those, but they definitely add up.

[asteroidrules]

[QUOTE=notrabies;45616789]There's also the stock, fire selector, flashhider, upper receiver, sling attachment points, magazine, and magazine release.
Minimal differences on most of those, but they definitely add up.[/QUOTE]

I'll concede most of those and blame my not noticing them on me being quite tired. But I don't see what's different about the magazine release, and to a lesser degree the magazines since they've been that dark colored pretty much since we first saw something other than Sig's first image set of the MPX series.

[Notrabies]

[QUOTE=asteroidrules;45616817]I'll concede most of those and blame my not noticing them on me being quite tired. But I don't see what's different about the magazine release, and to a lesser degree the magazines since they've been that dark colored pretty much since we first saw something other than Sig's first image set of the MPX series.[/QUOTE]

Back of the magazine release is a different shape, and possibly flat as opposed to angled. Certainly not much of a difference and easy to miss.
Also, those original magazines appear to possibly be transparent judging by the area around the baseplate, which certainly seems like a good idea that helps me like the prototype gun more than the production model.
That said, so long as they pass up on the hideous keymod rail the production versions still looks pretty great and is one of the only sigs that I think actually looks good.

[Ricaaado]

[QUOTE=Kralizec;45616728]One of the first results when typing in 'Sig MPX Keymod rail', in google search;

[t]http://www.defensereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/SIG_SAUER_SIG_MPX_Machine_Pistol_Submachine_Gun_SBR_Carbine_Multi-Caliber_PDW_Personal_Defense_Weapon_NDIA_SOFIC_2014_David_Crane_DefenseReview.com_DR_3.jpg[/t][/QUOTE]

Why's the fuckin' magwell so disproportionate to the size of the magazine????

[Download]

[QUOTE=TAU!;45617166]Why's the fuckin' magwell so disproportionate to the size of the magazine????[/QUOTE]

It's flanged to make magazine insertion easier.

[kaine123]

[QUOTE=download;45617177]It's flanged to make magazine insertion easier.[/QUOTE]

i didnt know we were talking about your mother

[Riller]

[QUOTE=kaine123;45617200]i didnt know we were talking about your mother[/QUOTE]

[IMG]http://www.greatdreams.com/war/sherman_flamethrower.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/napalm-strike-vietnam.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.tonyrogers.com/weapons/images/high_speed_photos/webready/fuel_air_concussion.jpg[/IMG]

[Ricaaado]

[QUOTE=download;45617177]It's flanged to make magazine insertion easier.[/QUOTE]

It doesn't take a Ph.D to stick a magazine into a magwell. Does it also come with a training arm to hold the pistol grip?

[editline]7th August 2014[/editline]

[QUOTE=kaine123;45617200]i didnt know we were talking about your mother[/QUOTE]

[img]http://www.quirkyscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Explosion-Image-by-US-Department-of-Defense.jpg[/img]

[img]http://i.cbc.ca/1.2511618.1396967154!/httpImage/image.jpeg_gen/derivatives/16x9_620/image.jpeg[/img]

[M.Ciaster]

[QUOTE=notrabies;45607366]Ehh, I like the original MPX-K a lot more:
[IMG]http://www.sigsauerguns.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/MPX-K-Detail-L.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]

wow, it looks like an 80s sci-fi movie prop based on a MP5K

kinda like what they did with the mini uzis in total recall

[img]http://puu.sh/aIgO1/5338682a25.jpg[/img]

[Download]

[QUOTE=TAU!;45617491]It doesn't take a Ph.D to stick a magazine into a magwell. Does it also come with a training arm to hold the pistol grip?
[/QUOTE]

Try inserting a magazine when your hands are shaking with adrenaline.

[Araknid]

[img]http://www.firearmsworld.net/fn/fal/24.jpg[/img]
[quote]A product of Australian participation in the conflict in Viet Namwas the field modification of L1A1 and L2A1 rifles by the Australian Special Air Service Regiment SASR for better handling. Nicknamed "The Bitch".

These rifles were field modified, often from heavy barrelled L2A1 automatic rifles, with their barrels chopped off immediately in front of the gas block, and often with the L2A1 bipods removed and a XM148 40 mm grenade launcher mounted below the barrel. The XM148 40 mm grenade launchers were obtained from U.S. forces. For the L1A1, the lack of fully-automatic fire resulted in the unofficial conversion of the L1A1 to full-auto capability by simple filing of the selector, or by inserting a 'foreign body' to block the sear.

They would typically be equipped with 30-round magazines, either the straight version specifically made for the L2A1, or the slightly curved on used on the L4 Bren conversion. (As this mag was designed to feed downwards it often had an extra spring inserted to help feed upwards properly).

