• Coolest/Ugliest Weapons v7 - SHOTGUNS
    5,001 replies, posted
I will now retract back into my shell and lurk for several more months before feeling confident enough to post again in this thread
[QUOTE=DChapsfield;49734883]I will now retract back into my shell and lurk for several more months before feeling confident enough to post again in this thread[/QUOTE] Well, better to be curious and ask than to just either not know, or be confidently wrong.
[QUOTE=StrykerE;49734782][t]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CakCOO2WEAEBsbO.jpg:large[/t][t]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CakCOnrWcAAu_XK.jpg:large[/t][t]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CakCO8wXEAELehR.jpg:large[/t] [t]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CakCPU7WwAEeXzi.jpg:large[/t][t]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CawvnBVUMAAr92W.jpg:large[/t][t]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CawvncjUYAA3rBG.jpg:large[/t] Iraqi Black Market "Custom" guns[/QUOTE] Do you get those in a case or are they drops
wheres the knives
[QUOTE=zach1193;49730535]Take my money! seriously though, that's be awesome in .380 or something, how cool would it be if they made specialized .38spl rounds for it or something.[/QUOTE] Ya but in .38 you can just do delayed blowback so it makes having all that stuff irrelevant
Hey Bubba, whatcha got there? Oh god Bubba no, put it down [img]https://41.media.tumblr.com/48d0e7dd8a1a1869fbc5496e3dcb0abe/tumblr_ml1tai7Rup1s3vx9yo1_1280.jpg[/img] Bubba please [img]https://41.media.tumblr.com/54089eb8d1fefcb1b6148ba031b967c3/tumblr_ml1tai7Rup1s3vx9yo2_1280.jpg[/img] We can talk about this, just put the tools down, Bubba [img]https://40.media.tumblr.com/79530eac70277a4fc5d06cacb484e688/tumblr_ml1tai7Rup1s3vx9yo3_1280.jpg[/img] :scream:
[QUOTE=Sitkero;49735118]Hey Bubba, whatcha got there? Oh god Bubba no, put it down [img]https://41.media.tumblr.com/48d0e7dd8a1a1869fbc5496e3dcb0abe/tumblr_ml1tai7Rup1s3vx9yo1_1280.jpg[/img] :scream:[/QUOTE] i'm trying to piece together whats going on here.... there's no way thats functional.....right?
[QUOTE=Sableye;49735157]i'm trying to piece together whats going on here[/QUOTE] Probably one of those Enfield-based Aussie civilian guns in weirdass calibers because for a long time it was the only thing they had for civilians, far as I recall.
Speaking of which, have some modern Indian Lee-Enfields re-chambered in 8x50R Mannlicher [IMG]https://i.imgur.com/q1CdUSe.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Sitkero;49735118] [img]https://40.media.tumblr.com/79530eac70277a4fc5d06cacb484e688/tumblr_ml1tai7Rup1s3vx9yo3_1280.jpg[/img] [/QUOTE] Is that supposed to be a MG42??
[QUOTE=Hock;49735552]Is that supposed to be a MG42??[/QUOTE] MG3, halfway field-stripped and then the guys decided to have some fun, shoving random shit random places and taking a photo.
[QUOTE=Sitkero;49735118]Hey Bubba, whatcha got there? Oh god Bubba no, put it down [img]https://41.media.tumblr.com/48d0e7dd8a1a1869fbc5496e3dcb0abe/tumblr_ml1tai7Rup1s3vx9yo1_1280.jpg[/img] Bubba please :scream:[/QUOTE] mein eyes no-no, let me just post a picture of my rifle! [t]http://i.imgur.com/CItN8CV.jpg[/t] RVLE BRITANIA
It's hard to ruin an Enfield. They're kind of ugly to begin with. Plus, they made like a million of them. If it's not a rare variant then it's not really any big deal if someone modified it. On a different note, I went to a gunshow on Friday. In amongst the millions upon millions of identical o/u shotguns, I found this. [t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/9988278/IMG_0500.jpg[/t] [t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/9988278/IMG_0501.jpg[/t] I couldn't see any markings besides those you can see in the picture. It had that little spot of weld at the front of the reciever, so I was suspicious it might be a deact, but it's on a stall with nothing but actual firearms so I guess it's probably been modified to be straight-pull bolt action. Makes a change from the usual stuff you see over here. I also saw an M16A2 carbine but I was too busy drooling to take any photos.
