Facepunch Avatar Rules Are Too Lenient (and it's being dealt with- page 4) - General

[QUOTE=Daemon White;45362553]She's not getting fucked in that particular cropped image though. - [sp]It's Ellie holding her shirt up with her mouth, revealing her breasts. She's sitting in a way that doesn't show a vagina, but she is bottomless.[/sp][/QUOTE] You probably shouldn't have linked to it since it's loli...

[QUOTE=Karl L;45362626]So does my avatar fall under one of these naughty categories?[/QUOTE] Why would it? It's not suggestive, or nude, or something else. Just because it's a woman doesn't make it questionable or all that stupid shit.

crypto's (IMO) guide to "is my avatar ok" could you see the original uncropped content in a network television show? if so, then your avatar is safe example: Karl L's avatar, ehh, it's feasible, bikinis aren't that bad counter example: Dub!'s cropped drawn child pornography, nah, that's not really kosher

[QUOTE=isnipeu;45362675]You probably shouldn't have linked to it since it's loli...[/QUOTE] Alright, I'll snip just in case.

[QUOTE=Dub!;45362565]Because I like the character and I think the picture is cute[/QUOTE] Maybe, just maybe you could have an avatar that isn't obviously cropped porn? I don't understand why you have an avatar of porn other then saying "Look at me I masturbate to this". You've just fishing for reactions.

all I see is a bunch of children getting upset. this is the same thing as going into a css server and flipping out over a porn spray lol

[QUOTE=ragin cajun;45362755]Maybe, just maybe you could have an avatar that isn't obviously cropped porn? I don't understand why you have an avatar of porn other then saying "Look at me I masturbate to this". You've just fishing for reactions.[/QUOTE] Then I'll change it? [B]EDIT:[/B] There.

[QUOTE=Nightfury;45362724]Why would it? It's not suggestive, or nude, or something else. Just because it's a woman doesn't make it questionable or all that stupid shit.[/QUOTE] If it were an anime women, it'd be unacceptable. [editline]11th July 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Cone;45361825][IMG]http://facepunch.com/image.php?u=138043&dateline=1381108405[/IMG][/QUOTE] Some of those are fine.

[QUOTE=KillerJaguar;45362760] Some of those are fine.[/QUOTE] But some of them aren't. One visibly shows an underage girl pulling her panties down.

Rest in peace, muscle growth lucario.

[QUOTE=Dub!;45362775]But some of them aren't. One visibly shows an underage girl pulling her panties down.[/QUOTE] That's why I didn't say all of them were.

[QUOTE=KillerJaguar;45362782]That's why I didn't say all of them were.[/QUOTE] So by the new rules he'd be banned for having loli material in his avatar until he removes the NSFW clips in the gif

[img]http://filesmelt.com/dl/avatarv2.jpg[/img] Here's something new for you if you want it. [url=http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2014/157/a/b/she_was_lookin__kind_of_dumb_by_freakorama1-d7l83dr.png]Taken from this (SFW)[/url] Edit: Oh, you already changed it. Well, offer's still there.

Since I assume deer drool may be considered some kind of body fluid, I decided to just crop a part of my old avatar: [url]http://i.minus.com/iblV0AGdTpxCyv.png[/url] No mysterious fluids, no movement and I didn't even have to edit out the tip of a dick this time. Is this heavily cropped image appropriate?

[QUOTE=Dub!;45362794]So by the new rules he'd be banned for having loli material in his avatar until he removes the NSFW clips in the gif[/QUOTE] An aside, I've been dumbed before for saying people who like 14-17 year olds are pedophiles, but it's okay to label 14-17 year old anime characters as lolicon. Double standard much?

[QUOTE=DrasarSalman;45362798]Since I assume deer drool may be considered some kind of body fluid, I decided to just crop a part of my old avatar: [url]http://i.minus.com/iblV0AGdTpxCyv.png[/url] No mysterious fluids, no movement and I didn't even have to edit out the tip of a dick this time. Is this heavily cropped image appropriate?[/QUOTE] imo if we know it's cropped porn then it shouldn't be your avatar thats the same fucking thing from your old avatar

[QUOTE=Daemon White;45362795][img]http://filesmelt.com/dl/avatarv2.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] I already had that picture as my avatar but being a blue member kinda fucks that over. Doesn't fit in 64x64. I guess I'll use this one seeing as you've made it better. Thanks m8. EDIT: Yeah, the avatar doesn't work. Blue avatars are 64x64.

[QUOTE=LordCrypto;45362731]crypto's (IMO) guide to "is my avatar ok" could you see the original uncropped content in a network television show? if so, then your avatar is safe [/QUOTE] Well in that case my avatar would be considered lewd, which is pretty asinine

[QUOTE=LordCrypto;45362731]crypto's (IMO) guide to "is my avatar ok" could you see the original uncropped content in a network television show? if so, then your avatar is safe example: Karl L's avatar, ehh, it's feasible, bikinis aren't that bad counter example: Dub!'s cropped drawn child pornography, nah, that's not really kosher[/QUOTE] Thank god I'm safe

[QUOTE=Dub!;45362829]I already had that picture as my avatar but being a blue member kinda fucks that over. Doesn't fit in 64x64. I guess I'll use this one seeing as you've made it better. Thanks m8. EDIT: Yeah, the avatar doesn't work. Blue avatars are 64x64.[/QUOTE] Oh, it was 64x64. Wait, when I was blue, I thought it was allowed to be 80x80. I could shrink it if you still want it.

[QUOTE=Daemon White;45362859]Wait, when I was blue, I thought it was allowed to be 80x80. I could shrink it if you still want it.[/QUOTE] I got it.

So is mine okay? I don't care if I have to change it.

[QUOTE=Durrsly;45362874]So is mine okay? I don't care if I have to change it.[/QUOTE] If you don't mind, change it

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;45362821]imo if we know it's cropped porn then it shouldn't be your avatar thats the same fucking thing from your old avatar[/QUOTE] While generally yeah that could be sound logic, that's only if its like really implied shits going on in the image. Like a girl with her face braced in a grimace from a climax, not a dog's head.

[QUOTE=Viva;45362886]While generally yeah that could be sound logic, that's only if its like really implied shits going on in the image. Like a girl with her face braced in a grimace from a climax, not a dog's head.[/QUOTE] idk it's just that his old avatar was the one everyone was talking about on the first couple pages, I think it's just pushing it to have the same dog in his avatar but yeah I agree that what I said was a bit silly. As long as it's very obvious that nothing is going on then that's fine

If it's not NSFW, what's the problem?

I think if you get so assblasted over avatars to the point of adblocking them you're an idiot

I think adblocking is fine, as long as you just leave it at that and not have to call out someone like an asshole

[QUOTE=Mysterious;45362904]If it's not NSFW, what's the problem?[/QUOTE] "i don't like it therefore it's not okay"

[QUOTE=Crash155;45362907]I think if you get so assblasted over avatars to the point of adblocking them you're an idiot[/QUOTE] I don't understand this logic, not everyone wants to see certain things and it's not like we're flaming the shit out of the person in the process.