[QUOTE=rnate;34815513]Throwing a lot of lead down range is fun, but accurately hitting targets is a lot more fun to me. Both have their advantages.[/QUOTE]
The Arisaka was bolt action, so your point is moot
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;34826899]The Arisaka was bolt action, so your point is moot[/QUOTE]
No sane person should ever fire any of those weapons. Your completely fucking bonkers if you shoot any of them from late in the war.
[QUOTE=N-12_Aden;34827193]No sane person should ever fire any of those weapons. Your completely fucking bonkers if you shoot any of them from late in the war.[/QUOTE]
Wait, why? Poorly manufactured?
[QUOTE=ewitwins;34827562]Wait, why? Poorly manufactured?[/QUOTE]
Extremely.
From what I have read they used shit materials, shit labor, and often did it too quick.
This goes for all the Arisakas, Nambu pistols, those LMGs they used, grenades, you name it.
[QUOTE=N-12_Aden;34827590]Extremely.
From what I have read they used shit materials, shit labor, and often did it too quick.
This goes for all the Arisakas, Nambu pistols, those LMGs they used, [b]grenades[/b], you name it.[/QUOTE]
If you have seen some Jap Grenades for sale, I want to know.
[QUOTE=ewitwins;34827562]Wait, why? Poorly manufactured?[/QUOTE]
Last Ditch Rifles.
Production on them was so rushed that there were even rifles made that were held together by one bolt.
[QUOTE=$$>MUFFIN<$$;34828209]If you have seen some Jap Grenades for sale, I want to know.[/QUOTE]
Just emphasizing how badly produced nearly all the Japanese kit was.
Yeah, 1945 weapons from Japan were basically something for the soldier to hold while he was gunned down by Allied marines.
That's odd, I recall hearing that Arisakas were actually pretty decent rifles.
[QUOTE=jimhowl33t;34832843]That's odd, I recall hearing that Arisakas were actually pretty decent rifles.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, the ones not fucked up in manufacturing. From what I understand its pretty much a standard bolt action rifle, not much exceptional but nothing inherently wrong with its design.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/Cr7bs.jpg[/img]
What's with the pipe attached at the bottom?
[QUOTE=jimhowl33t;34833525]What's with the pipe attached at the bottom?[/QUOTE]
lol so you can't conceal it and try to carry it. As if it was concealable without the pipe.
[QUOTE=Aman VII;34833541]lol so you can't conceal it and try to carry it. As if it was concealable without the pipe.[/QUOTE]
Reminds me of this :v:
[MEDIA][url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmqNMc0IDWE[/url][/MEDIA]
Clearly a concealed long barreled revolver has the potential to shoot down aircraft.
[QUOTE=Aman VII;34833108][img]http://i.imgur.com/Cr7bs.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Oh look, a UK legal handgun.
[img]http://oi42.tinypic.com/1pxrpt.jpg[/img]
what are you doing cat
you cannot commit suicide
your arms aren't even long enough to reach the trigger
what rifle is that?
[QUOTE=jimhowl33t;34833525]What's with the pipe attached at the bottom?[/QUOTE]
A counterweight for the barrel
[QUOTE=PrusseluskenV2;34833848]Fuck, now I want a custom rifle..
Receiver
[t]http://butlerarmsusa.com/defiance/wp-content/gallery/ejection_ports/sheep_ejection_port.jpg[/t]
Tang
[t]http://butlerarmsusa.com/defiance/wp-content/gallery/rear_tang/sheep.jpg[/t]
Bolt handle
[t]http://butlerarmsusa.com/defiance/wp-content/gallery/bolt_knobs/tactical_bolt_knob.jpg[/t]
Bolt head
[t]http://butlerarmsusa.com/defiance/wp-content/gallery/bolt_noses/cone_bolt_nose.jpg[/t]
Fluting on bolt
[t]http://butlerarmsusa.com/defiance/wp-content/gallery/flutes/shallow_flutes.jpg[/t]
Receiver and parts would be $1100-1300
Then I'd need a barrel and a stock + optics
:suicide:[/QUOTE]
Mother of God that's sexy.
I love what they did to the bolt, that's incredible. I wonder if the curve matches the rifling of the barrel on the gun this is meant for?
Tbh that is ridiculous price.
You could get a competition set up cheaper then that i think.
Agreed. I'd say over a thousand bucks for just an action (a manual one at that) seems pretty ridiculous and unnecessary.
fuck yes, got a 1941 Lithgow SMLE mk.3 with matching numbers for $450
[img_thumb]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/48521896/L1010687.JPG[/img_thumb]
[img_thumb]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/48521896/L1010685.JPG[/img_thumb]
That's the good thing about Australia, enfields are dirt cheap.
That fucking stock. Can it be anymore perfect!
[url]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2012/02/24/magpulized-russian-dragunov-svd-rifle/[/url]
Confirmed for Modern Warfare 4 :v:
[img]http://cdn5.thefirearmsblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/swd_modernized_05_x_resize-tm-tfb.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Campin Carl;34846078][url]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2012/02/24/magpulized-russian-dragunov-svd-rifle/[/url]
Confirmed for Modern Warfare 4 :v:
[img]http://cdn5.thefirearmsblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/swd_modernized_05_x_resize-tm-tfb.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
r.i.p
[editline]24th February 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;34845920]That fucking stock. Can it be anymore perfect![/QUOTE]
Yeah, it could be by not having a fucked upper handguard.
Oh shit just noticed that, I'm sure a little work could fix that though.
[QUOTE=Campin Carl;34846078][url]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2012/02/24/magpulized-russian-dragunov-svd-rifle/[/url]
Confirmed for Modern Warfare 4 :v:
[img]http://cdn5.thefirearmsblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/swd_modernized_05_x_resize-tm-tfb.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
How is this even an SVD?
[QUOTE=koekje4life V2;34846567]How is this even an SVD?[/QUOTE]
There's a poor Dragunov under all that plastic. Probably begging for help. Or euthanasia.
[QUOTE=koekje4life V2;34846567]How is this even an SVD?[/QUOTE]
Uh... the magazine... maybe. Damn I thought that was some Advanced American Sniper Rifle and the link was a pic of an SVD... That monster should be destroyed... preferably with fire.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cb/Type_06_rifle_grenade.jpg[/t]
The Japanese defense force will kick all of our asses.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.