[QUOTE=Bomimo;36259601]Only the working and middle class dislike her. That's only like 95% of Britain.
Let me see if i still remember the British social classes:
Lower - modern Slave. No ones property, but not their own. Suicidal. No teeth
Working - Trivial job, no life, no teeth, possibly depressed.
Middle - may own a house or rent one, trivial job, low income, has family and social life.
Upper-Middle - Owns their own place, still lives as a family, Non-trivial job or self-employed, good income, posh kids who act in Harry Potter. Otherwise known as Politician Class. If the fortune is inherited there's a high chance that they have no idea about how life works and is clueless about society in general.
Upper - Rich as all fuck, Possibly Titled. In case of title, crooked as fuck teeth and inbred through 15 generations or just fucked a prince of wales and got the title in a divorce settlement... or fucked the young princess in the 50s.[/QUOTE]
It's generally considered that there are three main groups: working, middle and upper. The divides are sort of blurring now though (although the conservatives tend to help the rich get richer). But regardless of class, thatcher was a witch.
[URL]http://www.isthatcherdeadyet.co.uk/[/URL]
i hate categorising people.
i dont know who margret thatcher is
must be one of those britishy old wimen that drink 50 cups of tea a day
[QUOTE=Rusty100;36259729]i dont know who margret thatcher is[/QUOTE]
You're lucky.
[QUOTE=jaykray;36259657]It's generally considered that there are three main groups: working, middle and upper. The divides are sort of blurring now though (although the conservatives tend to help the rich get richer). But regardless of class, thatcher was a witch.
[URL]http://www.isthatcherdeadyet.co.uk/[/URL][/QUOTE]
I think i went too far back for those. That was the classes during the industrialization and right after. They're still relevant though.
[editline]9th June 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=AK'z;36259666]i hate categorising people.[/QUOTE]
You do it all of the time. Every time you call someone a sandnigger, faggot, retard, bitch or whatever. You also do it constantly in a non-negative context in your everyday. By job, hobby, football team, politic views and so on. Nothing wrong with it in itself.
[editline]9th June 2012[/editline]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2f8nYMCO2I[/media]
thatcher ruined the lives of so many members of my family and friend's families. Fuck Thatcher, I'd sucker punch that bitch if I saw her
[QUOTE=Bomimo;36259867]
You do it all of the time. Every time you call someone a sandnigger, faggot, retard, bitch or whatever. [/QUOTE]
whoa, what the fuck dude calm down
[QUOTE=strayebyrd;36260169]thatcher ruined the lives of so many members of my family and friend's families. Fuck Thatcher, I'd sucker punch that bitch if I saw her[/QUOTE]
She has Alzheimer's now, so I think sucker punching 'that bitch' is kinda out of the question
[QUOTE=Bomimo;36259867]Every time you call someone a sandnigger, faggot, retard, bitch or whatever.[/QUOTE]
ok
Ghostwatch (it's kind of a movie) 10/10.
Goddamn, this shit must have been goddamn terrifying to watch as it originally aired.
[QUOTE=Stockers678;36260776]She has Alzheimer's now, so I think sucker punching 'that bitch' is kinda out of the question[/QUOTE]
I'll take anyone on, it would be better now because she'd forget and I'd be able to do it again
[QUOTE=strayebyrd;36260860]I'll take anyone on, it would be better now because she'd forget and I'd be able to do it again[/QUOTE]
You're abosultely off the rails insane. You want to physically harm a person who might not even remember what she might have done to you? and even if she did remember, didn't think she harmed anyone worth not harming?
[QUOTE=Bomimo;36260912]You're abosultely off the rails insane. You want to physically harm a person who might not even remember what she might have done to you? and even if she did remember, didn't think she harmed anyone worth not harming?[/QUOTE]
That's quite an ethical dilemma. Is the harm she caused any less because she can't remember she did it? Is she still culpable?
[QUOTE=Bomimo;36260912]You're abosultely off the rails insane. You want to physically harm a person who might not even remember what she might have done to you? and even if she did remember, didn't think she harmed anyone worth not harming?[/QUOTE]
1. It was a joke chill your underoos
2. I think if a war criminal had alzheimers I would want them tried even if they didn't remember it, I consider what Thatcher did worthy of some sort of inquest or trial
[B]Prometheus[/B] - 6/10...
Seriously disappointing, especially in the story front.
Felt like it was edited in a hurry and most of the acting was really quite bad save for Fassbender.
