• Making Facepunch better - Don't post about ratings
    5,003 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Coolboy;48050942]Goddamnit, why can't I see the spinning feature, damn you, firefox.[/QUOTE] Gecko doesn't like keyframe transforms
[img]http://i.imgur.com/lEEe7it.png[/img] I win.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;48050943]I've lost track on what the fuck is going on.[/QUOTE] postal and robot will tear each other to pieces, taking the mod team with them. afterwards, we will take over facepunch or something. edit: or not.
[QUOTE=Scratch.;48050954]Gecko doesn't like keyframe transforms[/QUOTE] Firefox seems to be more like IE8 everyday, doing shit it's own way, all the time.
[QUOTE=Winner;48050972]it only spins when he's offline[/QUOTE] or when i want you to THINK i'm offline
[QUOTE=Scratch.;48050954]Gecko doesn't like keyframe transforms[/QUOTE] I can see what you're doing robot No it's not working -moz- requirement is dropped [editline]26th June 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=Scratch.;48050984]I can see what you're doing robot No it's not working -moz- requirement is dropped[/QUOTE] seems like a didn't trigger in the rule [code] .userinfo.user_8190 * { transform-origin: center; animation: postal 1s linear 0s infinite; }[/code] Just as good.
[QUOTE=Scratch.;48050984]I can see what you're doing robot No it's not working -moz- requirement is dropped[/QUOTE] Let's just agree that Firefox fucking sucks sometimes.
[QUOTE=Pr3dator;48050663]Yeah but the important stuff isn't there anymore so CLOSE ENOUGH[/QUOTE] I keep thinking your a mod due to the width of your avatar ;(
I present, the uninformed [QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;48051026]at least it doesn't eat ram like chrome [/QUOTE] [url]http://www.t3.com/news/google-plans-to-make-chrome-use-less-ram[/url]
Well when you've got [T]http://puu.sh/iCCs1/63520b4f31.png[/T] you tend to forget about that
[QUOTE=Scratch.;48051055]I present, the uninformed [url]http://www.t3.com/news/google-plans-to-make-chrome-use-less-ram[/url][/QUOTE] scratch, the know-it-all
[QUOTE=Limed00d;48051107]scratch, the know-it-all[/QUOTE] nah, just too much lurking of sh
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;48051086]the fact that facepunch with 0 addons still makes chrome eat 1.5GB of ram whilst firefox/waterfox sits at just under 1GB is yes some what an improvement from last month but its still bloated to fuck sure i got the ram for it to eat for days but for some that's a bit of a luxury besides this isn't helping facepunch getting better[/QUOTE] What the fuck you talking about? While browsing this page, the tab uses under 80MB of RAM, and Chrome uses under 180MB, with 9 Extensions and 1 background page running. [img]http://imgur.com/h919fY7.png[/img]
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;48051026]at least it doesn't eat ram like chrome :^)[/QUOTE] I never said Chrome is perfect, but at least it follows the web standards better.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;48051167]all browsers are different anyways lets get back to improving facepunch and not derail this[/QUOTE] Except they should strive to be the same ( in terms of web standards ). Anyway, Facepunch Improving Prank #3 is up, go find it
[QUOTE=Robotboy655;48051179]Except they should strive to be the same ( in terms of web standards ). Anyway, Facepunch Improving Prank #3 is up, go find it[/QUOTE] Uncentered icons under the profile pictures? If less than one row full.
[QUOTE=Robotboy655;48051179]Except they should strive to be the same ( in terms of web standards ). Anyway, Facepunch Improving Prank #3 is up, go find it[/QUOTE] Calling all craptaskets
-snip-
[QUOTE=Robotboy655;48051132]I never said Chrome is perfect, but at least it follows the web standards better.[/QUOTE] Would be painful if it didn't, so many browsers use WebKit (or descendants), not like web developing needs any more confusion added to it. [QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;48051167] anyways lets get back to improving facepunch and not derail this[/QUOTE] okay
[QUOTE=Cabbalistic;48051197]Uncentered icons under the profile pictures?[/QUOTE] They are clearly centered, though...
[QUOTE=gastyne;48051209]They are clearly centered, though...[/QUOTE] Look at the post above you.
postal 👌
What if the prank is that there is no prank?
[QUOTE=Cabbalistic;48051216]Look at the post above you.[/QUOTE] Oh now they aren't. They were when you posted. By the way, it looks worse.
[QUOTE=gastyne;48051224]Oh now they aren't. They were when you posted. By the way, it looks worse.[/QUOTE] Something about caching (I think.) It looks pretty off
[QUOTE=Robotboy655;48050960][img]http://i.imgur.com/lEEe7it.png[/img] I win.[/QUOTE] can we just move fp to a slack slack is clearly superior
[QUOTE=Robotboy655;48051022]Let's just agree that Firefox fucking sucks sometimes.[/QUOTE] Technically speaking it's Chrome breaking [URL="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14883250/css-transform-doesnt-work-on-inline-elements"]the spec[/URL]. If you set the display style of the animated [I]<a>[/I] tag to something transformable (e.g. [I]inline-block[/I]), it should start working on Firefox. (Thanks for removing the edit clutter btw, but it would still be nice to have it in a hover title or somewhere similar.)
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;48051086]the fact that facepunch with 0 addons still makes chrome eat 1.5GB of ram whilst firefox/waterfox sits at just under 1GB is yes some what an improvement from last month but its still bloated to fuck sure i got the ram for it to eat for days but for some that's a bit of a luxury besides this isn't helping facepunch getting better[/QUOTE] I've got [url=http://i.imgur.com/8SQi4km.png]so much garbage[/url] crammed into chrome and this is as bad as it gets
My laptop often just outright shuts off using chrome. That's why I switched to waterfox
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;48051986]Robotboy can we have a logout button right next to the username where the usercp and inbox icon is?[/QUOTE] Who said you can leave.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.