DEBATE: Should women be able to join the military?
167 replies, posted
Women are too emotional, and don't have enough bron. I think they could work in the medical field, however they would have difficulties lifting bodies. Also, due to them never knowing what they actually want, 80% of the ones who join will change their mind about 30 minutes afterwards. Not to mention all the ditsy girls who would be worried about frivolous things, such as hair, fingernails, and makeup.
There is also the fact that they will now need to have separate changing rooms, sleeping rooms, showering rooms, and also separate standards, and female trainers. This would cost too much money, and it's not even worth it, considering how many woman would actually join.
lol that's funny
[QUOTE=OutOfPop;18902851]Women are too emotional, and don't have enough bron. I think they could work in the medical field, however they would have difficulties lifting bodies. Also, due to them never knowing what they actually want, 80% of the ones who join will change their mind about 30 minutes afterwards. Not to mention all the ditsy girls who would be worried about frivolous things, such as hair, fingernails, and makeup.
There is also the fact that they will now need to have separate changing rooms, sleeping rooms, showering rooms, and also separate standards, and female trainers. This would cost too much money, and it's not even worth it, considering how many woman would actually join.[/QUOTE]
Those are American women.
See Russian women :Dawkins102:...
[QUOTE=thisispain;18902922]Those are American women.
See Russian women :Dawkins102:...[/QUOTE]
How so? I know plenty of Russian women and American women, myself being a Russian man, I don't see any such differences between the two that would relate to the implication you are making good sir. Though I do see where one would go with the made point.
I don't care about metabolism, judaism or less muscle mass
[IMG]http://www.cubeupload.com/files/51b600frogouthuge.gif[/IMG]
[QUOTE=lum1naire;18903749]I don't care about metabolism, judaism or less muscle mass
[IMG]http://www.cubeupload.com/files/51b600frogouthuge.gif[/IMG][/QUOTE]
using the giant get out sign with the frog are we
not my watch
[QUOTE=thisispain;18903783]using the giant get out sign with the frog are we
not my watch[/QUOTE]
By quoting it you just promoted the image, thereby ruining your credibility in your so called "crusade" against the giant frog image.
bein a smartasse are we
not my watch
[QUOTE=thisispain;18903783]using the giant get out sign with the frog are we
not my watch[/QUOTE]
on the loose, always drinkin juice, quieter than goose
catch me if you can mr. moose
[editline]05:24AM[/editline]
not my watch what is this this isnt english is it
took you long enough
[QUOTE=thisispain;18903822]bein a smartasse are we
not my watch[/QUOTE]
Whatcha gonna do about it...punk?
Yes.
[QUOTE=OutOfPop;18902851]Women are too emotional, and don't have enough bron. I think they could work in the medical field, however they would have difficulties lifting bodies. Also, due to them never knowing what they actually want, 80% of the ones who join will change their mind about 30 minutes afterwards. Not to mention all the ditsy girls who would be worried about frivolous things, such as hair, fingernails, and makeup.
There is also the fact that they will now need to have separate changing rooms, sleeping rooms, showering rooms, and also separate standards, and female trainers. This would cost too much money, and it's not even worth it, considering how many woman would actually join.[/QUOTE]
You seem to be confusing women with people who are not suited for a career in a military
[editline]12:43AM[/editline]
Women have been serving in combat for decades now without problem
Military should be exempt from being 'politically correct.'
Women, on average, are not physically fit or capable as men. That's just plain science there. Naturally they will not be doing the same things as men simply because they are not as effective. This IS life and death here, soldiers are trained to kill, and to kill effectively.
I'm not going to say that they should or shouldn't, I'm just going to say that the most effective decision will be the chosen one. They won't sacrifice effectiveness for equality... just so women can have a fair chance at becoming killing machines as men. Mixed genders might cause a huge amount of disturbances and not worth the risk, so naturally the least effective gender will be excluded.
