Coolest/Ugliest Weapons V5 - Bullpup AKs are the best
14,930 replies, posted
[QUOTE=PrusseLusken;45779588][IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b4/Sukhoi_Su-47_Berkut_%28S-37%29_in_2001.jpg[/IMG]
ww2 planes go catch fire and crash when your wooden fuselage snaps
berkut 4ever[/QUOTE]
It can outmaneuver the F22, but outrun it? lmao nop
[QUOTE=PrusseLusken;45779623]sssh, just think about the improved agility[/QUOTE]
think about the increased structural fatigue
[QUOTE=Sableye;45779568][t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fb/F82_twin_mustang.jpg[/t]
or just join up and form mustangtron?[/QUOTE]
As ridiculous as it looks, that thing did set some records. If I recall correctly it has a ridiculous range.
[QUOTE=joost1120;45779761]As ridiculous as it looks, that thing did set some records. If I recall correctly it has a ridiculous range.[/QUOTE]
It also had a gunpod with 8 M3 .50 cals.
Making it 12 .50 cals in total.
[B]DAKKADAKKADAKKA[/B]
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ee/Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-487-3066-04%2C_Flugzeug_Messerschmitt_Me_109.jpg[/img]
G6 with more dakka under the wings.
I prefer the K4's cockpit windows though.. just looks sexy as hell.
[img]http://www.asisbiz.com/il2/Bf-109K/Bf-109K-JG3.11-(Y1+I)-Deskau/images/1-Bf-109K4-11.JG3-(Y1+I)-Martin-Deskau-WNr334176-Pasewalk-1945-01.jpg[/img]
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/Flak18-36.jpg/800px-Flak18-36.jpg[/img]
[img]http://puu.sh/b56bW/887f274e03.jpg[/img]
fuck yo planes :v:
AA guns are neat
Can Sweden join your little party?
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/rtRgbU2.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=M.Ciaster;45780804][img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/Flak18-36.jpg/800px-Flak18-36.jpg[/img]
[img]http://puu.sh/b56bW/887f274e03.jpg[/img]
fuck yo planes :v:
AA guns are neat[/QUOTE]
[img]https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7021/6686003633_b2b4bb5513_z.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.dansdata.com/images/blog/big_guns/gustav.jpg[/img]
[t]http://spi2uk.itvnet.lv/upload2/articles/70/704574/images/_origin_WW1-un-WW2-Lielakas-8.jpg[/t]
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/14/80cm_Gustav_shell.jpg/640px-80cm_Gustav_shell.jpg[/t]
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1d/DoraVSScarab.svg/555px-DoraVSScarab.svg.png[/img]
fuck yo village :v:
I wonder what a shotgun tank would be like? Firing shells that make punt gun shells look 12 gauge.
[QUOTE=Zakkin;45780927]
fuck yo village :v:
I wonder what a shotgun tank would be like? Firing shells that make punt gun shells look 12 gauge.[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/8OhN2gB.jpg[/IMG]
90mm? That's a bit too small.
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/30/Yamato_during_Trial_Service.jpg[/IMG]
Battleship Yamato. It has nine 46cm cannons. It had special anti-air shells, which were filled with around 900 incendiary tubes and 600 steel stays.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3e/San-shiki_dan_explosion.jpg[/t]
Sadly they weren't very effective against aircraft, because the blast of the main cannons would disrupt the other anti aircraft cannons.
[QUOTE=Zakkin;45780927]
fuck yo village :v:
I wonder what a shotgun tank would be like? Firing shells that make punt gun shells look 12 gauge.[/QUOTE]
I'm pretty sure there's special canister shells for the 120mm on the Abrams that are essentially massively upscaled buckshot
[QUOTE=joost1120;45781003]90mm? That's a bit too small.
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/30/Yamato_during_Trial_Service.jpg[/IMG]
Battleship Yamato. It has nine 46cm cannons. It had special anti-air shells, which were filled with around 900 incendiary tubes and 600 steel stays.
[/QUOTE]
46cm? That's a bit too small.
Gustav took 80cm.
[t]http://f3.fsm.wikidi.com/aq/aa/k1/fb79fb0805fb6e34d34c79d01cde672cb3fbacd0.jpg[/t][t]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-9slFOalXQw8/TqNE-U1CeyI/AAAAAAAAI0Y/x2XAixPXBYo/s1600/Gustav%2Bgun.JPG[/t]
[QUOTE=Trekintosh;45779261]
[img]http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acimages/p38_bystronski.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Y'know, until I played War Thunder, I always thought that the exhaust above the engines were the P-38's guns.
[QUOTE=Zakkin;45781036]46cm? That's a bit too small.
Gustav took 80cm.
[t]http://f3.fsm.wikidi.com/aq/aa/k1/fb79fb0805fb6e34d34c79d01cde672cb3fbacd0.jpg[/t][t]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-9slFOalXQw8/TqNE-U1CeyI/AAAAAAAAI0Y/x2XAixPXBYo/s1600/Gustav%2Bgun.JPG[/t][/QUOTE]
Gustav didn't have 9 of them. Also, it didn't have awesome AA fireworks.
It's final armament had like nine 46cm guns, six 155mm guns, twenty-four 127mm guns and one hundred and sixty-two 25mm guns.
Also it's a fucking boat. A boat that weighs 70000 tons. The third Yamato class battleship got converted into a carrier during construction. It was the biggest carrier until the construction of the USS Forrestal in 1954. Even by today's standards, it's a super carrier. It could hold 162 planes in it's cargo hold.
[QUOTE=T553412;45781041]Y'know, until I played War Thunder, I always thought that the exhaust above the engines were the P-38's guns.[/QUOTE]
It's also the turbo-supercharger systems. P-38 was one of the highest flying longest range fighters of WWII.
