• Is World War III on the abroad?
    82 replies, posted
[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;22303099]World Wars are outlawed in the Geneva Convention. I'm unsure if it's the third or forth Geneva Convention.[/QUOTE] Sorry, but nobody cares for the Geneva Convention when it comes to an actual war. Thngs may sound nce and pretty on paper, but when it comes to a war nobody will care.
[QUOTE=Duecez;22297819]Is it just me, or does it seem like some people here actually want WWIII to happen? :tinfoil:[/QUOTE] I would, because then I'd atleast have a chance at a job in the army :v:
[QUOTE=Chekko;22299279]Give EU a few years and they will probably attack the US.[/QUOTE] Because that would be smart :downs:
[QUOTE=Chekko;22299279]Give EU a few years and they will probably attack the US.[/QUOTE] AHAHAHAHA no
I don't think it is gonna happen super soon, but there have been a lot of minor skirmishes lately, so who knows...
[QUOTE=ashzu;22297263]OP just came back from MW2 game[/QUOTE] Stupid weeaboo faggot making stupid ass fucking assumptions.
Nothing.
No.
I swear, you make the worst threads. Even so, whenever someone points this out you use some form of an ad hominem to retort. Are you 10 years old or something?
[QUOTE=mastermaul;22297097]There's about 1 country in the world that absolutely hates the west capable of waging a world war. China of course. Err well i shouldn't say absolutely hates. But you get the picture.[/QUOTE] Who do you think makes the US weaponry. China probably loves the US military industrial complex.
World War? Not very likely. Nuclear War? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. Highly improbable, ever since nukes were introduced, mutually assured destruction has scared countries off from starting nuclear war.
Will something happen? Probably. Will it have some lasting affect? That's a given. Will it result in a massive war? There is a possibility, but it's slim. Will it result in WORLD war? Very unlikely. Will it result in Nuclear war? Maybe, the chances are slim based on how slim the chances are of world war.
A world war at this age would end quite quickly.
2012 is coming..... and it's just a coincidence things start to get ugly now.
[QUOTE=Monkeytracks;22316439]2012 is coming..... and it's just a coincidence things start to get ugly now.[/QUOTE] 1999 was coming, and it was just a coincidence that there was a potential computer error.
[QUOTE=Monkeytracks;22316439]2012 is coming..... and it's just a coincidence things start to get ugly now.[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://www.anthroblogs.org/nomadicthoughts/archives/maya_cartoon.JPG[/IMG]
Yeah, like its been mentioned NK may have the fourth largest army (last time I checked) in the world, but it doesn't do them much good if they are faced against the rest of the world. Also, the tactics/strategy/coordination of their army would be very poor in the result of war when compared to countries like America. They don't have the same technologies/weapons/fundings
[QUOTE=Chekko;22299279]Give EU a few years and they will probably attack the US.[/QUOTE] You might need to lay off the Tom Clancy.
NK don't have the balls to do anything.
[QUOTE=BANNED USER;22297300]No, The rising tension between North and South Korea isn't enough to start another world war. Also, it is known that China, North Korea's ally, condemns them for their actions and will not assist them if a full blown conflict arises. On top of that, nobody else has stated that they would be involved one way or another, except for America having naval exercises with SK.[/QUOTE]If South Korea is attacked, the US will most likely declare war on NK, there is a US division stationed in SK, with American soldiers patrolling the DMZ. So an attack on South Korean troops is an attack on American troops as well.
Well...time to put on my Vault 354 jumpsuit on
WWIII will go to your house and fight
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.