Coolest/Ugliest Weapons V5 - Bullpup AKs are the best - General

Thumb Safety Gluke [url]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/08/25/thumb-safety-glock/[/url] [img]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/glock-1024x679-660x437.jpg[/img]

Sweet. I hear one of the police forces here in Australia asked for their Glocks to have a thumb safety; never heard anything conclusive though.

[QUOTE=MAC21500;45794979]Thumb Safety Gluke [url]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/08/25/thumb-safety-glock/[/url] [img]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/glock-1024x679-660x437.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] Oh neat, a Glock without the feature that makes a Glock a Glock! [sp]The pin and fuze[/sp]

[QUOTE=Gen. Crumpets;45793733]Looks to me like the jet's going supersonic, which is causing the water droplets on and around the plane to condense as the shockwave brushes over it.[/QUOTE] Makes sense.

[QUOTE=PrusseLusken;45795697]ha ha ha[/QUOTE] No but seriously, the no manual safety part of the Glock is one of the most noteworthy things about it, so it is sort of a glockless glock.

[t]http://turntherightcorner.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/sin-city-2-a-dame-to-kill-for-screenshot-nancy-crossbow.jpg[/t] pump-action crossbow because she totally has the muscles to use it like a shotgun

[img]http://i.imgur.com/YypTiMq.jpg[/img] [t]http://i.imgur.com/deBO6iK.jpg[/t] [t]http://i.imgur.com/NpLzirf.jpg[/t]

[QUOTE=download;45793376]I think that was its predecessor the U-2[/QUOTE] U-2 follows a different development path than the sr-71, the U-2's obsession was flying higher than the russian flying telephone-poles can hit and loiter there, but the sr-71's path was speed which lead it to having to fly so high

[QUOTE=Zakkin;45796135][t]http://i.imgur.com/NpLzirf.jpg[/t][/QUOTE] beautiful [editline]25th August 2014[/editline] even if its usefulness is only limited to executions by beheading, IDK

[QUOTE=M.Ciaster;45793371][url]http://www.econrates.com/reality/schul.html[/url] Just googled for 'cessna sr71 speed check' :v:[/QUOTE] Went looking and found a few more stories from the same guy (first post is the same story) [url]http://supercubclub.proboards.com/thread/3388[/url]

[QUOTE=MAC21500;45794979]Thumb Safety Gluke [url]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/08/25/thumb-safety-glock/[/url] [img]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/glock-1024x679-660x437.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] I'm going to get "ewww"d at by Riller for this, but I'd love a Glock with a grip safety.

[QUOTE=MeltingData;45796457]I'm going to get "ewww"d at by Riller for this, but I'd love a Glock with a grip safety.[/QUOTE] Then buy a Springfield XD!

[QUOTE=MAC21500;45797877]Then buy a Springfield XD![/QUOTE] fucking I thought you used XD as an emote

[QUOTE=Crash155;45798190]fucking I thought you used XD as an emote[/QUOTE] I think thats what he was trying to make you think.

[QUOTE=Trekintosh;45793229]SR-71 is, in my opinion, the single most badass aircraft ever to grace the skies of our planet, and the greatest indicator of humanity's obsession to do one better. Further, faster, higher, stronger, the SR-71 is the embodiment of this drive to improvement.[/QUOTE] [img]https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/a-12/images-and-thumbnails/ch8_1.jpg/image.jpg[/img] Nobody remembers the SR-71's faster, higher-flying sibling.

