• Was 9/11 an inside job? An honest question.
    115 replies, posted
I think a lot of people actually believe the government did it because it fell straight down, but they fail to realize that skyscrapers are made that way, so that they don't fall into a bunch of other buildings
I think its a disgrace to be talking about who did it on the anniversary. Any other day
Most likely not.
If we take every existing conspiracy theory for granted then we would all be dead from nuclear war.
[QUOTE=Tetracycline;24747842]I think a lot of people actually believe the government did it because it fell straight down, but they fail to realize that skyscrapers are made that way, so that they don't fall into a bunch of other buildings[/QUOTE] Yeah but people who cite this as evidence aren't too bright because I'm sure if those safety measures weren't in order, and it still fell straight down, it would be stupid obvious. If you get what I'm saying. But there is much much more credible evidence out there
It was a terrorist attack, I don't know why people won't just accept that.
[QUOTE=teeheeV2;24747854]I think its a disgrace to be talking about who did it on the anniversary. Any other day[/QUOTE] You can say that, OR you can say that because this is the anniversary more people are likely to pay attention to conspiracy theorists who probably get little attention. but w/e
No one is bothering to mention building 7... it literally collapsed due to 'fire' despite not even being hit by any plane! How could that have possibly caused it to collapse if a steel reinforced building has never collapsed in that manner before? To those interested in the truth I have only to offer this source of information: [url]http://wtc7.net/[/url]
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;24747910]No one is bothering to mention building 7... it literally collapsed due to 'fire' despite not even being hit by any plane! How could that have possibly caused it to collapse if a steel reinforced building has never collapsed in that manner before?[/QUOTE] Demons
The attacks were committed by radical muslims. I do, however, think that United 93 might have been shot down once NORAD realized it was headed towards DC. It is extremely likely that they would have seen the Pentagon burning and headed towards the White House with their plane.
Even if people deserve to know, why the fuck would they wait so many years to tell us?
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;24747802]People died and deserve the right to know the truth. Regardless of what the truth is, the official story has several inconsistancies that have obviously caused a VAST number of people to call foul play... if [I]hypothetically[/I] the government was involved, the people [B]deserve [/B]to know.[/QUOTE] The official story has caused people who refuse to ever believe the official story to call foul play.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;24747910]No one is bothering to mention building 7... it literally collapsed due to 'fire' despite not even being hit by any plane! How could that have possibly caused it to collapse if a steel reinforced building has never collapsed in that manner before?[/QUOTE] You are the typical theorist We explained to you in the news thread how it WAS hit by a piece of debris and had a 20 story gash in it side.
If you think this, you're an idiot because: A. You actually think the monkeys working for the US can put together something like that and cover it up. and B. You think that it's hidden so well that WikiLeaks hasn't leaked it yet.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;24747910]No one is bothering to mention building 7... it literally collapsed due to 'fire' despite not even being hit by any plane! How could that have possibly caused it to collapse if a steel reinforced building has never collapsed in that manner before? To those interested in the truth I have only to offer this source of information: [URL]http://wtc7.net/[/URL][/QUOTE] Actually, fire was principle to the destruction of Towers 1 and 2.
-snip-
[QUOTE=teeheeV2;24747942]You are the typical theorist We explained to you in the news thread how it WAS hit by a piece of debris and had a 20 story gash in it side.[/QUOTE] Wheres your evidence? If you've got nothing to show for your talk then :fuckoff:
[QUOTE=Jookia;24747943]If you think this, you're an idiot because: A. You actually think the monkeys working for the US can put together something like that and cover it up. and B. You think that it's hidden so well that WikiLeaks hasn't leaked it yet.[/QUOTE] This is a good point. It's not easy hiding something like this.
[QUOTE=Billiam;24747969]Actually, fire was principle to the destruction of Towers 1 and 2.[/QUOTE] True but prior to 9/11 such a thing had never occurred before. What makes those buildings so special?
[QUOTE=Billiam;24747969]Actually, fire was principle to the destruction of Towers 1 and 2.[/QUOTE] I read somewhere that the kind of structural steel used in the towers resists 5x as much heat as a fire like that could produce
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;24747988]Wheres your evidence? If you've got nothing to show for your talk then :fuckoff:[/QUOTE] With great claims require great evidence and backing
[QUOTE=Billiam;24747992]This is a good point. It's not easy hiding something like this.[/QUOTE] This is a self destroying comment; maybe they're just so darn [I]good [/I]at it :iiam:
[QUOTE=Jookia;24747943]If you think this, you're an idiot because: A. You actually think the monkeys working for the US can put together something like that and cover it up. and B. You think that it's hidden so well that WikiLeaks hasn't leaked it yet.[/QUOTE] Not saying I agree or disagree with inside job or anything... but wasn't the 7th tower full of documents that would have the plans for something like this?
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;24747995]True but prior to 9/11 such a thing had never occurred before. What makes those buildings so special?[/QUOTE] A jet ran into them [editline]11:09PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Floreum;24748029]Not saying I agree or disagree with inside job or anything... but wasn't the 7th tower full of documents that would have the plans for something like this?[/QUOTE] lol
I've posted multiple sources throughout the thread... no one has bothered to read them and is stuck in what they 'think' they know. Take evidence from both sides and then come to a conclusion, that's all I'm asking.
[QUOTE=Diet Kane;24747697]It was Abraham Lincoln did it after being possessed by James Wilkes Booth. JFK supplied the planes with Hitler's Jewish Nazi gold.[/QUOTE] the evidence is undeniable
[QUOTE=Tetracycline;24748037]A jet ran into them [/QUOTE] Building 7 had no such jet impact and yet collapsed in entirety like the other towers.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;24748043]I've posted multiple sources throughout the thread... no one has bothered to read them and is stuck in what they 'think' they know. Take evidence from both sides and then come to a conclusion, that's all I'm asking.[/QUOTE] I posted your 911 research thing onto the OP [editline]11:11PM[/editline] [QUOTE=ShukaidoX;24748068]Building 7 had no such jet impact and yet collapsed in entirety like the other towers... like a demolition.[/QUOTE] They got hit by debris and fire fucked it up
[QUOTE=Tetracycline;24748069]I posted your 911 research thing onto the OP [editline]11:11PM[/editline] They got hit by debris and fire fucked it up[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://wtc7.net/docs/streamers.jpg[/IMG] Does that really look like it's been hit by a gash and it's collapsing due to fire...? ALSO, source on debris pls Oh and this building was [B]reduced to rubble.[/B]
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;24748081][IMG]http://wtc7.net/docs/streamers.jpg[/IMG] Does that really look like it's been hit by a gash and it's collapsing due to fire...? Oh and this building was [B]reduced to rubble.[/B][/QUOTE] Can you see the other side
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.