i accidentally entire panorama
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749634286/][img]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2530/5749634286_36da20bac1_b.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749634286/]makerpanorama[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/7451701@N07/]superfunkyjam[/url], on Flickr
Kinda upset with this one, cut off her hand and legs. People in the audience kept getting in the way, this was the best of like 20 shots :/
[img]http://img815.imageshack.us/img815/239/dsc2716.jpg[/img]
[img]http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/1884/dsc2752.jpg[/img]
[img]http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/3106/dsc2751.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=BuDSpOoNce;30000313]fantastic
[editline]23rd May 2011[/editline]
also i just ordered my canon 7d
i just ordered it so hard.
[URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/851/awyeeeaaah.jpg/][IMG]http://img851.imageshack.us/img851/5906/awyeeeaaah.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
:allears:
idk why i took a pic of that i guess i'm just excited[/QUOTE]
That's almost as much as my car :byodood:
Quick question: Are there any real downsides to vibration reduction (IS)? Should it be kept off when not needed, or does it not really make any difference other than perhaps a tiny hit to battery life? I know you're supposed to turn it off when using a tripod, but say I'm just walking around taking some well-lit shots at 1/250 and I've got a steady hand: should I turn it off?
photos for you!
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749843238/][img]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3071/5749843238_c6402ac05a_b.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749843238/]DSC_0220.jpg[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/7451701@N07/]superfunkyjam[/url], on Flickr
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749835704/][img]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2095/5749835704_1e0a45fb44_z.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749835704/]DSC_0201.jpg[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/7451701@N07/]superfunkyjam[/url], on Flickr
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749832708/][img]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2436/5749832708_665288c61d_z.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749832708/]DSC_0200.jpg[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/7451701@N07/]superfunkyjam[/url], on Flickr
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749776326/][img]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5066/5749776326_54c17d10c4_z.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749776326/]DSC_0068.jpg[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/7451701@N07/]superfunkyjam[/url], on Flickr
c&c much liked
[QUOTE=labbet;30001598]photos for you!
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749843238/][img]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3071/5749843238_c6402ac05a_b.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749843238/]DSC_0220.jpg[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/7451701@N07/]superfunkyjam[/url], on Flickr
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749835704/][img]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2095/5749835704_1e0a45fb44_z.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749835704/]DSC_0201.jpg[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/7451701@N07/]superfunkyjam[/url], on Flickr
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749832708/][img]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2436/5749832708_665288c61d_z.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749832708/]DSC_0200.jpg[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/7451701@N07/]superfunkyjam[/url], on Flickr
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749776326/][img]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5066/5749776326_54c17d10c4_z.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749776326/]DSC_0068.jpg[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/7451701@N07/]superfunkyjam[/url], on Flickr
c&c much liked[/QUOTE]
I like the first one, the other 3 are nothing special.
[QUOTE=Skyhawk;30001539]Quick question: Are there any real downsides to vibration reduction (IS)? Should it be kept off when not needed, or does it not really make any difference other than perhaps a tiny hit to battery life? I know you're supposed to turn it off when using a tripod, but say I'm just walking around taking some well-lit shots at 1/250 and I've got a steady hand: should I turn it off?[/QUOTE]
If you don't feel you need it, yes. For long telephoto lenses you'll probably want it on all of the time.
MardiGrass 2008:
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/edwinquast/5748254213/][img]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3113/5748254213_d857c8aa39_z.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/edwinquast/5748254213/]Untitled[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/edwinquast/]edwin.quast[/url], on Flickr
I don't know, what do you guys think about this one?
I like it... I think. With th fat hand and finger on the right and the guy on the left. I like how it's blocked by the person in the middle.
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/edwinquast/5748806244/][img]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5106/5748806244_53685f0e0f_z.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/edwinquast/5748806244/]Don't Point[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/edwinquast/]edwin.quast[/url], on Flickr
[QUOTE=Jaanus;29997152][img]http://www.jaanus.cc/pictures/2011-05-23_0121.png[/img][/QUOTE]
I don't want so sound like a dick, but why is EXIF important to some people? It's completely useless. I can see how it's cool to see the data for kicks, but you can't use it for anything.
EVERYTHING depends on the light, and light is never the same.
It's just because I've seen people going nuts because I wouldn't show them EXIF data for my pics, and I'm like "what the fuck are you gonna do with it?". It's useless really.
[IMG]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3422/5711091338_f19c449e39_z.jpg[/IMG]
What do you think about it?
Also, a cookie for whoever find out what is it and what the reflective surface is!
it's interesting to look at because I have no idea what it is.
I don't really like it, but I can't put my finger on why.
[QUOTE=Ferosso;30002856]I don't want so sound like a dick, but why is EXIF important to some people? It's completely useless. I can see how it's cool to see the data for kicks, but you can't use it for anything.
