You're going to hell, your evolution is getting you there
[QUOTE=Doriol;17126806]yes, but there was no "you" at that point[/QUOTE]
Uh no.
You were thinking, you were developing, thus, you were there.
But can't remember anything due to your brain not develope enough to store memory.
[QUOTE=Lankist;17126803]Uhh, that's only like a dozen words.
That proves nothing. There is no context.[/QUOTE]
The site is set up so that you can read in either direction. You're more than capable of getting the context yourself. [url=http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+10&version=KJ21]It's not hard.[/url]
[QUOTE=Lankist;17126815]That doesn't mean they are wrong, that means they can be wrong.
They are NOT wrong until proven as such.[/QUOTE]
I'm not saying they are wrong, I'm saying they just aren't proven. As in 100% factually concurant.
[QUOTE=KestasLT;17126840]Uh no.
You were thinking, you were developing, thus, you were there.
But can't remember anything due to your brain not develope enough to store memory.[/QUOTE]
a fetus has no concept of thought
[quote]I'm not saying they are wrong, I'm saying they just aren't proven. As in 100% factually concurant. [/quote]
well no shit, there's no such thing as absolute knowledge
[QUOTE=gunvalk;17126802][b]scientific theory (a theory that explains scientific observations) "scientific theories must be falsifiable"[/b]
Pulled this shit from the dictionary. Scientific theories are left as such because although formed through testing via the Scientific Method, are still falsifiable.[/QUOTE]
Well no fucking duh. Laws are constant acting forces. Theories are explanations, and are therefor not simply constant numbers. Of course they're falsifiable.
They're also the closest thing to fact in their class. Do you want us to lie to you and make up a new class of explanation that isn't falsifiable so we can stop your retarded bitching?
[QUOTE=Zeke129;17126842]The site is set up so that you can read in either direction. You're more than capable of getting the context yourself.[/QUOTE]
Of King James
[QUOTE=KestasLT;17126548]There has to be something after death, darkness, nah.
I would just go insane, and probably die again.
Since everything has a beggining, and nobody knows what the end looks like.[/QUOTE]
Restart :D.
You guys might as well stop arguing. Lankist refuses to shut the fuck up until you give up out of boredom of frustration, regardless of how wrong he obviously is.
Seriously, you'll be here until morning.
Oh hey, Doriol dropped by too. Wonderful.
[QUOTE=Wangman;17126870]You guys might as well stop arguing. Lankist refuses to shut the fuck up until you give up out of boredom of frustration, regardless of how wrong he obviously is.
Seriously, you'll be here until morning.
Oh hey, Doriol dropped by too. Wonderful.[/QUOTE]
Oh hey welcome to the thread nobody cares what you think.
[QUOTE=gunvalk;17126848]I'm not saying they are wrong, I'm saying they just aren't proven. As in 100% factually concurant.[/QUOTE]
They couldn't be you thick fool, they're too complicated to be infallible. [B]Nothing[/B] in science outside of math is constant.
[QUOTE=Wangman;17126870]You guys might as well stop arguing. Lankist refuses to shut the fuck up until you give up out of boredom of frustration, regardless of how wrong he obviously is.
Seriously, you'll be here until morning.
Oh hey, Doriol dropped by too. Wonderful.[/QUOTE]
too bad we're both right
mr. mcguffin as well
and billiam
[img]http://www.facepunch.com/image.php?u=193143&dateline=1251060777[/img]:hf:[img]http://www.facepunch.com/image.php?u=200285&dateline=1234431238[/img]:hf:[img]http://www.facepunch.com/image.php?u=68624&dateline=1250831816[/img]:hf:[img]http://www.facepunch.com/image.php?u=161554&dateline=1249149544[/img]
many of the concepts we have about god are probably wrong, there is no reason that all religion must say that god is infallible. What I'm trying to say is I believe in some higher being but base my belief on what seems the most correct from several cultures. I combine that into a belief that's mine and not some fat gizzard in rome. No disrespect.
[QUOTE=Mr. Mcguffin;17126860]Well no fucking duh. Laws are constant acting forces. Theories are explanations, and are therefor not simply constant numbers. Of course they're falsifiable.
