• The Creative Photography Thread - If It Ain't Bokeh, Don't Fix It
    5,000 replies, posted
Pick, love that one of your grandparents... you get such a feeling of personality through the photograph.
Another from Wednesday, man she made my life easy [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/jhaslehurst/5512118632/][img]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5131/5512118632_c9a295afb8_z.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/jhaslehurst/5512118632/]in the reflection of the window[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/jhaslehurst/]jhaslehurst[/url], on Flickr
Damn, I'd love a 30mm 1.4 Great shot by the way. I love those old Australian shopping arcades. Unlike anywhere else I know, they certainly have a distinct style. Cool and breezy, federation tiles and cast iron. Lovely. [editline]10th March 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Scotchair;28524039]Pick, love that one of your grandparents... you get such a feeling of personality through the photograph.[/QUOTE] Thanks dude.
[QUOTE=rieda1589;28523851]I think there needs to be more of a gradient between blurred and non-blurred.[/QUOTE] yeah, study some photos taken with actual tilt lenses and you should be able to mimic it well fairly easily
ok,i need some hommie help. i have a budget of around $500 and i need a DSLR. is there one you guys would recommend? what is the best dslr for $500? i would like it to have video recording.
[QUOTE=labbet;28525257]ok,i need some hommie help. i have a budget of around $500 and i need a DSLR. is there one you guys would recommend? what is the best dslr for $500? i would like it to have video recording.[/QUOTE] [url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/888650-the-quot-Which-camera-is-right-for-me-quot-Megathread[/url]
ive been looking at the Nikon D3100. is that a good choice? [editline]10th March 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Pickwickian-;28525273][url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/888650-the-quot-Which-camera-is-right-for-me-quot-Megathread[/url][/QUOTE] ok sorry.
Experimenting with shilloutee/bokeh. [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/58669118@N02/5509861498/][img]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5056/5509861498_18077a410f_z.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/58669118@N02/5509861498/]Staring at the water[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/58669118@N02/]Isaac Brownbridge[/url], on Flickr I don't really like it, but thought I would post it anyway.
[QUOTE=daijitsu;28519084]:siren:[h2]effective immediately, a "Look but do not touch" clause is now in effect.[/h2]:siren: [/QUOTE] In all honesty I don't think it's a bad photo even though it's over processed. I think it could work there if it was just toned down a bit. Otherwise it's a fine photo.
[QUOTE=labbet;28525306]ive been looking at the Nikon D3100. is that a good choice[/QUOTE] Pentax K-X. I regret buying a D3100 because of the retarded lens compatibility. Or get another 200 bucks and get a Canon T2i/550D or the Sony equivalent.
The a33 is pretty cool if you don't mind the EVF and stupid hot shoe.
[QUOTE=B-hazard;28526434]Experimenting with shilloutee/bokeh. [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/58669118@N02/5509861498/][img_thumb]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5056/5509861498_18077a410f_z.jpg[/img_thumb][/url] [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/58669118@N02/5509861498/]Staring at the water[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/58669118@N02/]Isaac Brownbridge[/url], on Flickr I don't really like it, but thought I would post it anyway.[/QUOTE] I like it a lot. The silhouette is really nice and the bokeh is kinda neat, only thing that bugs me is the blur on the trees
[QUOTE=The Un-Men;28531080]Pentax K-X. I regret buying a D3100 because of the retarded lens compatibility. Or get another 200 bucks and get a Canon T2i/550D or the Sony equivalent.[/QUOTE] whats the problem with the lens compatibility? the nikon has more megapixels.
[QUOTE=labbet;28534511]whats the problem with the lens compatibility? the nikon has more megapixels.[/QUOTE] Megapixels are worth jackshit unless you're gonna do any big prints. Don't use that as a factor to decide which camera to buy. There's a lot of lenses that won't autofocus, or not even meter if you mount them. I'm not even talking about 30 year old lenses; there's a whole chart on Nikon lens compatibility even with modern ones. Now don't get me wrong Nikon does good stuff but their entry level stuff is miles behind Canon/Pentax/Sony/Olympus [editline]10th March 2011[/editline] Eh... There's little to do if you've already decided to buy it. Enjoy it and learn its limitations.
