Facepunch Avatar Rules Are Too Lenient (and it's being dealt with- page 4) - General

[QUOTE=nomad1;45377142]Does that mean my avatar which was taken from the actual show will get me banned and reported? I mean I can understand my title maybe but It's been two years since it was set to that and nobody ever complained about it AFAIK.[/QUOTE] i've created a flowchart for you neanderthals [img]http://i.imgur.com/pIpVM3M.png[/img]

[QUOTE=HeroicPillow;45377121]You quite literally said: For the last few pages, people have been constantly trying to get anime/brony/furry avatars banned on the sole fact that they don't like them. You never stated "anime porn", only 'anime ones' with no specific context, and also called out avatars that are borderline nude separately. There's no point in specifically calling out something as "anime porn" or "furry porn" because it's still "porn" and would need to be blocked regardless.[/QUOTE] I apologize, just trying to discuss the original topic

[QUOTE=DrasarSalman;45376698]However, I must say that did have problems realizing that people couldn't browse Facepunch at work due to my previous avatar, though. The reason of this is because none of the comments I got about it on my profile actually mentioned that it made browsing Facepunch at work uncomfortable and appeared to mostly just be personal opinions about it, which I thought was very similar to the response most bronie avatars get and therefore ignored them. This is the reason why I did not remove the avatar before this thread reached page 4 and I already got a PM from a moderator. [/QUOTE] do you not have common fucking sense

ive never really understood people who jerk it to cartoons and ponies n shit. also, dont you fuckers dare think about making me change my avatar

[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;45377303]do you not have common fucking sense[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=DrasarSalman;45376717] [QUOTE=Rellow;45376576]eeuuuuuugh it has a cat's head, how is someone attracted to that uuuuugh[/QUOTE] Same way people are attracted to people of the same gender, I guess. Or children. Or old women. Or trees. I personally prefer the beast races because most of the mods to "beautify" the human races look uncanny as fuck.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Cone;45377033]Maybe instead of everyone having to specifically tell you that your porn habits are disgusting, you could try not showing everyone your gif of a dog drinking cum. Don't try and turn it around like "oh you didn't tell me that no one wants to see a dog lapping up jizz so it's your fault!" no one should need a practical reason for you to understand right from the start that no one wants to see your bestiality fetish, whether they browse FP at work or not.[/QUOTE] "I chose that avatar because I liked the character and the quality of the animation." I don't expect you to believe me on that, but even if you did, it would still be valid to call me a disgusting zoophile for the simple reason that I found that animation and went through the work to make an avatar of a dog drenching itself in body fluids. I'm not directly trying to deny it and instead I'll just hope that later down the line, people won't remember me as the guy who once had an avatar of a dog drenching itself in body fluids. [QUOTE=Zukriuchen;45377303]Do you not have common fucking sense?[/QUOTE] I think this post and the quote ROFLBURGER made confirmed that. I'm sorry for once using an avatar of a dog drenching itself in body fluids.

Just don't do it again, and you should be fine.

Isn't dogbutt NSFW though

No but really, you don't want a dog's butt on your screen at work.

[QUOTE=Drury;45377808]Isn't dogbutt NSFW though[/QUOTE] dogbutt is as beautiful as hasselhoff

[QUOTE=RenegadeCop;45377827]Only if you're into that I guess[/QUOTE] So for about 3/4 of the forum then [editline]13th July 2014[/editline] If it's an underage dog it's about 7/8

except that old sunglasses dog avatar isn't really porn

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;45378053]except that old sunglasses dog avatar isn't really porn[/QUOTE] honestly if we're going to ban suggestive drawn images then we should ban a literal photograph of a dogs anus hole

[QUOTE=Dermock;45378409]honestly if we're going to ban suggestive drawn images then we should ban a literal photograph of a dogs anus hole[/QUOTE] Naked animals are free to roam around but lewd images of humans are not. Blame society for not dressing every single vile creature that roams around free naked.

shouldn't it be based on perception anyway like, until you analyze dogbutt closely, it's difficult to tell what you're really looking at on the other side of things, Sasha blushing and breathing heavily is actually from an innocent moment in an anime, but it comes off as suggestive fuck it, cavemannosepick.jpg for everybody

[QUOTE=Noss;45377001]lol yes they do are you trying to tell me that people with furry/brony/anime avatars aren't fans of these series/fandoms?[/QUOTE] What is sarcasm pointed to my own avatar?

my life revolves around anime porn please dont take this from me

[QUOTE=VaultBoi;45378656]my life revolves around anime porn please dont take this from me[/QUOTE] damn me if the title doesn't fit to a T.

I didn't have issues with the what turns you on thread being full of the weirdest most fucked up shit. I just stayed out of it But I always did want Facepunch to return to its 2005 roots a little bit. There's always Reddit and plenty of subreddits if you want to look at better quality of whatever was posted in these threads, anyway, so it's not that big of a deal

I think instead we should just remove avatars and have every post a user makes personally approved by MaxOfS2D before it can be seen by anyone else. Also threads lock after one page and only have 30 posts per page, because megathreads are bad and this is a forum, a thread isn't its own website. Also remove usernames and titles, assign everyone a randomly generated number and letter chain for their posts.

[QUOTE=draugur;45378840]I think instead we should just remove avatars and have every post a user makes personally approved by MaxOfS2D before it can be seen by anyone else. Also threads lock after one page and only have 30 posts per page, because megathreads are bad and this is a forum, a thread isn't its own website. Also remove usernames and titles, assign everyone a randomly generated number and letter chain for their posts.[/QUOTE] So a shitty 2channel-type site ran by a frenchie nobody likes?

bingo. it's fresh, hip and new. the kids would love it!

why don't we take the NSFW avatars and draw lollipops and icecreams over them? sure worked with porn movies 'round the internet

i'd prefer if it was sub sandwiches personally

[QUOTE=HeroicPillow;45376854]um you're using an anime avatar tho?? can we also ban people with adventure time avatars people who watch cartoons are creepy tia[/QUOTE] Are you fucking serious

[QUOTE=ElectricSquid;45379730]Are you fucking serious[/QUOTE] Obviously not.

i am always 100% serious in regards to the heinous cartoon avatars that unrelentingly oppress our collective sanity knowing that these filth are free to roam this family friendly forums absolutely sickens me

I do have a small question: If we're banning all NSFW content across the board, can we ban Garry for posting pictures of naked RustMen? Because I find that idea repulsive, and it offends my 19th century Christian sensibilities. Also, if we could start burning people at the stake, that would be great too. It's been too long since we had a good stake burning.

This isn't about NSFW stuff but the disgusting anime. Haven't you been not reading like the rest of us?

maybe instead of shitposting (ie screaming "CHRISTIAN VALUES" or "CENSORSHIP") you guys could provide some valid reasons to why this shouldnt go through