[QUOTE=FreezingStorm;25237367]I was wondering what the inside of the eye looked like.[/QUOTE]
google images bro
Yesterday my Blue Chromis died. Usually my lobster get's to the dead before I do, so I took the opportunity to do a microscopic dissection(the fish was only an inch long). Looking into the eye of a fish through a microscope was fascinating. Removing it and looking at the lens directly was even better. The fish was given a proper funeral via the toilet. R.I.P little blue guy.
Eye love science.
i still don't get it - i imagine the changes are gradual in evolution, so how could a change so small make such a big difference in something's survivability? moreover how do those changes carry from generation to generation and continue to change in that set way
[QUOTE=Archy;25239612]i still don't get it - i imagine the changes are gradual in evolution, so how could a change so small make such a big difference in something's survivability? moreover how do those changes carry from generation to generation and continue to change in that set way[/QUOTE]
because a small change that helps is better then 1 that doesnt, and the 2nd question its not a set path but anything that helps will spread
[QUOTE=Archy;25239612]i still don't get it - i imagine the changes are gradual in evolution, so how could a change so small make such a big difference in something's survivability? moreover how do those changes carry from generation to generation and continue to change in that set way[/QUOTE]
The difference between 2 generations may be so small that it won't affect survivability much at all, but this is over thousands of generations through millions of different animals. Even a small change can have a huge outcome when dealing with numbers like that.
As much as eye admire Mr. Dawkins, I envy the pupils that fall under his teaching even more so. Too bad this thread's littered with puns where one is cornea than the next.
[QUOTE=Archy;25239612]i still don't get it - i imagine the changes are gradual in evolution, so how could a change so small make such a big difference in something's survivability? moreover how do those changes carry from generation to generation and continue to change in that set way[/QUOTE]
I think I get what you're asking. How could an organism with a [i]slightly[/i] more round eye be better at surviving with one [i]slightly[/i] less round? Well the answer is it doesn't survive better. However, its genes are forever changed, so when some of its offspring obtain even more [i]slightly[/i] rounded eyes, by pure chance mind you, soon the difference between our original organism is enough that those offspring will survive more frequently than the original.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.