Coolest/Ugliest Weapons V5 - Bullpup AKs are the best
14,930 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;41025066]Didn't the Nagant's only design the floor plate for the magazine or something for the Mosin?
Arguing gun semantics in a thread about guns, how silly of me.[/QUOTE]
This the Coolest weapons thread. The [url=http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RuleOfCool]Rule of Cool[/url] is in effect and thus, everything should be taken light heartedly.
[QUOTE=butre;41022584]Those pellets were made of lead. If you chewed on one you probably have pretty nasty brain damage now[/QUOTE]
Not really.
And I could eat a hundred lead pellets and still be less brain damaged than most of the U.S.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;41025066]Didn't the Nagant's only design the floor plate for the magazine or something for the Mosin?
Arguing gun semantics in a thread about guns, how silly of me.[/QUOTE]
He didn't even do that. Nagant thought up welding the magazine spring to the floorplate in his entry to the same program, mosin liked the idea and welded down his mag spring, nagant through a bitch fit and sued for IP theft.
[QUOTE=Tinter;41025454]This the Coolest weapons thread. The [url=http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RuleOfCool]Rule of Cool[/url] is in effect and thus, everything should be taken light heartedly.[/QUOTE]
It's still dumb to call things something they're not.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;41026531]It's still dumb to call things something they're not.[/QUOTE]
yeah with the stick-up-your-ass lexicon of yours.
i'm sorry i don't spend my nights on wikipedia looking up how a fucking rifle was produced.
it's understandable with something like clips and magazines, but something as specific as this? come on. and if you're going to correct me you don't have to be a douche about it?
[url=http://www.sporcle.com/games/Zillamaster55/firearms-of-world-war-2-and-their-country-of-origin]Play my quiz, do it[/url]
[editline]13th June 2013[/editline]
Keywords: Of [U]Origin[/U]
[QUOTE=FoodStuffs;41027447]yeah with the stick-up-your-ass lexicon of yours.
i'm sorry i don't spend my nights on wikipedia looking up how a fucking rifle was produced.
it's understandable with something like clips and magazines, but something as specific as this? come on. and if you're going to correct me you don't have to be a douche about it?[/QUOTE]
It's not obscure or overly specific at all. A nagant is a pistol, A mosin nagant is the rifle, the 2 aren't interchangeable.
kinda is because more people know about the rifle than the pistol.
not only that but they're over a century old, i think that makes them pretty obscure.
[editline]13th June 2013[/editline]
this is how slang is created actually.
was watching terminator salvation and couldn't get over how sweet his modded hk looked
[IMG]http://www.imfdb.org/images/c/c4/TermSalv_07.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=FoodStuffs;41027569]kinda is because more people know about the rifle than the pistol.
not only that but they're over a century old, i think that makes them pretty obscure.
[editline]13th June 2013[/editline]
this is how slang is created actually.[/QUOTE]
The 1911 is a century old and it's by no means obscure. Theres been roughly 38 million mosin nagant variants made by many many different countries, and over 2 million Nagants made by Russia. Both the mosin and Nagant have served in every Russian war since 1895 to even recent Chechen conflicts. They are by no means obscure or unseen.
Sure thats how slang is made but it doesn't make it any less wrong.
the 1911 was the main sidearm for nearly a century of pretty much the biggest superpower of the past 100 years.
i don't even know how russia considered itself a superpower sometimes.
also Afghanistan is on the news, Chechnya isn't.
it's simply lesser known. and for the most part only gun nuts would know about either weapon. mosin, nagant or the comination of the two rings practically no bells in comparison to [I]Colt[/I]
Stop fighting and post guns
[video=youtube;Xq8uyB091Dw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xq8uyB091Dw[/video]
and predecessor to a variety of modern household name firearms
[QUOTE=Rofl_copter;41027611]was watching terminator salvation and couldn't get over how sweet his modded hk looked
[/QUOTE]
-dboys/agm airsoft 416 with wrong stock- $150-$180
-fake c-more- $25
-weird flip up sights that i cant tell what they are-$20?
-huge flashlight with mounting rings- $40
[QUOTE=FoodStuffs;41027569]kinda is because more people know about the rifle than the pistol.
not only that but they're over a century old, i think that makes them pretty obscure.
[editline]13th June 2013[/editline]
this is how slang is created actually.[/QUOTE]
rome is 28 centuries old and by no means obscure
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;41027476][url=http://www.sporcle.com/games/Zillamaster55/firearms-of-world-war-2-and-their-country-of-origin]Play my quiz, do it[/url]
[editline]13th June 2013[/editline]
Keywords: Of [U]Origin[/U][/QUOTE]
20/20
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;41027476][url=http://www.sporcle.com/games/Zillamaster55/firearms-of-world-war-2-and-their-country-of-origin]Play my quiz, do it[/url]
[editline]13th June 2013[/editline]
Keywords: Of [U]Origin[/U][/QUOTE]
20/20
John Garand is originally from Canada but was an American Citizen living in the USA when he designed the M1. The M1 Garand is an American rifle.