[editline]23rd August 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=joost1120;45781175]Also it's a fucking boat. A boat that weighs 70000 tons. The third Yamato class battleship got converted into a carrier during construction. It was the biggest carrier until the construction of the USS Forrestal in 1954. Even by today's standards, it's a super carrier. It could hold 162 planes in it's cargo hold.[/QUOTE]
It also got sunk by a single torpedo hit from one submarine that stumbled across it by accident because it was both incompetently designed and captained.
The Iowa class' 16 inch guns were a match for the Yamato's in destructive power, and outranged it significantly.
[QUOTE=joost1120;45781003]90mm? That's a bit too small.
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/30/Yamato_during_Trial_Service.jpg[/IMG]
Battleship Yamato. It has nine 46cm cannons. It had special anti-air shells, which were filled with around 900 incendiary tubes and 600 steel stays.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3e/San-shiki_dan_explosion.jpg[/t]
Sadly they weren't very effective against aircraft, because the blast of the main cannons would disrupt the other anti aircraft cannons.[/QUOTE]
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b6/Dauntless_bomb_drop.jpg[/img]
[i]Catch[/i]
[QUOTE=Zakkin;45781036]46cm? That's a bit too small.
Gustav took 80cm.
[t]http://f3.fsm.wikidi.com/aq/aa/k1/fb79fb0805fb6e34d34c79d01cde672cb3fbacd0.jpg[/t][t]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-9slFOalXQw8/TqNE-U1CeyI/AAAAAAAAI0Y/x2XAixPXBYo/s1600/Gustav%2Bgun.JPG[/t][/QUOTE]
Ah yes, massive, sorta useless, Warhammer-esque giganto gun. Only 2 were ever built, and they required way too much time and resources to be built and maintained.
[QUOTE=Sitkero;45781018]I'm pretty sure there's special canister shells for the 120mm on the Abrams that are essentially massively upscaled buckshot[/QUOTE]
[video=youtube;Cgn1nhUEgo8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cgn1nhUEgo8[/video]
Notice the air distortion around it :v:
Does anyone here remember the name of that weird little AK submachine gun that had pretty much a completely normal AK receiver but with the pistol grip moved up so the magazines were inserted into it?
Gepard SMG.
[IMG]https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1.0-9/1187301_743530552345893_501042969_n.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://koh-nisi.zuya.jp/gun/kikaku/gepard/gepard_short.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://koh-nisi.zuya.jp/gun/kikaku/gepard/gepard_long.jpg[/IMG]
[editline]24th August 2014[/editline]
It carries the proud tradition of weird AK-based prototypes of just keeping the regular wooden handguard, also seen on the OT-14 Groza.
[IMG]http://img1.liveinternet.ru/images/attach/c/0//48/108/48108651_1251539416_OC14_Groza.jpg[/IMG]
Couldn't even have gone with a plastic 74M handguard? Just, you know, to fit in? Nope, wood!
Danke.
Here, have something I ran into while I was looking:
[img]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/1-tfb.jpeg[/img]
A custom job made using an SL8 stock and the bolt+barrel of a Sten.
Also didn't the Groza keep the wood hand guards because they were being built out of old Krinks and wanted to reuse parts?
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;45785063]Danke.
Here, have something I ran into while I was looking:
[img]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/1-tfb.jpeg[/img]
A custom job made using an SL8 stock and the bolt+barrel of a Sten.[/QUOTE]
Looks very... Killzone-ish.
[QUOTE=Trekintosh;45781904]It's also the turbo-supercharger systems. P-38 was one of the highest flying longest range fighters of WWII.
[editline]23rd August 2014[/editline]
It also got sunk by a single torpedo hit from one submarine that stumbled across it by accident because it was both incompetently designed and captained.
The Iowa class' 16 inch guns were a match for the Yamato's in destructive power, and outranged it significantly.[/QUOTE]
Both the Yamato and the Musashi were sent on a suicide mission. Yamato was hit by at least 11 torpedoes and 6 bombs, while Musashi was hit by 19 torpedoes and 17 bombs.
Shinano's crew completely ignored the torpedo hits until there was nothing they could do. And there were 4 torpedoes.
Also, the Iowa's 16 inch guns had a range of 38km, while Yamato's 46cm guns had a range of 42km.
People posting sexy planes without posting the sexiest of all
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Serbian_mig-29_missiles.jpg[/t]
[t]http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/6/56363.jpg[/t]
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ea/MiG-29_Fulcrum.jpg[/t]
[t]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-fdbTjni-06s/TwXpZUKXs8I/AAAAAAAAAmg/l5pnLWDcAoY/s1600/MiG-29%2BFulcrum%2BFighter%2BBomber%2BAircraft2.jpg[/t]
MIG-29 Fulcrum > all
[QUOTE=Araknid;45785121]
MIG-29 Fulcrum > all[/QUOTE]
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e8/MiG-29_wreck.jpg[/t]
rip
[editline]24th August 2014[/editline]
and no one died it was blown up at an airbase during the invasion before anyone could take off in it.
My favourite part of the MiG-29 (and many other Russian jets of it's generation) is that it has two very distinct shapes; one above-wing and one below-wing. The cockpit and tail and such has absolutely no say in any of the angles or curves below wing-level, and the engines have no say in how the above-area is shaped. Compare to an F18 that has more of a distinct part you'd recognize as a fuselage, where engine and cockpit and such are a part sticking out of.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/F-15E_Strike_Eagle_banks_away_from_a_tanker.jpg[/t]
Glorious F-15.
[t]http://www.aircraftrecognition.co.uk/images/Aircraft/Fast%20Jet/F-14/f-14-tomcat.jpg[/t]
Even more glorious F-14.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/SlLShRkl.jpg[/IMG]
sexy jas gripen
