[QUOTE=chunkymonkey;18857898]Then how is not rendering properly for you? There should be no problem unless you have a monitor the size of a quarter.[/QUOTE]
1024x600 :frown:
[QUOTE=Joppu;18856992]I have also web design, I made this: (Valid HTML5+CSS)
[media]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/805039/img/capture.png[/media]
(tagged due to size)
Getting to this point only took 3 classes for me. The other people are mostly doing stuff that looks like "my first webpage 1999" with all their ugly bg colors and <marquee> tags, urgh...[/QUOTE]
Huh, not bad for 3 classes. (I don't know to code at all by the way)
The design itself is pretty boring and relatively bad though.
Haha, I was trying to find out what avatar Chunky had that was so "awesome" as Joppu said, but I just couldn't find him.
Then I realized I was looking at Chunky's and not Joppu's avatar.
[QUOTE=dgg;18858767]Huh, not bad for 3 classes. (I don't know to code at all by the way)
[I]The design itself is pretty boring and relatively bad though.[/I][/QUOTE]
Thanks man!
Mind to elaborate?
I was kinda aiming for something lightweight without tons of images for main layout.
[QUOTE=dgg;18858767]Huh, not bad for 3 classes. (I don't know to code at all by the way)
The design itself is pretty boring and relatively bad though.
Haha, I was trying to find out what avatar Chunky had that was so "awesome" as Joppu said, but I just couldn't find him.
Then I realized I was looking at Chunky's and not Joppu's avatar.[/QUOTE]
Yeah it's pretty coo if I do say so myself.
[QUOTE=Kabuto;18854375]Brb, getting 667 more posts.[/QUOTE]
881 over here. :downsrim:
[QUOTE=Joppu;18858867]Thanks man!
Mind to elaborate?
I was kinda aiming for something lightweight without tons of images for main layout.[/QUOTE]
It's bland.
I was catching up on Railgun when I noticed this nice little Shigofumi reference:
[media]http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/243/railgunmacindowsos.jpg[/media]
In Shigofumi:
[media]http://img693.imageshack.us/img693/7296/shigofumimacindows.png[/media]
I like J.C a little bit more now.
[QUOTE=Joppu;18858972]It's simplistic, minimalist.[/QUOTE]
Ok, it's still bland. You can have simplistic and still have something nice looking.
[QUOTE=Joppu;18858867]Thanks man! Mind to elaborate?
I was kinda aiming for something lightweight without tons of images for main layout.[/QUOTE]
First of all there is way too many 1px borders. On the right side there are three of them right next to each other, differently spaced from eachother, one has "a lot" of room whilst the other is almost having gay sex with the other border. Give some more space between the borders and try to make the distance the same between them so that it's more pleasing and systematic for the eye.
The title texts are way too close to the left side. Make use of all the room that are in those small blue boxes, space them more out in it to give some breathing room for the text so it doesn't smear itself and blend in with the border. I would also recommend some less plain font. Still plainish, but not super plain. Fonts with serifs (in case you don't know; extra stuff on the text, look at Times New Roman (serifs) against Calibri (no serifs) and you'll know what I mean) are easier on the eye actually, but you should keep the main text in a no-serif font. But you need some font contrast between the text and the titles to make it more interesting.
Naviagtion lacks a capital N. Give some more breathing space for the content of the naviagion box, a pixel or two more on the bottom and top should do it. The arrows are also spaced a bit too far away from the text IMO, makes it look like it isn't supposed to be an arrow for the text, but rather just an arrow. It's understandable what it is, but it doesn't really look like it if you're just going to look at it. A pixel or two closer to the text should do it here too.
Header is ok I guess. Though I'm not that much of a fan of the font you used and the J doesn't look capitalized. But the impression of the font can change when you get some font contrast in the page itself.
[QUOTE=Joppu;18858972]It's simplistic, minimalist.[/QUOTE]
You probably didn't mean it this way at all, but minalistic/simplistic =/= bland. Not at all.
If it's bland, then it is bland. If it is minimalistic, then it is minimalistic.
The one word is used positively and the other negatively. You wouldn't call something bland if it was minimalistic. You would call it bland if you found it bland, and that isn't specific to any genre.
[QUOTE=dgg;18859168]First of all there is way too many 1px borders. On the right side there are three of them right next to each other, differently spaced from eachother, one has "a lot" of room whilst the other is almost having gay sex with the other border. Give some more space between the borders and try to make the distance the same between them so that it's more pleasing and systematic for the eye.
The title texts are way too close to the left side. Make use of all the room that are in those small blue boxes, space them more out in it to give some breathing room for the text so it doesn't smear itself and blend in with the border. I would also recommend some less plain font. Still plainish, but not super plain. Fonts with serifs (in case you don't know; extra stuff on the text, look at Times New Roman (serifs) against Calibri (no serifs) and you'll know what I mean) are easier on the eye actually, but you should keep the main text in a no-serif font. But you need some font contrast between the text and the titles to make it more interesting.
