Coolest/Ugliest Weapons V5 - Bullpup AKs are the best
14,930 replies, posted
Personally, I prefer the originals. The K2 looks awesome without any rails or shit stuck to it.
At least it reminds me how cool the Shortdot is.
[t]http://www.defensereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Jeff_Gurwitch_AR-15_M4A1_Carbine_Tactical_Accessories_DefenseReview.com_DR_Pic_A.jpg[/t]
Also flashlight over bore. [I]OPERATOR done right.[/I]
[editline]8th November 2014[/editline]
That one's for you, asteroidrules.
[QUOTE=kaine123;46438501][IMG]https://38.media.tumblr.com/facc5017a4fe566d91301b058ab6f58e/tumblr_nbsq74KYqA1sr1lf3o1_1280.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
That's a... Creative solution to the cocking-handlle issue of MP5-length G3s.
[QUOTE=ossumsauce;46436982]SUSATs are terrible though[/QUOTE]
No, the SUSAT is the ultimate British optical solution. Made specifically to be complained about until people know how to use it, it can be used as a last resort as a miniature tritium release canister to ensure that you did something to whatever it was you were actually trying to hit.
Always seemed like a pretty awful reticle to me...
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0f/Susat1.jpg[/IMG]
Then again, the C79 Elcan reticle we use ain't [I]the best[/I] either.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/G34UhFL.png[/IMG]
Is there even a reticle that's visible in all conditions? If you put the Elcan's reticle on a dark background, you couldn't see shit with it
[QUOTE=Recurracy;46439374]Is there even a reticle that's visible in all conditions? If you put the Elcan's reticle on a dark background, you couldn't see shit with it[/QUOTE]
Elcan's tip lights up green in the dark, but you can't see that in daylight.
i thought the SUSAT also had a light up tip?
or is that just in STALKER
[QUOTE=inebriaticxp;46439679]i thought the SUSAT also had a light up tip?
or is that just in STALKER[/QUOTE]
Dunno. My problem with it is how friggin' fat it is, and it's lack of markings of any sort.
[QUOTE=Riller;46439419]Elcan's tip lights up green in the dark, but you can't see that in daylight.[/QUOTE]
shit didn't know that, that's awesome
[QUOTE=Riller;46439182]Always seemed like a pretty awful reticle to me...
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0f/Susat1.jpg[/IMG]
[/QUOTE]
I'll never get over that guy on the far left refposing
The Russian 1P29 has a pretty godawful reticle.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/XUwiSzg.png[/IMG]
At least not as bad as the SUSAT's daddy, the SUIT.
[IMG]http://www.ar15.com/ammo/project/OpticsReticles/Misc/TriLux.jpg[/IMG]
Upside-down SUSAT. [B]Which I just realized does have illumination I guess I'm an idiot sorry[/B][B].[/B]
Who needs a reticule when you can just have a big honkin' arrow to point out where you'll hit probably
[QUOTE=Sitkero;46440821]Who needs a reticule when you can just have a big honkin' arrow to point out where you'll hit probably[/QUOTE]
It needs to have a big label
"HEY DUDE YOUR BULLETS ARE GONNA HIT HERE KINDA PROBABLY LOL"
The easy operation of the SUSAT manual:
"if you can't see the guy you're trying to hit through your scope, chances are you're aiming right at him. if you still aren't hitting him, learn to compensate for distance you worthless shit"
May or may not have been written by a very angry sergeant
[QUOTE=Taggart;46441253]The easy operation of the SUSAT manual:
"if you can't see the guy you're trying to hit through your scope, chances are you're aiming right at him. if you still aren't hitting him, learn to compensate for distance you worthless shit"
May or may not have been written by a very angry sergeant[/QUOTE]
It [I]is[/I] a very humane sight, hiding the horrors and death of war behind a giant censor-bar so you can kill people without having to see the dirty business.
[QUOTE=inebriaticxp;46439679]i thought the SUSAT also had a light up tip?
or is that just in STALKER[/QUOTE]
SUSAT scopes are Tritium illuminated. Although considering how long they've been in service they should stop working pretty soon.
[QUOTE=Lone_Star94;46443151]The rails ruin the look of the revolver.[/QUOTE]
that ain't a revolver m8
[QUOTE=Pigbear;46443225]that ain't a revolver m8[/QUOTE]
uh, yeah it is? :v:
[QUOTE=Pigbear;46443225]that ain't a revolver m8[/QUOTE]
It is a handgun fed by a revolving cylinder
How is that not a revolver
[QUOTE=Sitkero;46443383]It is a handgun fed by a revolving cylinder
How is that not a revolver[/QUOTE]
looks like a mateba to me
[QUOTE=Pigbear;46443453]looks like a mateba to me[/QUOTE]
I'm fairly certain it's a Chiappa Rhino and even then, the Mateba is still a revolver, an automatic revolver, but a revolver nonetheless
[t]http://i.imgur.com/1XNvRsm.jpg [/t]
[editline]8th November 2014[/editline]
if only there was a way to find this stuff out.
[editline]8th November 2014[/editline]
also, pigbear, if you bothered to read the image you'd note it's referred to as a revolver several times.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/yWt5YFy.jpg[/IMG]
I really dig the elegant looks of a lot of mid 19th century percussion revolvers. Especially the Beaumont-Adams revolver.
Things which I was not aware of until today:
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c6/USMC_FA-18_Hornet.JPEG/800px-USMC_FA-18_Hornet.JPEG[/IMG]
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3e/FA-18_Hornet_VFA-41.jpg/800px-FA-18_Hornet_VFA-41.jpg[/IMG]
The F/A-18 Hornet and F/A-18 SuperHornet are not variants of the same aircraft.
[QUOTE=Riller;46445475]Things which I was not aware of until today:
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c6/USMC_FA-18_Hornet.JPEG/800px-USMC_FA-18_Hornet.JPEG[/IMG]
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3e/FA-18_Hornet_VFA-41.jpg/800px-FA-18_Hornet_VFA-41.jpg[/IMG]
The F/A-18 Hornet and F/A-18 SuperHornet are not variants of the same aircraft.[/QUOTE]
What are they then?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