[QUOTE=Riller;49735176]Probably one of those Enfield-based Aussie civilian guns in weirdass calibers because for a long time it was the only thing they had for civilians, far as I recall.[/QUOTE] its got a big bolt for what looks like either 9mm or .45 magazines
[QUOTE=SuicideZ;49734915]wheres the knives[/QUOTE] Right here [t]http://i.imgur.com/3NoEk2I.jpg[/t]
we csgo now boys
[QUOTE=residntevl;49736666]Right here [t]http://i.imgur.com/3NoEk2I.jpg[/t][/QUOTE] that poor bayonet disgusting
[QUOTE=residntevl;49736666]Right here [t]http://i.imgur.com/3NoEk2I.jpg[/t][/QUOTE] [I]feel the rainbow[/I]
[QUOTE=FloaterTWO;49735947]It's hard to ruin an Enfield. They're kind of ugly to begin with. Plus, they made like a million of them. If it's not a rare variant then it's not really any big deal if someone modified it. On a different note, I went to a gunshow on Friday. In amongst the millions upon millions of identical o/u shotguns, I found this. [t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/9988278/IMG_0500.jpg[/t] [t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/9988278/IMG_0501.jpg[/t] I couldn't see any markings besides those you can see in the picture. It had that little spot of weld at the front of the reciever, so I was suspicious it might be a deact, but it's on a stall with nothing but actual firearms so I guess it's probably been modified to be straight-pull bolt action. Makes a change from the usual stuff you see over here. I also saw an M16A2 carbine but I was too busy drooling to take any photos.[/QUOTE] Lee enfields aren't anything special from a distance but close up they are gorgeous rifles and they're so smooth, everything works together perfectly and it's a blast to shoot, I even got to do a bayonet charge on a target my mate had set up. They're hands down my favourite rifle ever.
Many people remember the Ontos solely for its unique armament of six 106mm recoilless rifles [img]https://41.media.tumblr.com/c2ef3ac9b9b30d115e1bf03b492e5261/tumblr_nsqsqj4TgY1tj31v2o1_1280.jpg[/img] [img]https://40.media.tumblr.com/9be8c84aa69f4f61b602fafe9079c5ca/tumblr_ntkg659B8r1tj31v2o1_1280.jpg[/img] What is frequently overlooked, however, is the vehicle's effective role as a battlefield mattress [img]https://41.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mb4qirVDSV1rcoy9ro1_1280.jpg[/img] :v:
I wanna get one of these guys. [img]http://cdn.net.outdoorhub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/01/outdoorhub-photos-trigger-time-new-dp-12-shotgun-2015-01-20_10-40-40.jpg[/img] They look like so much fun to play with.
[QUOTE=Cocacoladude;49738031]I wanna get one of these guys. [img]http://cdn.net.outdoorhub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/01/outdoorhub-photos-trigger-time-new-dp-12-shotgun-2015-01-20_10-40-40.jpg[/img] They look like so much fun to play with.[/QUOTE] [Img]http://www.geocities.ws/nghead/pics/weapons/superhand.jpg[/Img]? Are 90s video game weapons finally coming true? On an more realistic note, I doubt it's any bit practical and is quite heavy. But still, double barrel pump shotgun so who cares.
[QUOTE=FloaterTWO;49735947]It's hard to ruin an Enfield. They're kind of ugly to begin with.[/QUOTE] cunt, you take that back. [t]http://img08.deviantart.net/71b3/i/2013/113/b/7/british_no1_mk3_lee_enfield_by_plutonius-d62shva.jpg[/t]
[QUOTE=Araknid;49738280]cunt, you take that back. [t]http://img08.deviantart.net/71b3/i/2013/113/b/7/british_no1_mk3_lee_enfield_by_plutonius-d62shva.jpg[/t][/QUOTE] [img]https://facepunch.com/fp/flags/au.png[/img][img]https://facepunch.com/fp/flags/au.png[/img][img]https://facepunch.com/fp/flags/au.png[/img][img]https://facepunch.com/fp/flags/au.png[/img][img]https://facepunch.com/fp/flags/au.png[/img][img]https://facepunch.com/fp/flags/au.png[/img] (i know it's a british rifle but fuck you okay we used it and made it a couple times too) I really wanna get one of those rifles one day.
