Coolest/Ugliest Weapons V5 - Bullpup AKs are the best
14,930 replies, posted
can you two buffoonfaced buttwenches give me valid arguments instead of dropping ratings and running
[QUOTE=Joazzz;40709209]can you buffoonfaced buttwenches give me valid arguments instead of dropping ratings and running[/QUOTE]
The legs are more vulnerable to attacks than treads are, I'm guessing. Also, if you take out one leg, it pretty much falls over and could be more damaged than a tank going without one set of treads.
ah yes i forgot about this thread's collective general hatred for anything that has legs instead of treads or wheels. yall should keep in mind that all mechs are fueled by the Rule of Cool, not the other thing called Common Sense. bitching about them having legs is waste of time, effort and energy
still, the Chromehounds are manifestations of gritty military realism if we compare them to Armored Core and other eastern sacks of shit. also, IIRC, you could give your Hound treads too
I honestly have no qualms against either legs or treads, I'm fine with either one. I like the smooth/sleek look of Eastern mechs and the gritty/realistic look of Western ones, but find it difficult to choose a side. I find both to be pretty awesome in their own way, and wish to sort of mix them both together.
[QUOTE=Joazzz;40709296]ah yes i forgot about this thread's collective general hatred for anything that has legs instead of treads or wheels. yall should keep in mind that all mechs are fueled by the Rule of Cool, not the other thing called Common Sense. bitching about them having legs is waste of time, effort and energy
still, the Chromehounds are manifestations of gritty military realism if we compare them to Armored Core and other eastern sacks of shit. also, IIRC, you could give your Hound treads too[/QUOTE]
Treads were the best leg parts for your HOUND, in my opinion. Treads had some of the best mobility, maneuverability, acceleration, on-the-go accuracy, and most importantly an excellent combination of speed and load capacity. My treaded nadesniper was a monstrosity both up close and far away.
The Madcat didn't need treads to be good.
[img]http://static.desktopnexus.com/thumbnails/801825-bigthumbnail.jpg[/img]
I'll always be a fan of the SKS
[IMG]http://media.midwayusa.com/productimages/880x660/primary/896/896173.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.gbverrina.net/sito/exordimages/SKS_1.jpg[/IMG]
That top one can rot in a ditch for all I care..
Bottom one is made of win though.
Voulge
[t]http://www.thearma.org/Manuals/HW-Web_files/image018.jpg[/t]
pretty goddamn ugly, but still cool
[QUOTE=Luc1f3r;40709680]I'll always be a fan of the SKS
[IMG]http://media.midwayusa.com/productimages/880x660/primary/896/896173.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
what are you doing
[QUOTE=Araknid;40709885]what are you doing[/QUOTE]
posting a gun he likes the looks of
what the fuck do you think
Submitting my self-modeled semi-automatic/pump action magazine fed double barreled space shotgun under both coolest and ugliest.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/kC0fr1K.png[/img]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/I1xXo1G.png[/img]
My double barreled bastard blaster.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/uHXRAf3.png[/img]
Pump action mode fires both barrels at once. Semi auto fires barrels alternatingly. I dunno, I tried, and I'm rather proud of it :smile:
Take that here:
[url]http://facepunch.com/forumdisplay.php?f=40[/url]
Also:
CS/LS-5 submachine gun
[IMG]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/smg/china/1368428429.jpg[/IMG]
Looks like China took a 552 and a UMP and mashed them together.
And:
[IMG]http://www.weapon.ge/images/260_2.jpg[/IMG]
Is that magazine from an MP40?
[QUOTE=TehAgentGuy;40714738]Take that here:
[url]http://facepunch.com/forumdisplay.php?f=40[/url][/QUOTE]
Yeah, you're right, dunno what I was doing posting that. Somehow my brain made the connection that people post guns from games here, that fun is in my game, therefore even though my model is shit quality I should post it here. Sorry, momentary lapse of judgement and will not happen again.
[QUOTE=GussGriswold;40714926]Is that magazine from an MP40?[/QUOTE]
No they look similar but they aren't the same.
[QUOTE=GussGriswold;40714926]Is that magazine from an MP40?[/QUOTE]
No, I doubt an MP40 mag could reliably feed 9x18.
[QUOTE][IMG]http://media.midwayusa.com/productimages/880x660/primary/896/896173.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
That SKS Actually looks fair for a "tacticool" weapon.
is it just me or is just about every single person in this thread just eager to jump to "Tacticool sucks regardless of how its done fuck off" even if it turns out good?
that's
not
tacticool
tacticool is when it has an absurd amount of attachments on it to the point it becomes a hindrance
polymer stocks, rails, or scopes are not tacticool.
[QUOTE=0FucksGiven;40715149]that's
not
tacticool
tacticool is when it has an absurd amount of attachments on it to the point it becomes a hindrance
polymer stocks, rails, or scopes are not tacticool.[/QUOTE]
However they are quite ugly for an SKS.
[QUOTE=calebc789;40715105]That SKS Actually looks fair for a "tacticool" weapon.
is it just me or is just about every single person in this thread just eager to jump to "Tacticool sucks regardless of how its done fuck off" even if it turns out good?[/QUOTE]
The guy in the picture spent around $200 on an ugly stock to put on a $300 China-spec SKS, the stock will not improve ergonomics, accuracy or overall function. Basicly he wasted money to make an ugly ass SKS.
It does however remind me of MGS3 The End's Mosin.
[IMG]http://images.wikia.com/metalgear/images/7/71/The_End.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=snapshot32;40715251]The guy in the picture spent around $200 on an ugly stock to put on a $300 China-spec SKS, the stock will not improve ergonomics, accuracy or overall function. Basicly he wasted money to make an ugly ass SKS.[/QUOTE]
Ugly to you, he obviously liked it or he wouldn't drop 200 on it.
[QUOTE=MeltingData;40715510]Ugly to you, he obviously liked it or he wouldn't drop 200 on it.[/QUOTE]
True, he obviously seen it prudent to drop $200 on it. I just don't see the necessity.
Different strokes for different folks I guess.
[QUOTE=snapshot32;40715581]True, he obviously seen it prudent to drop $200 on it. I just don't see the necessity.
Different strokes for different folks I guess.[/QUOTE]
Well, Polymer is lighter than wood, the grip is more ergonomic and stock is adaptable for different arms. Rails allows for attachments, like scopes and such. I don't see why he shouldn't.
Type 97 AT rifle:
[IMG]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/atr/atr010/type_97.jpg[/IMG]
Carrying handles.
[img]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/atr/atr010/type_97_2.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=NightWig;40715621]Well, Polymer is lighter than wood, the grip is more ergonomic and stock is adaptable for different arms. Rails allows for attachments, like scopes and such. I don't see why he shouldn't.[/QUOTE]
Because at that point you're better off just buying an actual AK. 2-300 for the stock then 2-500 for the SKS (depending on nationality) would be more than enough to buy a very nice AK.
[QUOTE=NightWig;40715621]Well, Polymer is lighter than wood, the grip is more ergonomic and stock is adaptable for different arms. Rails allows for attachments, like scopes and such. I don't see why he shouldn't.[/QUOTE]
This is still kind of a moot point though since nobody who's interested in actual tactical stuff (not Tapco brand "tactical") will buy an SKS, 'cause the SKS is kind of ancient Russian milsurp at this point. It's basically shit for people who think rails and black plastic are cool but are too cheap/broke to buy an AR or something.
Ak's are 500 550 ish where I live. NY
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
