• Guitar Discussion thread V5
    5,001 replies, posted
oh-la-la [img]http://www.dbzguitars.com/web/gallery/imperial-gal/images/imperial_black_4_jpg.jpg[/img] The DBZ Imperial Behold it and all it's thin glory. Anybody know the price? It doesn't say at the website.
[url]http://www.mrbluesguy.com/dbz-imperial-electric-guitar/[/url] 3998.00 $$$
[QUOTE=kman866;22358791][url]http://www.mrbluesguy.com/dbz-imperial-electric-guitar/[/url] 3998.00 $$$[/QUOTE] !! Well at least I can dream...
[QUOTE=JoeyZ;22352762]A bit more than 1/2", but thats only 'cause the body is chambered and it's a thick guitar. And if you really didn't want to do a lot of sanding, you can use your router to compensate by making a carve top the way a CNC machine would, it just takes more focus and you can screw up so easily. Edit: Kinda like this guy did here [URL]http://www.tdpri.com/forum/tele-home-depot/167965-diy-router-thicknesser.html[/URL][/QUOTE] That's the kind of thing I could do without a jig. Seems like a good method. Though, I wouldn't be able to do the curve all the way up to the top like that, I like to have a flat surface near the bridge and pickups.
[QUOTE=Siminov;22357433]But that Rickenbacker has a custom sound that none of those can fully replicate..[/QUOTE] If you like the tone of that Rickenbacker that much then yes, it's a problem. I, however, don't. I don't play anything that calls for a Rickenbacker guitar - plenty of songs played on Rickenbacker basses (Muse), but not their guitars.
Would I be a total twat if I bought the Buckethead gibson?
[QUOTE=kitteh-nator;22348335]That headstock is pure sex.[/QUOTE] You sure do like phallic objects, don't you?
[QUOTE=Hullu V3;22362579]Would I be a total twat if I bought the Buckethead gibson?[/QUOTE] It seems to me that with signature guitars, you pay for the name. Before you decide, look around for similar, cheaper options. Also, with Gibson, NEVER buy a guitar when you haven't played it first. And I mean it, don't pay for any guyitar that you haven't touched and seen.
^That man speaks the truth. Also, I know that it's a BC Rich. But I'd still want one just because of the shape. [img]http://img3.musiciansfriend.com/dbase/pics/products/8/1/2/547812.jpg[/img] [img]http://img3.musiciansfriend.com/dbase/pics/products/7/6/0/475760.jpg[/img] And I don't know why, but I'd want this one too. [img]http://img3.musiciansfriend.com/dbase/pics/products/1/2/5/537125.jpg[/img]
The 1st one it hideous
[QUOTE=nardix;22362887] [img]http://img3.musiciansfriend.com/dbase/pics/products/7/6/0/475760.jpg[/img] [/QUOTE] Well hot damn, looks like BC rich can make a guitar that looks nice
This bc rich is selling at a guitar shop near me. [IMG]http://www.valleymusic.com.au//components/com_virtuemart/shop_image/product/BC_Rich_Bitch_Do_4bb979f65ec95.jpg[/IMG]
I take it back
[QUOTE=mynames2long;22362687]It seems to me that with signature guitars, you pay for the name. Before you decide, look around for similar, cheaper options. Also, with Gibson, NEVER buy a guitar when you haven't played it first. And I mean it, don't pay for any guyitar that you haven't touched and seen.[/QUOTE] Nah, I wasn't going to pay 2000€ for a guitar anyways.
[QUOTE=SolidSnake52;22361563]If you like the tone of that Rickenbacker that much then yes, it's a problem. I, however, don't. I don't play anything that calls for a Rickenbacker guitar - plenty of songs played on Rickenbacker basses (Muse), but not their guitars.[/QUOTE] The only Rickenbacker I feel I want would be the Ricks with two necks, one guitar and one bass.
I'd want a 4003.. I love it's tone
[QUOTE=Camp er Joe;22363721]This bc rich is selling at a guitar shop near me. [IMG]http://www.valleymusic.com.au//components/com_virtuemart/shop_image/product/BC_Rich_Bitch_Do_4bb979f65ec95.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] Although I'm no BC Rich fan, I have to say there are three things about that guitar that I like. Firstly, I really like the finish. Secondly, the headstock shape, and Thirdly, I think the way they've done the twelve string one is pretty cool.
That's a good idea to have the octave strings tuned from the body.
Even though I'm not a fan of BC Rich, that tuning system is absolutely awesome.
It's not new. I personally think it looks a bit silly anyway :v:
[QUOTE=TheGuru;22367868]It's not new. I personally think it looks a bit silly anyway :v:[/QUOTE] Still way better than an enormous headstock on ordinary 12-strings
[img]http://www.unfretted.com/pages/gallery/more_images/vai_three_neck.jpg[/img] Shame it's an Ibby
[QUOTE=Dopey Trout;22369709][img]http://www.unfretted.com/pages/gallery/more_images/vai_three_neck.jpg[/img] Shame it's an Ibby[/QUOTE] Don't you go knocking Steve Fucking Vai's guitar. Steve Vai will kick your ass in more ways than you can imagine. Plus what's wrong with Ibanez?!
[QUOTE=SolidSnake52;22369773]Don't you go knocking Steve Fucking Vai's guitar. Steve Vai will kick your ass in more ways than you can imagine. Plus what's wrong with Ibanez?![/QUOTE] Their necks give me cramp And Steve Vai kinda bores me :v:
Ibanez seven string necks are godlike.
[QUOTE=TheGuru;22370107]Ibanez seven string necks are godlike.[/QUOTE] Too thin for my hands. If PRS made a 7 string I'd be in love, or if I could nab one of the new Suhr 7 strings
[QUOTE=Dopey Trout;22369968]Their necks give me cramp And Steve Vai kinda bores me :v:[/QUOTE] Steve Vai has written some of the most electic and exciting songs I have ever heard.
It's true that Ibanez guitars have thin necks.
[img]http://www.panopticist.com/graphics/pot_leaf_guitar.jpg[/img] heh
[QUOTE=AxisofIdiocy;22373050][IMG]http://www.panopticist.com/graphics/pot_leaf_guitar.jpg[/IMG] heh[/QUOTE] Taking stoner rock to a new dimension.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.