[QUOTE=FloaterTWO;49735947]It's hard to ruin an Enfield. They're kind of ugly to begin with. Plus, they made like a million of them. If it's not a rare variant then it's not really any big deal if someone modified it.[/QUOTE] While I agree with your second point, I have to say fuck you to the first. Enfields have so much beautiful detailing and tiny little things that make 'em so absolutely pretty. Take this one, just a random No1 Mk3 I found on a google search. [t]http://i.imgur.com/mLDnBXw.jpg[/t] First off, the buttplate and stock. Besides the pretty, reddish wood it's made in, it has this very nice, strangely British brass buttplate and whatever you call those little identification-disc-thingamabobs. [t]http://i.imgur.com/XHUUkef.jpg[/t] Then going up a little higher, we get to the grip, trigger and bolt area. Notice how the grip has a little 'heel' on it sticking out at the bottom, clearly and definitively defining where the grip ends and the stock begins. The trigger itself has a smooth, pleasing, constant ¿-shape to it. The bolt-handle is neither jutting out straight like a nugget or a sharp bend like a G98, instead being a smooth curve mounted at an angle, sleek and close to the receiver and laying beautifully over my personal favourite part of the visual design; the connecting piece of metal between buttstock and forearm of the rifle; adding a sense of aesthetic balance in the form of a border where the visual weight of the broad, curved buttstock meets the more sleek, elongated front. [t]http://i.imgur.com/Un84LZ8.jpg[/t] Going up a little more, we get the main part of the action; the rear-sight and the (for its time) very modern high-capacity magazine. This is probably my personal least favourite part of the rifle from a visual standpoint, mainly because it is so plain and generic-looking, and that wood-screw in the middle is an eyesore. The rear sight is a beauty, though; very robust and mechanical-looking as it juts out from the organic wood. [t]http://i.imgur.com/aL7JSVn.jpg[/t] And finally, what most people seem to like the most about the No. 3, the boomy-end. Broad-eared front-sight, jutting bayonet-lug, hidden muzzle behind a smooth, rounded, single piece of metal that smoothly curves around the stock, joining the hard, British industrialist steel with the more romantic-literature-reminiscent smooth, reddish brown wooden-stock that binds the entire thing together; obscuring the tiny visible stump of the barrel but with a small window to peek in on that vital part, as if to say "Yes, this is a rifle, not a piece of art". [t]http://i.imgur.com/XtsUwDi.png[/t] Of course, next to none of this was intended in the production of the rifle, it was simply the optimal way of making a stick shoot people dead back in its' day, but looking at it shows a weapon that is strangely characteristically British in its detailing, and very aesthetically pleasing at that.
Damn, must have been hell expensive to manufacture.
[QUOTE=PrusseLusken;49738705]Krag > Enfield[/QUOTE] Ain't trying to say Enfield is [I]the[/I] most beautiful rifle out there, just saying that claiming it's ugly or visually uninteresting is something I disagree strongly with, just like any one of you guys will probably disagree with me saying that the Springfield M1903 (Without any A-number, the original version) is boring and made entirely of straight lines. #realrifleshavecurves
[t]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/94/M1903-Springfield-Rifle.jpg[/t] For reals. It looks like a 11 year old drew a rifle. From the trigger guard to the buttplate, it's just one straight line.
Springfield lacks the soul the Enfield has.
[QUOTE=Riller;49738811][t]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/94/M1903-Springfield-Rifle.jpg[/t] For reals. It looks like a 11 year old drew a rifle. From the trigger guard to the buttplate, it's just one straight line.[/QUOTE] I like both Enfields and Springfields Fields of Glory
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.