[QUOTE=Taggart;41025049]Doesn't even post a Lee-Enfield what a bolt-action peasant
FEAST your eyes upon the GLORY of BRITANNIA
[IMG]http://www.imfdb.org/images/2/27/SMLE.jpg[/IMG]
The Lee-Enfield No.1 Mk III*, the glorious main rifle of the glorious Commonwealth during the First World War
[IMG]http://www.imfdb.org/images/9/9a/LeeEnfield4Rifle.jpg[/IMG]
The Lee-Enfield No.4 Mk I, the glorious main rifle (along with the No.1 Mk III*) of the glorious Commonwealth during the Second World War
And with that, God Save The Queen![/QUOTE]
In Australia they stuck with the MK. III* throughout the second world war
[editline]14th June 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=Rofl_copter;41027611]was watching terminator salvation and couldn't get over how sweet his modded hk looked
[IMG]http://www.imfdb.org/images/c/c4/TermSalv_07.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
I really like C-More sights
[QUOTE=download;41029256]In Australia they stuck with the MK. III* throughout the second world war
[/QUOTE]
Twas also used by the UK in Africa iirc
[QUOTE=FoodStuffs;41027695]the 1911 was the main sidearm for nearly a century of pretty much the biggest superpower of the past 100 years.
i don't even know how russia considered itself a superpower sometimes.
also Afghanistan is on the news, Chechnya isn't.
it's simply lesser known. and for the most part only gun nuts would know about either weapon. mosin, nagant or the comination of the two rings practically no bells in comparison to [I]Colt[/I][/QUOTE]
Are you fucking serious?
[h2]The mosin nagant was the main fucking service rifle for the Russians during WWII[/h2], as well as the Finnish, [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosin%E2%80%93Nagant#Users"]and all these fuckers[/URL]. The Mosin nagant IS STILL used by TALIBAN AND IRAQI INSURGETS TO THIS DAY. It was used actively against US troops during the Vietnam war as a battle rifle and sniper rifle. The Nagants were given out alongside Tokarevs and I have no doubt that the taliban and other islamist insurgent groups still use them.
By your logic, the STG-44, first ever assault rifle, is obscure.
Chechnya isn't on the news anymore because Russia isn't actively invading it all the time anymore.
oh my god dude drop it seriously. i'm not even going to mention the gun in this post. we've moved on. this isn't a battle or even a debate. it's stupid banter about stupid shit in a place where we celebrate glorious firearms. guns, things we've loved ever since we played army in the fucking woods.
i mean ask yourself what the fuck is accomplished in continuing this. you aren't going to change my mind and i'm not going to change yours. i'll stand here and be an ignoramus and you can have your stick wedged... where-ever and we can agree to disagree.
why are people so combative here. i mean i understand passion but this is just downright aggressive. and all it does it just breed more bad vibes and ill will. i'm not saying i'm a saint by any fucking means, but can we chill here?
[QUOTE=FoodStuffs;41029673]oh my god dude drop it seriously. i'm not even going to mention the gun in this post. we've moved on. this isn't a battle or even a debate. it's stupid banter about stupid shit in a place where we celebrate glorious firearms. guns, things we've loved ever since we played army in the fucking woods.
i mean ask yourself what the fuck is accomplished in continuing this. you aren't going to change my mind and i'm not going to change yours. i'll stand here and be an ignoramus and you can have your stick wedged... where-ever and we can agree to disagree.
why are people so combative here. i mean i understand passion but this is just downright aggressive. and all it does it just breed more bad vibes and ill will. i'm not saying i'm a saint by any fucking means, but can we chill here?[/QUOTE]
you're trying to justify calling one gun by the name of another gun
[quote]look at this steyr aug
[t]http://imgkk.com/i/4g6p.jpg[/t][/quote]
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;41027494]It's not obscure or overly specific at all. A nagant is a pistol, A mosin nagant is the rifle, the 2 aren't interchangeable.[/QUOTE]
no one gives a rat's shitty disease-ridden ass
please be quiet and leave so you stop pissing off everyone
it's stupid, you got called out on it, and then you threw a bitch fit and screamed "OH MY FUCKING GOD SEMANTICS EVERYWHERE" like a big fat baby
[QUOTE=kaine123;41024480]Errybody post your fav bolt-action.[/QUOTE]
They haven't changed since [URL="http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1259860&p=40345342&viewfull=1#post40345342"]the last time you asked[/URL].
[QUOTE=Raijin;40345487][img]http://i.imgur.com/gK5kJuf.jpg[/img]
AWM/AWP or L96A1
[img]http://i.imgur.com/ZJfz4b4.jpg[/img]
Barrett M99
[img]http://i.imgur.com/YsOYDKe.jpg[/img]
M40
[img]http://i.imgur.com/0e9p8sg.jpg[/img]
M1903 Springfield[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Jagur;40968962]It's basically a 'high capacity revolver' with the idea of using triangular shaped rounds instead of the usual cartridges
[img]http://www.cornellpubs.com/Images4/dardick_1958.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
I'm sorry but I can imagine this jamming quite fast
[QUOTE=Recurracy;41030264]I'm sorry but I can imagine this jamming quite fast[/QUOTE]
it didn't really have any jamming issues at all that weren't due to user error
yeah how exactly does the cartridge ejection system work?
like at all? does it rely on the cylinder cycling fast enough so there's enough momentum to throw the case out or something? cause that sounds insanely shoddy. if it doesn't it looks like the hot casings just tumble down the side... onto the hand of the user
[editline]13th June 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=butre;41030309]it didn't really have any jamming issues at all that weren't due to user error[/QUOTE]
those are kinda still jamming issues. even if they aren't inherent to the gun you still need to take the user into account otherwise without a user it's a stapler.
not taking human error into account is a serious mistake and a pretty bad oversight.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
