This just in: Apparently Imageshack is A shit Image Host

[smurfy]

I used to use ImageShack but it's slow as fuck these days. Imgkk forever baby.

[FightForCherno]

what's wrong here

i don't even

[smurfy]

Photobucket and ImageShack are too big and bloated. Imgkk is just Click upload, select file, you're done.

Not to mention easy rehosting with the Firefox addon. Whenever I want to post a screenie or something I rehost it on Imgkk so it won't end up being a broken link.

[Watevaman]

I use Imageshack because that's where I happened to make an account back in 2005. I've only had problems a few times with them, and even then it was for a few hours.

[Uber|nooB]

cubeupload > imageshack

[Kondor]

[QUOTE=Uber|nooB;15979626]cubeupload > imageshack[/QUOTE]

Oh cool it's back up again. I thought it was taken over by arabs or something

[Uber|nooB]

huh what

[Zalador]

yeah i prefer cubeupload too

[Krinkels]

Why the heck is photobucket better?
It's always all like "bandwidth exceeded bitch, you can't see this image because it uses too much awesome and you're missing out because I'm a shit host with a tiny bandwidth limit."

[Paintry]

Although this thread is over 2 years old, he was right.