Naviagtion lacks a capital N. Give some more breathing space for the content of the naviagion box, a pixel or two more on the bottom and top should do it. The arrows are also spaced a bit too far away from the text IMO, makes it look like it isn't supposed to be an arrow for the text, but rather just an arrow. It's understandable what it is, but it doesn't really look like it if you're just going to look at it. A pixel or two closer to the text should do it here too.
Header is ok I guess. Though I'm not that much of a fan of the font you used and the J doesn't look capitalized. But the impression of the font can change when you get some font contrast in the page itself.
You probably didn't mean it this way at all, but minalistic/simplistic =/= bland. Not at all.
If it's bland, then it is bland. If it is minimalistic, then it is minimalistic.
The one word is used positively and the other negatively. You wouldn't call something bland if it was minimalistic. You would call it bland if you found it bland, and that isn't specific to any genre.[/QUOTE]
Damn your knowledge of digital arts! :argh:
[QUOTE=dgg;18859168]First of all there is way too many 1px borders. On the right side there are three of them right next to each other, differently spaced from eachother, one has "a lot" of room whilst the other is almost having gay sex with the other border. Give some more space between the borders and try to make the distance the same between them so that it's more pleasing and systematic for the eye.
Naviagtion lacks a capital N. Give some more breathing space for the content of the naviagion box, a pixel or two more on the bottom and top should do it. The arrows are also spaced a bit too far away from the text IMO, makes it look like it isn't supposed to be an arrow for the text, but rather just an arrow. It's understandable what it is, but it doesn't really look like it if you're just going to look at it. A pixel or two closer to the text should do it here too.[/QUOTE]
Thanks! Valid feedback, will look into this.
[QUOTE=dgg;18859168]The title texts are way too close to the left side. Make use of all the room that are in those small blue boxes, space them more out in it to give some breathing room for the text so it doesn't smear itself and blend in with the border. I would also recommend some less plain font. Still plainish, but not super plain. Fonts with serifs (in case you don't know; extra stuff on the text, look at Times New Roman (serifs) against Calibri (no serifs) and you'll know what I mean) are easier on the eye actually, but you should keep the main text in a no-serif font. But you need some font contrast between the text and the titles to make it more interesting.[/QUOTE]
I [I]never ever never[/I] use serifed font everywhere. Actually, Times New Roman is the font I hate most, same class as Papyrus and Comic Sans MS. :v:
[QUOTE=dgg;18859168]Header is ok I guess. Though I'm not that much of a fan of the font you used and the J doesn't look capitalized. But the impression of the font can change when you get some font contrast in the page itself.[/QUOTE]
It doesn't matter. I love Neo Sans Intel. Also my nick not supposed to be capitalized, I have changed my mind since 2007. :smile:
how the hell did some of you get gold member?
Over 2 years of membership, over 2000 psots.
brb, let me dig out my old 06 account
wasn't that perma'd
DTB S2 Ep 10 is out. And going ridiculously slow on my dad's awesome internet connection. 0.5kb/s :ohdear:
[QUOTE=NachoPiggy;18859500]wasn't that perma'd[/QUOTE]
"nubcakez" is a Jan 08 account, I also have a 07 and a 06 account that are rarely used
new avatar
[editline]fake lol[/editline]
waah
/me jealous
[QUOTE=Joppu;18859352]Actually, Times New Roman is the font I hate most, same class as Papyrus and Comic Sans MS. :v:
It doesn't matter. I love Neo Sans Intel. Also my nick not supposed to be capitalized, I have changed my mind since 2007. :smile:[/QUOTE]
Me neither, I'm most fond of plain text like this, most beloved would actually be the standard Calibri font and the Franklin fonts. But you really need some font contrast on that page, and Times New Roman was just an example of the difference for everyone to see.
There are serif fonts out there that looks good. Hell, pretty much any font has serifs. Grunge fonts, psycho fonts, handwritten fonts, whatever. They all have serifs.
Capitalizing the first letter always matters, especially on a header that takes the most first impression attention. Unless there is a very specific reason for it not to be which I can not see. At all.
[QUOTE=chunkymonkey;18859307]Damn your knowledge of digital arts! :argh:[/QUOTE]
That's pretty much all I got about it too though. Knowledge, knowledge, knowledge. No fucking imagination and creativity.
i love the calibri font.
[QUOTE=thelinx;18859889]new avatar
[editline]fake lol[/editline]
waah[/QUOTE]
Hey can you find me an avatar at the same size as you but is Sakuya idling (basically my avatar just bigger.)?
along with impact.
[editline]01:43PM[/editline]
automerrrrrrrrgeee RAge
You guys should make a community forum called Anime Downtown and then have some guy from alabama host the steam group, sounds like an awesome idea.
i am already on enough forums as is (3)
[QUOTE=NorthernGate;18860318]You guys should make a community forum called Anime Downtown and then have some guy from antarctica host the steam group, sounds like an awesome idea.[/QUOTE]
:raise:
[QUOTE=RaptorRed;18860265]Hey can you find me an avatar at the same size as you but is Sakuya idling (basically my avatar just bigger.)?[/QUOTE]
I can try.
[QUOTE=thelinx;18860382]I can try.[/QUOTE]
Thank you.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