The barrels were chopped to make handling in the bush easier, and to increase the sound and flash signature when the weapon was fired. When a contact was initiated, the typical SASR 5-man patrol would lay down massive amounts of fire, the sound and flash of the chopped barrels adding to the 'shock and awe' effect, disorienting the VC or NVA and giving them the impression that they were in contact with a much larger force. I'm sure I read somewhere that occassionaly the cone-shaped flash eliminator from an M3 'Gease Gun' was welded to the barrel, which made is sound like a .5 M2 when it was fired
[/quote]

[D_M_]

[QUOTE=M.Ciaster;45617841]wow, it looks like an 80s sci-fi movie prop based on a MP5K

kinda like what they did with the mini uzis in total recall

[img]http://puu.sh/aIgO1/5338682a25.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]

Don't you mean Mac-10's?

[Ilwrath]

[QUOTE=Da_Maniac_;45618194]Don't you mean Mac-10's?[/QUOTE]

Those are quite obviously micro uzis.

[Xombi]

It looks like a nailgun with that handguard

[MAC21500]

[QUOTE=ZestyLemons;45607500]

This one is pretty badass:

[t]http://www.projectafterforums.com/uploads/monthly_09_2013/post-434-1379778204.jpg[/t][/QUOTE]

So easy a teenager did it:

.410 revolver carbine
[url]http://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/2014/08/07/royal-nonesuch-awesome-homemade-weapon-insanity/[/url]
[img]http://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Royal-Nonesuch-YouTube.jpg[/img]

[Nerts]

Is he wearing earbuds as ear defenders?

[Pvt. Martin]

[QUOTE=Rents;45620536]Is he wearing earbuds as ear defenders?[/QUOTE]

Gotta protect my ears with the help of Michael Jackson albums.

[Sableye]

[QUOTE=1chains1;45607775]Fuck that shit, that thing has "misfire" written all over it.[/QUOTE]

ever tried to use a staplegun before? solid concrete in a trigger would be lighter to pull than that

[DIOBRANDO]

Thats what you say until you have it holstered and you sit down and lose half an arse cheek from it.

[Common_Crab]

[t]http://celticowboy.com/V-173.jpg[/t]
[t]http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/attachments/aviation/197357d1332887219t-vought-xf5u-flying-pancake-dallas-museum-xf5u1.jpg[/t]
I don't think it's possible for an aircraft to be uglier than this.

[Trainbike]

[QUOTE=Texas_Ranger;45622528]
[t]http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/attachments/aviation/197357d1332887219t-vought-xf5u-flying-pancake-dallas-museum-xf5u1.jpg[/t]
I don't think it's possible for an aircraft to be uglier than this.[/QUOTE]

So [I]this[/I] is what it looks like when a plane has downs syndrome.

[Griffalo]

[QUOTE=Trainbike;45622870]So [I]this[/I] is what it looks like when a plane has downs syndrome.[/QUOTE]
Nope, this is...
[IMG]http://www.airnewstimes.co.uk/resim/fotogaleri/82/69252.jpg[/IMG]

[kaine123]

[IMG]http://th06.deviantart.net/fs70/PRE/f/2010/151/2/b/KAC_PDW_by_Drake_UK.jpg[/IMG]

Knight's Armament PDW

[MAC21500]

[QUOTE=kaine123;45622926][IMG]http://th06.deviantart.net/fs70/PRE/f/2010/151/2/b/KAC_PDW_by_Drake_UK.jpg[/IMG]

Knight's Armament PDW[/QUOTE]

In 6x35 KAC
Now if they'd just chamber it in 7.62x35 (.300 BLK) and sell it to civilians, we'd be all set.

[editline]7th August 2014[/editline]

Squib loads:
[url]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/08/07/cutaway-bore-obstructions-kabooms/[/url]
[img]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/IMG_3542.jpg[/img]

[marden]

Can someone identify this gun?

[IMG]http://netstorage.discovery.com/feeds/brightcove/asset-stills/mil/137398940286714118200301197_tier_1_training.jpg[/IMG]

[MAC21500]

[QUOTE=Marden;45623751]Can someone identify this gun?

[IMG]http://netstorage.discovery.com/feeds/brightcove/asset-stills/mil/137398940286714118200301197_tier_1_training.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]

It's a custom (possibly factory custom) AR-15 build.

[asteroidrules]

The PDW really looks a lot like their concept for a SCAR alternative
[video=youtube;Gnevku6vJrQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gnevku6vJrQ[/video]
Actual looks at it starts around 2:30. I like their use of what appears to be an AR-15 compatible stock tube.

[TehAgentGuy]

[img]http://i.imgur.com/V9jmfS3.jpg[/img]
What an unwieldy looking shotgun.