• Was 9/11 an inside job? An honest question.
    115 replies, posted
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;24748183]It's never happened before 9/11. Not once. A steel reinforced building burned for over 48 hours and didn't collapse, and you mean to say that now out of the blue it makes sense for it to occur? That is absurd. There are numerous red flags in the official story, which requires a long series of highly improbable coincidences. Questioning it is an act of responsible citizenship.[/QUOTE] it was hit by a MOTHERFUCKING JET We went over this is the last thread, more evidence you are a typical theorist
[QUOTE=Sputn!k;24748519][URL="http://www.ae911truth.org/"]Why it just so happens I have a link right here, just for you[/URL][/QUOTE] Can you actually provide a direct link to this proof? All I got was another conspiracy website asking me to sign a petition.
[QUOTE=teeheeV2;24748534]it was hit by a MOTHERFUCKING JET We went over this is the last thread, more evidence you are a typical theorist[/QUOTE] [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center#Collapse"]Mmmm, wrong.[/URL]
[QUOTE=Sputn!k;24748519][URL="http://www.ae911truth.org/"]Why it just so happens I have a link right here, just for you[/URL][/QUOTE] There are more on the other side y'know
[QUOTE=teeheeV2;24748534]it was hit by a MOTHERFUCKING JET We went over this is the last thread, more evidence you are a typical theorist[/QUOTE] You really are ignorant aren't you? We're talking about a completely different building that collapsed on 9/11, [B][I]NOT[/I][/B], the 2 WTC towers. :frog:
[QUOTE=Sputn!k;24748561][URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center#Collapse"]Mmmm, wrong.[/URL][/QUOTE] Yeah, it was hit by this: [img]http://www.thepowermall.com/911inplanesite/images2005/01_wtc7.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=lulzbocks;24748586]Yeah, it was hit by this: [IMG]http://www.thepowermall.com/911inplanesite/images2005/01_wtc7.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] Thats the building's architecture you dolt. Here's a picture of the building's 'damage' after WTC 1 collapsed. [IMG]http://www.wtc7.net/docs/June2004WTC7_Page_15_cropped.jpg[/IMG] You can see what im talking about in the picture, and there is hardly any major debris damage to speak for. Yet the building was reduced to rubble and the steel recycled before an investigation team could even thoroughly check the site.
[QUOTE=Tetracycline;24748563]There are more on the other side y'know[/QUOTE] That's because that side has the indifferent demographic, who will take the side that gets the less flak.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;24748624]Thats the building's architecture you dolt. Here's a picture of the building's 'damage' after WTC 1 collapsed. [IMG]http://www.wtc7.net/docs/June2004WTC7_Page_15_cropped.jpg[/IMG] You can see what im talking about in the picture, and there is hardly any major debris damage to speak for. Yet the building was reduced to rubble and the steel recycled before an investigation team could even thoroughly check the site.[/QUOTE] That picture doesn't show the 8th and 18th floor from the south face.
[QUOTE=Billiam;24748728]That picture doesn't show the 8th and 18th floor from the south face.[/QUOTE] For you, gold member. [img]http://www.wtc7.net/docs/June2004WTC7_Page_16_cropped.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;24748747]For you, gold member. [img]http://www.wtc7.net/docs/June2004WTC7_Page_16_cropped.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] that looks pretty hefty to me
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;24748624]Thats the building's architecture you dolt. Here's a picture of the building's 'damage' after WTC 1 collapsed. [IMG]http://www.wtc7.net/docs/June2004WTC7_Page_15_cropped.jpg[/IMG] You can see what im talking about in the picture, and there is hardly any major debris damage to speak for. Yet the building was reduced to rubble and the steel recycled before an investigation team could even thoroughly check the site.[/QUOTE] Good God... that's probably the worst possible angle you could possibly tkae a picture of that building from.
This is just a modern-day reincarnation of all the Moon Landing conspiracy theorists. It's still stupid now.
[QUOTE=zzzZZZZ;24748786]This is just a modern-day reincarnation of all the Moon Landing conspiracy theorists. It's still stupid now.[/QUOTE] :frog:
[QUOTE=The Vman;24748355]I like how all your "sources" are conspiracy theorist websites that have 911 or WTC in the title. Try to find a legimitate source and we might listen to you.[/QUOTE] But this site archives and lists what legitimate news sources have been saying. So far what I've found is mostly interesting. Take the time to look online for these sources if you do have any doubt about what it says. So far these gave interesting readings. [url]http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/groundzero/cleanup.html[/url] [url]http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/destroyed.html[/url] Whatever the crime scene, if true to sources, regardless of terrorism or conspiracy, they did a horrible job with containing and storing critical evidence appropriately. I have no final decisions on what happened at 911, and I honestly don't know.
gawd dengit we need smartness ratings what's the opposite of a box
[QUOTE=zzzZZZZ;24748786]This is just a modern-day reincarnation of all the Moon Landing conspiracy theorists. It's still stupid now.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Sputn!k;24748809]:frog:[/QUOTE] No Sputn!k, he's right. I'm done trying to convince you how stupid you are. I just hope that you will stop deluding yourself soon and that you realize that you, and all the other conspiracy theorists are in a tiny majority.
[QUOTE=lulzbocks;24748839]No Sputn!k, he's right. I'm done trying to convince you how stupid you are. I just hope that you will stop deluding yourself soon and that you realize that you, and all the other conspiracy theorists are in a tiny majority.[/QUOTE] Isn't that called a minority
[url]http://www.debunking911.com/[/url]
Wait, I'm confused; who in this thread is A) believing a conspiracy B) not believing a conspiracy C) sad for 9/11 D) annoyed by 9/11
It was an inside job and an outside job. [editline]08:22AM[/editline] [QUOTE=The Vman;24748355]I like how all your "sources" are conspiracy theorist websites that have 911 or WTC in the title. Try to find a legimitate source and we might listen to you.[/QUOTE] A website with 911 or WTC is perfectly legitimate or would you prefer something that CNN or BBC reported?
[QUOTE=lulzbocks;24748839]I'm done trying to convince you how stupid you are. I just hope that you will stop deluding yourself soon and that you realize that you, and all the other conspiracy theorists are in a tiny majority.[/QUOTE] Haven't you heard of logical exchange of ideas that doesn't involve using ad hominem to try to prove a point? Between the 'main' story and all the conspiracy theories... somewhere the truth lies in the middle.
[QUOTE=lulzbocks;24748839]No Sputn!k, he's right. I'm done trying to convince you how stupid you are. I just hope that you will stop deluding yourself soon and that you realize that you, and all the other conspiracy theorists are in a tiny majority.[/QUOTE] the frog was for him being not serious and condescending
Why would the govt blow up building 7? Just for the hell of it?
[quote=sputn!k;24748890]wait, i'm confused; who in this thread is a) believing a conspiracy b) not believing a conspiracy c) sad for 9/11 d) annoyed by 9/11[/quote] bcd
[QUOTE=Tetracycline;24748852]Isn't that called a minority[/QUOTE] LOL! Bad typo, thanks.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.