• Drawing nude/semi-nude underage girls - is that also pedophilia?
    339 replies, posted
brb going to NJ
[QUOTE=dgg;18651355]Have fun in prison for shooting an innocent man that has done nothing wrong.[/QUOTE] shooting? wat
its not. nobody is harmed by loli, so I dont think it should be a problem with anyone.
[QUOTE=Wallettheifv3;18651966]shooting? wat[/QUOTE] Doh. Have fun in prison for comitting violence towards an innocent person that has done nothing wrong.
[QUOTE=chrissthebliss;18642884]This is slightly serious, cause me and my mate (who is a moderator of popular art website Deviant Art) had a heated discussion about this. So this is basically the story: someone, who says he has a college degree (definitely older than 18), draws semi-naked underage anime/animu girls, and uploads his stuff to Deviant Art. Some of the stuff is really borderline, yet he manages to get 6 million views, and a strong community of followers. My mate was thinking of warning him, but he changed his mind. Is that kind of stuff acceptable as art or is he some kind of sick f*ck that's going to be the next Garry Glitter?[/QUOTE] link
[QUOTE=dgg;18652018]Doh. Have fun in prison for comitting violence towards an innocent person that has done nothing wrong.[/QUOTE] Right I meant the guy OP was talking about sorry also, cops in my area don't give a shit about assault fyi
[QUOTE=demonguard;18652052]link[/QUOTE] yeah, description is kind of vague. imo it all depends on the situations and scenarios depicted in the drawings. if it's like little children in a torture device being abused yeah that's fucked up, but if it's just a child walking on the beach or something that's just art
[QUOTE=Pepsi-cola;18643993][img]http://www.ktcollectables.com.au/images/nirvana.jpg[/img] [b]NOT[/b] pedophilia I don't have anything for the other.[/QUOTE] I don't wanna see a child's penis.
How do you know thats not his umbilical cord that hasn't been snipped yet.
Pedophilia is unacceptable because children are being exploited. With drawings, no children are being exploited.
[QUOTE=plokoon9619;18652125]I don't wanna see a child's penis.[/QUOTE] [img]http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/5397/zuki.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Wallettheifv3;18652069]Right I meant the guy OP was talking about sorry also, cops in my area don't give a shit about assault fyi[/QUOTE] Yes, I'm also talking about the guy the OP is talking about. [QUOTE=Zeke129;18652208]Pedophilia is unacceptable because children are being exploited. With drawings, no children are being exploited.[/QUOTE] No children are being exploited by paedophilia. Children are being exploited by sexual acts some paedophiles do.
Lolicon is child porn, and masturbating to it makes you a pedophile. And that's perfectly fine, because it's keeping you from harming real kids.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;18652208]Pedophilia is unacceptable because children are being exploited. With drawings, no children are being exploited.[/QUOTE] but the only people that look at drawings are pedos so therefore pedos don't explot children you need to work on logic a bit more buddy
[QUOTE=dgg;18652240]No children are being exploited by paedophilia. Children are being exploited by sexual acts some paedophiles do.[/QUOTE] Having their photos taken (either against their will or against parental consent) is exploitation.
[QUOTE=Uberman77883;18652143]How do you know thats not his umbilical cord that hasn't been snipped yet.[/QUOTE] Because the belly button is above it maybe? [editline]12:59AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Zeke129;18652278]Having their photos taken (either against their will or against parental consent) is exploitation.[/QUOTE] Yes. But that's child porn. Not paedophilia. It's done by paedophiles, but it is the act of some paedophiles, not paedohpiles as a whole.
[QUOTE=Cheesemonkey;18652270]but the only people that look at drawings are pedos so therefore pedos don't explot children you need to work on logic a bit more buddy[/QUOTE] That's not even the same general idea as what I was saying.
Simpler said Zeke. All black people commit crime. right?
[QUOTE=Zeke129;18652278]Having their photos taken (either against their will or against parental consent) is exploitation.[/QUOTE] yeah pedophiles don't do that. those are child rapists/exploiters not all pedos diddle little kids.
[QUOTE=dgg;18652290]Yes. But that's child porn. Not paedophilia.[/QUOTE] I never denied this, it's just that "pedophilia" is usually used to refer to child pornography, so I assumed this is what OP meant. [editline]06:01PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Cheesemonkey;18652329]yeah pedophiles don't do that. those are child rapist not all pedos diddle little kids.[/QUOTE] I just read your title, and now I know why you're posting these things. I also lol'd in disgust.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;18652331]I never denied this, it's just that "pedophilia" is usually used to refer to child pornography, so I assumed this is what OP meant.[/QUOTE] What? Paedophilia is never refered to as child porn. Child porn is refered to child porn. Paedophilia is a term used against people that are attracted to children.
[QUOTE=dgg;18652351]What? Paedophilia is never refered to as child porn. Child porn is refered to child porn. Paedophilia is a term used against people that are attracted to children.[/QUOTE] Pedophiles are people who are attracted to children, I know. You just never hear the term "child pornographer" used, you hear the former used instead.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;18652405]Pedophiles are people who are attracted to children, I know. You just never hear the term "child pornographer" used, you hear the former used instead.[/QUOTE] Yes. A paedophile took the pictures. But that doesn't mean that everytime somebody mentions paedophile it must mean a guy that rapes or takes pictures of children.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;18652405]Pedophiles are people who are attracted to children, I know. You just never hear the term "child pornographer" used, you hear the former used instead.[/QUOTE] Zeke please read the rest of the thread, I've already talked about the difference between the two a few times. I guess I was right about the cycle starting again.
[QUOTE=HookJ;18652497]Zeke please read the rest of the thread, I've already talked about the difference between the two a few times. I guess I was right about the cycle starting again.[/QUOTE] You don't really expect anyone to read anything past page 2 do you?
[QUOTE=dgg;18652519]You don't really expect anyone to read anything past page 2 do you?[/QUOTE] I guess not, but it would be really convenient. But hey, at least that ignorant furry gave up trying to out debate us?
Semantics are serious business.
[QUOTE=HookJ;18652540]I guess not, but it would be really convenient. But hey, at least that ignorant furry gave up trying to out debate us?[/QUOTE] Of course it would, but no one bothers wasting their time reading hundreds of posts just to check if what they say have been said. That's why I hardly post in threads that has gone beyond two pages, it's just too much and most arguments have been used. Yeah, we didn't even have to use his avatar as an example to point out his stupidity.
[QUOTE=HookJ;18652497]Zeke please read the rest of the thread, I've already talked about the difference between the two a few times. I guess I was right about the cycle starting again.[/QUOTE] I'm not arguing the difference, I know the difference. I'm just mentioning the semantics of it.
[QUOTE=dgg;18652575]Of course it would, but no one bothers wasting their time reading hundreds of posts just to check if what they say have been said. That's why I hardly post in threads that has gone beyond two pages, it's just too much and most arguments have been used. Yeah, we didn't even have to use his avatar as an example to point out his stupidity.[/QUOTE] Nice working with you. [img]http://www.esquire.com/media/cm/esquire/images/high-five-0808-lg-76258126.jpg[/img]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.