• Coolest/Ugliest Weapons V5 - Bullpup AKs are the best
    14,930 replies, posted
[QUOTE=kaine123;46245537][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/JJ1k8dG.jpg[/IMG] cali legal mka 1919 :suicide:[/QUOTE] I've said this quite a few times on FP before, but I live in CA and have never seen one of those stocks. I don't know what it is with those things, but from what I know a normal stock on an AR is perfectly legal, and you don't have to get one of those abominations. Hell, I even have an AR-15 and the only thing separating it from any other AR is a different mag release.
[QUOTE=kaine123;46245537][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/JJ1k8dG.jpg[/IMG] cali legal mka 1919 :suicide:[/QUOTE] This actually looks cool, but only if they cut out the inside of it like the SL8/9.
[QUOTE=Trooper0315;46245913]I've said this quite a few times on FP before, but I live in CA and have never seen one of those stocks. I don't know what it is with those things, but from what I know a normal stock on an AR is perfectly legal, and you don't have to get one of those abominations. Hell, I even have an AR-15 and the only thing separating it from any other AR is a different mag release.[/QUOTE] I think Cali's law has a "restricted features" list, so if a weapon has a set number of components on that list then it's banned, so it'd come down to either those horrible stocks or those gimped magazine releases. But if we do wanna talk about California's more absurd laws, how about the fact that on your Assault Weapons Ban the word Steyr is misspelled and the Beretta BM-59 is credited as being made by Springfield Armory? Or that this [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bb/Yugo_SKS.jpg[/img] is a [b]destructive device[/b]? [sp]it's because the glorious SKS of the glorious Socijalistička Federativna Republika Jugoslavija has an integral 22mm rifle grenade launcher on the end of the barrel, in California that's considered the weapon.[/sp] Also that may be the sexiest picture of an SKS that has ever been taken.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ygrmC9c.gif[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Binladen34;46246046]This actually looks cool, but only if they cut out the inside of it like the SL8/9.[/QUOTE] [img]http://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g96/talonxracer/IMG_1485_zpse96de4df.jpg[/img] There are a few half decent looking thumbholes out there for AR rifles. Not much point to them though.
[QUOTE=kaine123;46246212][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ygrmC9c.gif[/IMG][/QUOTE] I've always wondered how that would work, since the cylinders don't even line up with the barrel. Also, wouldn't firing it hurt your crotch?
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/3jZ7LrD.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Trooper0315;46245913]I've said this quite a few times on FP before, but I live in CA and have never seen one of those stocks. I don't know what it is with those things, but from what I know a normal stock on an AR is perfectly legal, and you don't have to get one of those abominations. Hell, I even have an AR-15 and the only thing separating it from any other AR is a different mag release.[/QUOTE] yeah but if you ever want to take that mag release and switch it to a normal one, you have to disfigure your AR to make it look like that
[QUOTE=Juniez;46247165]yeah but if you ever want to take that mag release and switch it to a normal one, you have to disfigure your AR to make it look like that[/QUOTE] You can get by the bullet button law by just putting a small magnetic attachment that attaches over the bullet button and then works like a normal mag release. There's really no reason to.
[QUOTE=kaine123;46245537][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/JJ1k8dG.jpg[/IMG] cali legal mka 1919 :suicide:[/QUOTE] how the fuck do you even hold that is the right side hollow?
[QUOTE=kaine123;46246874][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/3jZ7LrD.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] That revolver looks actually quite good. 5 round of .380 in something that size is nothing to sneeze at.
[QUOTE=Crash155;46247809]how the fuck do you even hold that is the right side hollow?[/QUOte] Talking about stocks... The bullpup Springfield M1903. :suicide: [IMG]http://m2.i.pbase.com/o6/25/8425/1/143095472.PzrrxddN.bullpup1903.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Doc_Fisherman;46247912]Talking about stocks... The bullpup Springfield M1903. :suicide: [IMG]http://m2.i.pbase.com/o6/25/8425/1/143095472.PzrrxddN.bullpup1903.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] ...why
[QUOTE=Toy_Soldier;46248409]...why[/QUOTE] Because between the M1903 and the M1 Garand, the USMC was looking to improve their service rifle. This was a very legit attempt at doing just that. The idea behind it is very sound, too bad the execution is... Well, about as clumsy as you'd expect the [I]worlds first bullpup rifle[/I] to be.
[QUOTE=Doc_Fisherman;46247912]Talking about stocks... The bullpup Springfield M1903. :suicide: [IMG]http://m2.i.pbase.com/o6/25/8425/1/143095472.PzrrxddN.bullpup1903.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] Is it even possible to chamber a new round without taking it off your shoulder? It looks like the bolt in the furthest back position would be behind the stock..