Sorry girls, there's always going to be an abundance of men around to haul heavy crates, go 72 hours without proper sleep without bitching or hormonal outbursts , and to drag fallen comrades through the mud.. Keep up if you can, if not, then get the fuck back into the kitchen.
[QUOTE=TH3_L33T;18901774]I know they can! But do you think they should be able to?[/QUOTE]
you wouldn't ask that if you didn't want them in the military.
They already are, and look at how we use them.
[img]http://miami.media.indypgh.org/uploads/2006/01/army_girls_gone_wild6_347.jpg[/img]
Morale has never been higher.
[QUOTE=MovingSalad;18904409]Military should be exempt from being 'politically correct.'
Women, on average, are not physically fit or capable as men. That's just plain science there. Naturally they will not be doing the same things as men simply because they are not as effective. This IS life and death here, soldiers are trained to kill, and to kill effectively.
I'm not going to say that they should or shouldn't, I'm just going to say that the most effective decision will be the chosen one. They won't sacrifice effectiveness for equality... just so women can have a fair chance at becoming killing machines as men. Mixed genders might cause a huge amount of disturbances and not worth the risk, so naturally the least effective gender will be excluded.
Sorry girls, there's always going to be an abundance of men around to haul heavy crates, go 72 hours without proper sleep without bitching or hormonal outbursts , and to drag fallen comrades through the mud.. Keep up if you can, if not, then get the fuck back into the kitchen.[/QUOTE]
oh my god you are so edgy how can you go on being so politically incorrect
[QUOTE=thisispain;18904572]oh my god you are so edgy how can you go on being so politically incorrect[/QUOTE]
oh dang, lets bang
Everyone knows the only women that join the Army are the ones with pink hair and buzz-cuts!
Women actually make better Snipers on average due to their body type.
[QUOTE=johngrimm;18904654]Women actually make better Snipers on average due to their body type.[/QUOTE]
Except women, on average, are unable to hold a gun the size of their torso up to their fucking eye in order to shoot it.
[img]http://www.enemyforces.net/firearms/m82a1.jpg[/img]
I want to see what women you're talking about, because most of the ones around here wouldn't know which end of the gun the bullet came out of.
[QUOTE=MovingSalad;18904697]
I want to see what women you're talking about[/QUOTE]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyudmila_Pavlichenko[/url]
inbefore she has balls
[QUOTE=thisispain;18904803][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyudmila_Pavlichenko[/url][/QUOTE]
Bitch has balls.
[QUOTE=MovingSalad;18904697]Except women, on average, are unable to hold a gun the size of their torso up to their fucking eye in order to shoot it.
[img]http://www.enemyforces.net/firearms/m82a1.jpg[/img]
I want to see what women you're talking about, because most of the ones around here wouldn't know which end of the gun the bullet came out of.[/QUOTE]
Even if the majority of women cant, you should let the small amount of women that can to join the military if they want.
[QUOTE=ScoutKing;18901817]I don't remember seeing this in any PF,LD or CX?
what section is this from in the national league?[/QUOTE]
PF isn't real debate.
I don't feeling like explaining it, but women shouldn't be allowed in a tight group or be sent on missions where she could be captured.
They already can. And I believe it should stay that way because we live in 2009, passing onto 2010! There is a black man in the white-house for god's sake. (No that wasn't meant to be racist, it was a point.)
[editline]10:50PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=MovingSalad;18904697]Except women, on average, are unable to hold a gun the size of their torso up to their fucking eye in order to shoot it.
[media]http://www.enemyforces.net/firearms/m82a1.jpg[/media]
I want to see what women you're talking about, because most of the ones around here wouldn't know which end of the gun the bullet came out of.[/QUOTE]
If they are unable to fulfill their duties they could become a computer engineer or mechanic at a base. Women are great pilots you know.
[QUOTE=bnet;18905371]PF isn't real debate.[/QUOTE]
good point.
I think they should, but there's probably a higher chance of them getting raped or something
Um, what country are we talking about? I thought women can already join the military.
[editline]11:10PM[/editline]
In most countries anyway.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.