[QUOTE=Crash155;45798190]fucking I thought you used XD as an emote[/QUOTE] this literally always happens

[QUOTE=catbarf;45799253][img]https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/a-12/images-and-thumbnails/ch8_1.jpg/image.jpg[/img] Nobody remembers the SR-71's faster, higher-flying sibling.[/QUOTE] but wasn't that the sr-71's developmental and CIA designation

[QUOTE=Sableye;45800275]but wasn't that the sr-71's developmental and CIA designation[/QUOTE] A-12 is a single seater, SR-71 has two seats. A-12 was ran by the CIA, SR-71 was USAF

Desert Tech MDR [t]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/assault/usa/1397508887.jpg[/t] [t]http://cdn.gunsamerica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/desert-tech03.jpg[/t] Bulpup battlerifle. Fires everything everything nato, 7.62 NATO, .300 AAC, 6.8 spc, 5.56, and even 7.62 Russian. I want one. [t]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/assault/usa/1397508920.jpg[/t] Also comes in carbine versions.

[QUOTE=Bat-shit;45796222]beautiful [editline]25th August 2014[/editline] even if its usefulness is only limited to executions by beheading, IDK[/QUOTE] When it comes down to beheading, I'd prefer this: [IMG]http://www.antitank.co.uk/images/ptrd-front2.jpg[/IMG]

[QUOTE=joost1120;45802017]When it comes down to beheading, I'd prefer this: [IMG]http://www.antitank.co.uk/images/ptrd-front2.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] Oh man, I totally remember using that thing as an unscoped sniper rifle back in RO1 days, just taking heads off people with it's atrociously shitty sights.

If this were /k/ or any other forum i'm sure by now somebody would've posted the gif somewhat related to the discussion of the ISIS guy beheading a dude with a pickup mounted DSHK or M2, i can't remember which. Which would suck less to have your head removed by, a large bullet or a sword?

I assume a bullet would be somewhat more instant. [editline]26th August 2014[/editline] With a sword or any other bladed instrument it might n to go all the way through on the first chop. Eurgh I don't want to think about that.

[QUOTE=catbarf;45799253][img]https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/a-12/images-and-thumbnails/ch8_1.jpg/image.jpg[/img] Nobody remembers the SR-71's faster, higher-flying sibling.[/QUOTE] If it was faster than the SR-71 then why does the SR-71 hold the airbreathing speed record? [editline]26th August 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=FloaterTWO;45802225]If this were /k/ or any other forum i'm sure by now somebody would've posted the gif somewhat related to the discussion of the ISIS guy beheading a dude with a pickup mounted DSHK or M2, i can't remember which. Which would suck less to have your head removed by, a large bullet or a sword?[/QUOTE] I'd take the bullet. You might be concious for a few seconds after your head is removed.

[QUOTE=FloaterTWO;45802225]If this were /k/ or any other forum i'm sure by now somebody would've posted the gif somewhat related to the discussion of the ISIS guy beheading a dude with a pickup mounted DSHK or M2, i can't remember which. Which would suck less to have your head removed by, a large bullet or a sword?[/QUOTE] Well heaving your head removed by a large bullet usually means it is turned into hamburger, in which case you would feel nothing because your brain would be torn apart. For a sword you might actually feel some pain because there is a chance you may remain conscious after a clean beheading with a sword. In experiments rats were shown to exhibit brain activity associated with thought and sensation for several seconds after decapitation.

[IMG]http://troydefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/SportingRifleIntro_notext1.jpg[/IMG] Troy Sporting Rifle

I like it. What does it fire, 556? 'cause it sorta kinda looks a lot like a 762 AR platform, in the angles of the receiver. Don't really get why they decided to make it like that, when an AR15 receiver would have let them do literally the exact same rifle, and give it more compatibility with other stuff.

idk lol i just think it looks cool

[QUOTE=Riller;45802384]I like it. What does it fire, 556? 'cause it sorta kinda looks a lot like a 762 AR platform, in the angles of the receiver. Don't really get why they decided to make it like that, when an AR15 receiver would have let them do literally the exact same rifle, and give it more compatibility with other stuff.[/QUOTE] It's a pump action for places like New York.

[QUOTE=MegaChalupa;45802471]It's a pump action for places like New York.[/QUOTE] Or Australia. If it doesn't use an AR15 lower it might be importable.