Making Facepunch better - Don't post about ratings
5,003 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Coolboy;48050942]Goddamnit, why can't I see the spinning feature, damn you, firefox.[/QUOTE]
Gecko doesn't like keyframe transforms
[img]http://i.imgur.com/lEEe7it.png[/img]
I win.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;48050943]I've lost track on what the fuck is going on.[/QUOTE]
postal and robot will tear each other to pieces, taking the mod team with them. afterwards, we will take over facepunch or something.
edit:
or not.
[QUOTE=Scratch.;48050954]Gecko doesn't like keyframe transforms[/QUOTE]
Firefox seems to be more like IE8 everyday, doing shit it's own way, all the time.
[QUOTE=Winner;48050972]it only spins when he's offline[/QUOTE]
or when i want you to THINK i'm offline
[QUOTE=Scratch.;48050954]Gecko doesn't like keyframe transforms[/QUOTE]
I can see what you're doing robot
No it's not working
-moz- requirement is dropped
[editline]26th June 2015[/editline]
[QUOTE=Scratch.;48050984]I can see what you're doing robot
No it's not working
-moz- requirement is dropped[/QUOTE]
seems like a didn't trigger in the rule
[code]
.userinfo.user_8190 * {
transform-origin: center;
animation: postal 1s linear 0s infinite;
}[/code]
Just as good.
[QUOTE=Scratch.;48050984]I can see what you're doing robot
No it's not working
-moz- requirement is dropped[/QUOTE]
Let's just agree that Firefox fucking sucks sometimes.
[QUOTE=Pr3dator;48050663]Yeah but the important stuff isn't there anymore so CLOSE ENOUGH[/QUOTE]
I keep thinking your a mod due to the width of your avatar ;(
I present, the uninformed
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;48051026]at least it doesn't eat ram like chrome
[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.t3.com/news/google-plans-to-make-chrome-use-less-ram[/url]
Well when you've got [T]http://puu.sh/iCCs1/63520b4f31.png[/T] you tend to forget about that
[QUOTE=Scratch.;48051055]I present, the uninformed
[url]http://www.t3.com/news/google-plans-to-make-chrome-use-less-ram[/url][/QUOTE]
scratch, the know-it-all
[QUOTE=Limed00d;48051107]scratch, the know-it-all[/QUOTE]
nah, just too much lurking of sh
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;48051086]the fact that facepunch with 0 addons still makes chrome eat 1.5GB of ram whilst firefox/waterfox sits at just under 1GB is yes some what an improvement from last month but its still bloated to fuck
sure i got the ram for it to eat for days but for some that's a bit of a luxury
besides this isn't helping facepunch getting better[/QUOTE]
What the fuck you talking about? While browsing this page, the tab uses under 80MB of RAM, and Chrome uses under 180MB, with 9 Extensions and 1 background page running.
[img]http://imgur.com/h919fY7.png[/img]
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;48051026]at least it doesn't eat ram like chrome
:^)[/QUOTE]
I never said Chrome is perfect, but at least it follows the web standards better.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;48051167]all browsers are different
anyways lets get back to improving facepunch and not derail this[/QUOTE]
Except they should strive to be the same ( in terms of web standards ).
Anyway, Facepunch Improving Prank #3 is up, go find it
[QUOTE=Robotboy655;48051179]Except they should strive to be the same ( in terms of web standards ).
Anyway, Facepunch Improving Prank #3 is up, go find it[/QUOTE]
Uncentered icons under the profile pictures?
If less than one row full.
[QUOTE=Robotboy655;48051179]Except they should strive to be the same ( in terms of web standards ).
Anyway, Facepunch Improving Prank #3 is up, go find it[/QUOTE]
Calling all craptaskets
-snip-
[QUOTE=Robotboy655;48051132]I never said Chrome is perfect, but at least it follows the web standards better.[/QUOTE]
Would be painful if it didn't, so many browsers use WebKit (or descendants), not like web developing needs any more confusion added to it.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;48051167]
anyways lets get back to improving facepunch and not derail this[/QUOTE]
okay
[QUOTE=Cabbalistic;48051197]Uncentered icons under the profile pictures?[/QUOTE]
They are clearly centered, though...
[QUOTE=gastyne;48051209]They are clearly centered, though...[/QUOTE]
Look at the post above you.
postal 👌
What if the prank is that there is no prank?
[QUOTE=Cabbalistic;48051216]Look at the post above you.[/QUOTE]
Oh now they aren't.
They were when you posted.
By the way, it looks worse.
[QUOTE=gastyne;48051224]Oh now they aren't.
They were when you posted.
By the way, it looks worse.[/QUOTE]
Something about caching (I think.)
It looks pretty off
[QUOTE=Robotboy655;48050960][img]http://i.imgur.com/lEEe7it.png[/img]
I win.[/QUOTE]
can we just move fp to a slack
slack is clearly superior
[QUOTE=Robotboy655;48051022]Let's just agree that Firefox fucking sucks sometimes.[/QUOTE]
Technically speaking it's Chrome breaking [URL="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14883250/css-transform-doesnt-work-on-inline-elements"]the spec[/URL].
If you set the display style of the animated [I]<a>[/I] tag to something transformable (e.g. [I]inline-block[/I]), it should start working on Firefox.
(Thanks for removing the edit clutter btw, but it would still be nice to have it in a hover title or somewhere similar.)
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;48051086]the fact that facepunch with 0 addons still makes chrome eat 1.5GB of ram whilst firefox/waterfox sits at just under 1GB is yes some what an improvement from last month but its still bloated to fuck
sure i got the ram for it to eat for days but for some that's a bit of a luxury
besides this isn't helping facepunch getting better[/QUOTE]
I've got [url=http://i.imgur.com/8SQi4km.png]so much garbage[/url] crammed into chrome and this is as bad as it gets
My laptop often just outright shuts off using chrome. That's why I switched to waterfox
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;48051986]Robotboy can we have a logout button right next to the username where the usercp and inbox icon is?[/QUOTE]
Who said you can leave.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.