i took pictures today [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/gregorybernardjones/5515765081/][img]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5092/5515765081_29ee99c14c.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/gregorybernardjones/5515765081/]Derk Coloring Things[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/gregorybernardjones/]BernieBones[/url], on Flickr [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/gregorybernardjones/5515762731/][img]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5017/5515762731_43a8087d65.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/gregorybernardjones/5515762731/]Ram[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/gregorybernardjones/]BernieBones[/url], on Flickr [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/gregorybernardjones/5516349820/][img]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5257/5516349820_8e466b6d48.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/gregorybernardjones/5516349820/]Numbers[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/gregorybernardjones/]BernieBones[/url], on Flickr [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/gregorybernardjones/5516346248/][img]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5054/5516346248_1c89511ba3.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/gregorybernardjones/5516346248/]Control[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/gregorybernardjones/]BernieBones[/url], on Flickr [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/gregorybernardjones/5516342542/][img]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5291/5516342542_e6b37fb7f5.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/gregorybernardjones/5516342542/]Rain[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/gregorybernardjones/]BernieBones[/url], on Flickr
[QUOTE=The Un-Men;28534925]Megapixels are worth jackshit unless you're gonna do any big prints. Don't use that as a factor to decide which camera to buy. There's a lot of lenses that won't autofocus, or not even meter if you mount them. I'm not even talking about 30 year old lenses; there's a whole chart on Nikon lens compatibility even with modern ones. Now don't get me wrong Nikon does good stuff but their entry level stuff is miles behind Canon/Pentax/Sony/Olympus [editline]10th March 2011[/editline] Eh... There's little to do if you've already decided to buy it. Enjoy it and learn its limitations.[/QUOTE] i haven't bought it yet. the problem is is that the D3100 isn't even Nikon lowest price DSLR and its cheaper than canons cheapest DSLR. i'll look around some more. pentax does have that red camera...:buddy:
Man, I really want to know how do you guys get such awesome tonings in your picture making it a huge difference from the one taken and after being processed
I just followed a bunch of examples/tutorials and mixed and matched depending on my liking.
I can't wait to post the pictures I took! Seagulls attacked my friend, my sandwich and I, so I got closeups.
The Canon 1000D is a great beginner DSLR... fantatic value for money, I managed to get a hold of a like new 450D for the same price as a 1000D though so look around... best part is Canon lenses fit any canon camera, so when you upgrade you dont have to worry about lenses not fitting. Also, this has become the only thread I bother with on FP, I really appreciate you guys... keep being awesome.
[QUOTE=Scotchair;28537705]The Canon 1000D is a great beginner DSLR... fantatic value for money, I managed to get a hold of a like new 450D for the same price as a 1000D though so look around... best part is Canon lenses fit any canon camera, so when you upgrade you dont have to worry about lenses not fitting. Also, this has become the only thread I bother with on FP, I really appreciate you guys... keep being awesome.[/QUOTE] EF-S lenses don't fit full frame camera because the rear element would get in the way of the mirror.
[QUOTE=Scotchair;28537705]best part is Canon lenses fit any canon camera, so when you upgrade you dont have to worry about lenses not fitting. [/QUOTE] what if you upgrade to a full-frame, do EF-S fit on those [QUOTE=Unreliable;28538153]I wish I could provide evidence as to how amazing pentax works at high ISO. It was a thread on /p/ where he did comparisons of cameras at 1600(?). Pentax came out on top. Though, it was the K-7, so I'm not sure about their entry level.[/QUOTE] you can find direct ISO comparison images on [url]www.dpreview.com[/url] sorry about all the gear talk in this thread BTW
[QUOTE=labbet;28535463]i haven't bought it yet. the problem is is that the D3100 isn't even Nikon lowest price DSLR and its cheaper than canons cheapest DSLR. i'll look around some more. pentax does have that red camera...:buddy:[/QUOTE] I wish I could provide evidence as to how amazing pentax works at high ISO. It was a thread on /p/ where he did comparisons of cameras at 1600(?). Pentax came out on top. Though, it was the K-7, so I'm not sure about their entry level.
[QUOTE=Scotchair;28537705]The Canon 1000D is a great beginner DSLR... fantatic value for money, I managed to get a hold of a like new 450D for the same price as a 1000D though so look around... best part is Canon lenses fit any canon camera, so when you upgrade you dont have to worry about lenses not fitting. Also, this has become the only thread I bother with on FP, I really appreciate you guys... keep being awesome.[/QUOTE] I thought EF-S lenses aren't able to be mounted on full frame cameras? Ninja'd.
they aren't.
[QUOTE=Klammyxxl;28535193]i took pictures today pics[/QUOTE] The first, the third and the fifth one are gorgeous. These photos are my favourite type of photos, as they show the warmth of imperfection :)
My bad, sorry lads...
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/cXpSc.jpg[/IMG] It's snowing again ugh... CC please
[QUOTE=Nonikai;28544587][img_thumb]http://i.imgur.com/cXpSc.jpg[/img_thumb] It's snowing again ugh... CC please[/QUOTE] Sort the white balance+exposure out/rule of thirds.
It's not white balance, it's under exposed. Cameras always under expose white stuff.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.