They're also the closest thing to fact in their class. Do you want us to lie to you and make up a new class of explanation that isn't falsifiable so we can stop your retarded bitching?[/QUOTE]
I'm not bitching, I have no problem with Evolution. I'm not even saying its wrong or right. I'm 100% unbiased. I'm simply stating That I myself have not seen enough evidence to lean in that direction.
[QUOTE=Lankist;17126867]Of King James[/QUOTE]
I'm sorry, I can't seem to find the original version of the bible. My resources also don't include a time machine so I can go back and ask the authors myself.
The fact is, religion only exists in the minds of those who believe it. I'm willing to bet that most Christians believe that Lucifer = Satan, so that pretty much makes it so. We're not talking about an actual historical event here.
[QUOTE=Doriol;17126858]a fetus has no concept of thought
well no shit, there's no such thing as absolute knowledge[/QUOTE]
It doesen't, have thought, but its conscuos (i can't remember how to spell it)
Also, i won't be able to argue, watching a movie, so bye
And remember, you will die someday - happy thoughts.
Why can't science and religion coexist >.<!
[QUOTE=Wangman;17126870]You guys might as well stop arguing. Lankist refuses to shut the fuck up until you give up out of boredom of frustration, regardless of how wrong he obviously is.
Seriously, you'll be here until morning.
Oh hey, Doriol dropped by too. Wonderful.[/QUOTE]
The people of this forum are confident in their logic, also when is Lankist "obviously" wrong?
Your late sir south park proved this a long time ago.
I fucking hate liberals. They spread their filth and lies and amoral practices everywhere.
The only thing that makes them diffrent from other human trash is that they refuse to shut the fuck up.
[QUOTE=Wangman;17126870]You guys might as well stop arguing. Lankist refuses to shut the fuck up until you give up out of boredom of frustration, regardless of how wrong he obviously is.
Seriously, you'll be here until morning.
Oh hey, Doriol dropped by too. Wonderful.[/QUOTE]
You're just mad that you didn't get in on this earlier.
[editline]05:12PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Wangman;17126939]I fucking hate liberals. They spread their filth and lies and amoral practices everywhere.
The only thing that makes them diffrent from other human trash is that they refuse to shut the fuck up.[/QUOTE]
You're just mad
[QUOTE=Zenreon117;17126918]Why can't science and religion coexist >.<![/QUOTE]
The text in most mainstream religions don't make room for coexistence.
[QUOTE=gunvalk;17126901]I'm not bitching, I have no problem with Evolution. I'm not even saying its wrong or right. I'm 100% unbiased. I'm simply stating That I myself have not seen enough evidence to lean in that direction.[/QUOTE]
That's because you haven't bothered looking. If you actually gave a shit about knowledge you'd have taken at least a fucking basic class on it before even making a comment. I don't comment on 12th century China because I don't have any fucking clue what 12th century China was like.
This is not that complicated.
[QUOTE=KestasLT;17126916]It doesen't, have thought, but its conscuos (i can't remember how to spell it)
Also, i won't be able to argue, watching a movie, so bye
And remember, you will die someday - happy thoughts.[/QUOTE]
conscience - with knowledge
a fetus has no consciousness
[QUOTE=Zeke129;17126915]I'm sorry, I can't seem to find the original version of the bible. My resources also don't include a time machine so I can go back and ask the authors myself.
The fact is, religion only exists in the minds of those who believe it. I'm willing to bet that most Christians believe that Lucifer = Satan, so that pretty much makes it so. We're not talking about an actual historical event here.[/QUOTE]
Except there is no consistent link and the three have entirely different roles in their respective stories.
[QUOTE=Billiam;17126926]The people of this forum are confident in their logic, also when is Lankist "obviously" wrong?[/QUOTE]
Don't be a brown noser, there's already plenty of them around here.
[QUOTE=Zenreon117;17126918]Why can't science and religion coexist >.<![/QUOTE]
Science is the concerted human effort to understand, or to understand better, the history of the natural world and how the natural world works, with [b]observable physical evidence[/b] as the basis of that understanding. Sadly this is why.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;17126943]You're just mad that you didn't get in on this earlier.
[editline]05:12PM[/editline]
You're just mad[/QUOTE]
Yea, that's why I posted that I hate them.
:herp:
ON AN UNRELATED NOTE: It appears we've entered some bizarre Dimension where Rainbows rule the world
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