[QUOTE=Riller;46249116]Because between the M1903 and the M1 Garand, the USMC was looking to improve their service rifle. This was a very legit attempt at doing just that. The idea behind it is very sound, too bad the execution is... Well, about as clumsy as you'd expect the [I]worlds first bullpup rifle[/I] to be.[/QUOTE] I don't think it's the first. [img]http://www.militaryimages.net/photopost/data/1/Thornycroft.JPG[/img] [img]http://www.militaryimages.net/photopost/data/1/Thornycroft1.JPG[/img] According to wikipedia these Thorneycroft carbines were developed by an English gunsmith in 1901. That bullpup Springfield would, obviously, have to be from no earlier than 1903.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;46249271]I don't think it's the first. [img]http://www.militaryimages.net/photopost/data/1/Thornycroft.JPG[/img] [img]http://www.militaryimages.net/photopost/data/1/Thornycroft1.JPG[/img] According to wikipedia these Thorneycroft carbines were developed by an English gunsmith in 1901. That bullpup Springfield would, obviously, have to be from no earlier than 1903.[/QUOTE] ...Huh. Well butter my butt, I was wrong. Sill a pioneering attempt, though.
Far as I can tell the Springfield was the first one that anybody took seriously. Thorneycroft tried getting the British Cavalry to use his carbines, but they were almost done putting together the SMLE at the time, and when they gave it a try they found nothing but problems with it. Also, I like the FN-49 [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/da/FN49left.jpg[/img] It's like the FAL's older half-sister.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;46249380]Also, I like the FN-49 [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/da/FN49left.jpg[/img] It's like the FAL's older half-sister.[/QUOTE] [I]~I was born too late into a world that doesn't care Oh I wish I was a punk-rock girl With flowers in my haiir~[/I]
[QUOTE=kaine123;46246874][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/3jZ7LrD.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] hey it's the cop version of [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFr30p0aZl0[/media]
Suppressors are neat and x-rays of suppressors are really neat [img]https://40.media.tumblr.com/46ddf56f6126ba72be2f403772a38820/tumblr_n06qebv5oi1torpfzo1_500.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Riller;46237706] That's how it'd look when ready to fire... Quite possibly a contender for least useful weapon in history, given it's holy trinity of no ergonomics, no firepower, and capacity to empty it's magazine in literally one second.[/QUOTE] Usable by assassins, maybe? The bolt operates inside of a tube, so you could hold your hand over the top, and the barrel is threaded to mount a suppressor.
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;46257588]Usable by assassins, maybe? The bolt operates inside of a tube, so you could hold your hand over the top, and the barrel is threaded to mount a suppressor.[/QUOTE] eh assassins already have silenced .22s and stuff, and if you're just gonna be unsubtle and full auto someone you might as well just do that with a real gun :v:
[QUOTE=Sitkero;46257565]Suppressors are neat and x-rays of suppressors are really neat [img]https://40.media.tumblr.com/46ddf56f6126ba72be2f403772a38820/tumblr_n06qebv5oi1torpfzo1_500.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] That's really baffling to look at
[QUOTE=Sitkero;46257565]Suppressors are neat and x-rays of suppressors are really neat <silencers>[/QUOTE] Looks like fleshtubes
[video=youtube;Q_XNWeMqCT0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_XNWeMqCT0&list=UUefQw7bLRPKSG-qx9dJroew[/video] This is why you don't load smokeless into a gun built for black powder kids.
[QUOTE=kaine123;46259572][video=youtube;Q_XNWeMqCT0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_XNWeMqCT0&list=UUefQw7bLRPKSG-qx9dJroew[/video] This is why you don't load smokeless into a gun built for black powder kids.[/QUOTE] [I]je was.....*takes off glasses dramatically* un-harmed but it could have been worse, if...he had loaded all the chambres[/i] such an accent
I'm not usually one for requests, but I'm working on another gun model and I could use some suggestions for good modern style "tactical" stocks, preferably folding and not AR-15, any ideas?
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;46266889]I'm not usually one for requests, but I'm working on another gun model and I could use some suggestions for good modern style "tactical" stocks, preferably folding and not AR-15, any ideas?[/QUOTE] [img]http://www.cyberphoto.se/hobby/bilder/ak5c_stock.jpg[/img] I enjoy this one, maybe out of bias because swed (AK5C stock)
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;46266889]I'm not usually one for requests, but I'm working on another gun model and I could use some suggestions for good modern style "tactical" stocks, preferably folding and not AR-15, any ideas?[/QUOTE] XCR with the ACR folding buttstock: [img]http://images20.fotki.com/v233/photos/1/932051/9642762/IMG_1016-vi.jpg[/img] [img]http://images59.fotki.com/v1579/photos/1/932051/9642762/IMG_1015-vi.jpg[/img] Zenit Co skeletonized aluminum adjustable sidefolder: [thumb]http://zenphotos.net/zenphotos/file/Online/SVD/Mounts/ZenitCo_AK105_RMR_Right01.jpg[/thumb] [editline]18th October 2014[/editline] H&K G36C and H&K 243 super ugly adjustable sidefolders: [img]http://truthaboutguns-zippykid.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/P1090177-900x600.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.heckler-koch.com/uploads/tx_z7productshk/HK243_TAR_re_BLK_BasisConfig.png[/img]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.