Made me jump a few times and it was pretty to look at though.
the blind swordsman: zatoichi 2/5
:< worst Kitano movie I've seen, plot was so uninteresting, no energy to anything. at least there were some totally weird funny moments that reminded me of some other Kitano films like Sonatine.
[QUOTE=jaykray;36260993]That's quite an ethical dilemma. Is the harm she caused any less because she can't remember she did it? Is she still culpable?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=strayebyrd;36261044]
2. I think if a war criminal had alzheimers I would want them tried even if they didn't remember it, I consider what Thatcher did worthy of some sort of inquest or trial[/QUOTE]
Don't vote her in. Unlike Hitler, she didn't get deposed by outside parties and wasn't needed to. Every policy she passed was thanks to a majority in votes. I know most people these days haven't a clue how to vote responsibly, the past ten years of conflicts and protests thereof show that clearly, but back then? really?
[QUOTE=Bomimo;36261397]Don't vote her in. Unlike Hitler, she didn't get deposed by outside parties and wasn't needed to. Every policy she passed was thanks to a majority in votes. I know most people these days haven't a clue how to vote responsibly, the past ten years of conflicts and protests thereof show that clearly, but back then? really?[/QUOTE]
It was the 80s, people with money started getting cunty and selfish and she convinced them that they could live great if they shit on the lower classes. None of my family ever voted for her, and the policies are passed more by parliament than public vote
The Innkeepers 6/10
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/72/The_Innkeepers_Poster.jpg/220px-The_Innkeepers_Poster.jpg[/img]
While the movie was overall enjoyable, I felt the story had no depth to it. The characters were given little to no backstory, so the viewer was left with no attachment, and when the story finally starts to pick up, it abruptly ends with no explanation as to what or why.
Dream House 7/10
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fb/Dream_House_Poster.jpg/215px-Dream_House_Poster.jpg[/img]
I'm not really sure what to say about this one. Halfway through, you would think it was written by M. Night Shyamalan, and despite being pretty predictable, wasn't a half bad movie. More of a watch once, and enjoy, but very unlike to watch again kind of movie.
[QUOTE=strayebyrd;36261431]It was the 80s, people with money started getting cunty and selfish and she convinced them that they could live great if they shit on the lower classes. None of my family ever voted for her, and the policies are passed more by parliament than public vote[/QUOTE]
That's Representative Democracy for ya. It's fucking shit, the bigger the represented populace gets.
Indiana jones: the temple of doom 8/10
imo its the best indiana movie (or aleast the most intressting one).
[QUOTE=vagrant;36261148]the blind swordsman: zatoichi 2/5
:< worst Kitano movie I've seen, plot was so uninteresting, no energy to anything. at least there were some totally weird funny moments that reminded me of some other Kitano films like Sonatine.[/QUOTE]
that's the one where he's super old and it turns out he isn't blind right? yeah, that one sucked. mind you, there are about 28 zatoichi films, but that one is probably the worst of them.
the prisoner in the closet in Sanjuro is hilarious
project X
An orthodox jew persuades his loser friends into hosting a dope ass party, filmed by an autistic kid
6/10 - stupid as fuck but it was awesome
[QUOTE=The_Marine;36261119][B]Prometheus[/B] - 6/10...
Seriously disappointing, especially in the story front.
Felt like it was edited in a hurry and most of the acting was really quite bad save for Fassbender.
Made me jump a few times and it was pretty to look at though.[/QUOTE]
Wouldn't call the acting bad. The script was pretty mediocre.
I Saw the Devil - 8/10
saw Melancholia.
probably the most soothing of the Lars movies.
There's a running theme through pretty much all his movies I have noticed. Well I've seen about 5 of them now, and they've all been roughly about female depression.
It's not ridiculously intense or ridiculously depressing. It just feels serene, and it's a quality I like about this, unlike many of his other movies.
[QUOTE=AK'z;36264278]saw Melancholia.
probably the most soothing of the Lars movies.
There's a running theme through pretty much all his movies I have noticed. Well I've seen about 5 of them now, and they've all been roughly about female depression.
It's not ridiculously intense or ridiculously depressing. It just feels serene, and it's a quality I like about this, unlike many of his other movies.[/QUOTE]
Quite often the point of his films is the power shift between two characters. Melancholia is about how the strong become weak when theres something to lose and how the weak become strong because they don't give a shit. Antichrist had a similar theme. I thought Melancholia was a far superior film to Antichrist. Big fan of his stuff.
yeah, I really liked Breaking the Waves and Dancer in the Dark. But damn those are ridiculously depressive.
Will definitely see a few more of his though.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