EVERYTHING depends on the light, and light is never the same.
It's just because I've seen people going nuts because I wouldn't show them EXIF data for my pics, and I'm like "what the fuck are you gonna do with it?". It's useless really.[/QUOTE]
Because I like to know what lens they used, or if it's a photo taken by my friend in a location near me I can clearly tell what the weather was, and what settings he used in order to help me better understand how the settings affect the photograph.
It's far from useless.
[QUOTE=Pitz;30003733][IMG]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3422/5711091338_f19c449e39_z.jpg[/IMG]
What do you think about it?
Also, a cookie for whoever find out what is it and what the reflective surface is![/QUOTE]
Gunna guess wax on a CD
I love looking at EXIF data.
jam on a transparent plate?
[QUOTE=ijyt;30004246]Because I like to know what lens they used, or if it's a photo taken by my friend in a location near me I can clearly tell what the weather was, and what settings he used in order to help me better understand how the settings affect the photograph.
It's far from useless.[/QUOTE]
I respect your opinion, and if you like checking out EXIF's, cool. But actually using EXIF for reference is pointless. First of all, it's like saying there's a right way to exposure a picture, and I better do it like that guy.
Second of all, again; lighting. It's the only thing that matters when taking a photo, and light is inconsistent as hell.
I disagree, It came in very handy when I started looking into star trail photography... seeing the ideal aperture, shutter and ISO combinations were very helpful.
[QUOTE=Ferosso;30005175]I respect your opinion, and if you like checking out EXIF's, cool. But actually using EXIF for reference is pointless. First of all, it's like saying there's a right way to exposure a picture, and I better do it like that guy.
Second of all, again; lighting. It's the only thing that matters when taking a photo, and light is inconsistent as hell.[/QUOTE]
Well seeing as from my experience it's worked very well, I'm going to return a general: no.
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749309775/][img]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3523/5749309775_49601299e9_z.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749309775/]DSC_0254.jpg[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/7451701@N07/]superfunkyjam[/url], on Flickr
I think it looks jaanus-y to me, what do you think?
[QUOTE=Ferosso;30005175]I respect your opinion, and if you like checking out EXIF's, cool. But actually using EXIF for reference is pointless. First of all, it's like saying there's a right way to exposure a picture, and I better do it like that guy.
Second of all, again; lighting. It's the only thing that matters when taking a photo, and light is inconsistent as hell.[/QUOTE]
I agree.
In my case, I had just forgot if bopie had an f/1.4 or f/1.8 lens. Thus the exif.
[QUOTE=labbet;30005827][url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749309775/][img]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3523/5749309775_49601299e9_z.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/7451701@N07/5749309775/]DSC_0254.jpg[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/7451701@N07/]superfunkyjam[/url], on Flickr
I think it looks jaanus-y to me, what do you think?[/QUOTE]
dat mixer
[editline]23rd May 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=BuDSpOoNce;30000313]fantastic
[editline]23rd May 2011[/editline]
also i just ordered my canon 7d
i just ordered it so hard.
[URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/851/awyeeeaaah.jpg/][IMG]http://img851.imageshack.us/img851/5906/awyeeeaaah.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
:allears:
idk why i took a pic of that i guess i'm just excited[/QUOTE]
awww yee
when u get it go take pics of it without the lens on
post them
~
Well, the right answer was blood on a hard disk plate! just for comparison-the dirty lines all over the picture is part of my fingerprint.
And another submission
[IMG]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5137/5534193209_cde63956a8_z.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Pitz;30007184]Well, the right answer was blood on a hard disk plate! just for comparison-the dirty lines all over the picture is part of my fingerprint.
And another submission
[IMG]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5137/5534193209_cde63956a8_z.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
It would be better if you straightened out the horizon a bit. It doesn't need to be perfectly level, but the way it is right now makes me feel as if the entire planet is falling over.
[QUOTE=Pitz;30007184]Well, the right answer was blood on a hard disk plate! just for comparison-the dirty lines all over the picture is part of my fingerprint.
And another submission
[IMG]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5137/5534193209_cde63956a8_z.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Straightened the horizon for you. :) Love the shot by the way. It's beautiful
[img]http://imageshack.us/m/850/4916/5534193209cde63956a8z2.jpg[/img]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/y2vnb.jpg[/IMG]
I'm beginning to love the forest.
[QUOTE=iWumbo;30009436]Straightened the horizon for you. :) Love the shot by the way. It's beautiful
[img]http://imageshack.us/m/850/4916/5534193209cde63956a8z2.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
That's not a problem, you just set it to wumbo!
But thanks for the feedback and the fix, it does look better that way!
I went on a long bike ride today with friends and went through an awesome forest at the end, but my friends couldn't be bothered to stop for me to take pictures :smith:
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
