• Gay Chat V12 - Even More Optimistic
    5,002 replies, posted
[QUOTE=kimr120;46948014]What?[/QUOTE] he called you a "tranny"
Uuuh no, I am definitely not.
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;46948024]he called you a "tranny"[/QUOTE] No, it's a reference to the video a few posts above.
[QUOTE=MaddaCheeb;46948179]No, it's a reference to the video a few posts above.[/QUOTE] im right and you're wrong
Just saw The Imitation Game, it was very good but quite depressing.
[QUOTE=Chickens!;46948352]Just saw The Imitation Game, it was very good but quite depressing.[/QUOTE] I wanted to see that with my dad because we were bored one day then I actually looked up what it was about ...yeah, no, he'd have a field day with that film if he saw it.
Falling Down was pretty good in my opinion. It had a super sad ending that made me cry but the whole journey to the end was great.
What really does a movie in for me are isolated epiphanies, eerie disorientation, or sound cut outs. No idea why, but if a movie has these in it, I will probably immediately like it.
I start shooting my documentary tomorrow. Excited but really nervous that I'll mess up the interview and camerawork. Never shot a documentary before.
Good luck :D
[QUOTE=MaddaCheeb;46951153]I start shooting my documentary tomorrow. Excited but really nervous that I'll mess up the interview and camerawork. Never shot a documentary before.[/QUOTE] I didn't hear about this! What are you making a Documentary of anyway?
[QUOTE=Pvt. Martin;46951242]I didn't hear about this! What are you making a Documentary of anyway?[/QUOTE] Independent filmmaking in Utah. For some reason, Utah has a really large community and culture around independent filmmakers unlike any other state in the U.S., and it's never really had a light shone on it before. So my goal is to kinda dig down and find out why.
[QUOTE=Ax3l;46925674]Homosex is in. :^)[/QUOTE] You have Pat as your avatar. I am ready for the sex of homo.
[QUOTE=Chickens!;46948352]Just saw The Imitation Game, it was very good but quite depressing.[/QUOTE] Wonderful film, really well done. Hope it wins some oscars.
[QUOTE=TheDrunkenOne;46943086]Bi here. It's true that you get the best of both worlds, but it's weird whenever your sexuality is brought up. If you say "I'm gay" or "I'm straight" people will go like "oh okay", and if you're bi people will go like "so..you're confused?" or "so you haven't chosen yet?" and it can get irritating if you're always in conversations with others. I usually tend to avoid having people bring up questions about my sexuality, since I don't want them to get either confused or get a bad impression of me. I like both genders equally, and don't consider myself to lean towards one more than the other, while people tend to think that being bi means to lean towards a gender 80% of the times, hence why some say that bisexual people are "confused". But if you put that argument aside, it is the best of both worlds indeed.[/QUOTE] I've gotten really tired of the "bi isn't real" motto so as of right now I don't really go by labels. I guess if I had to I'd be gay, because guys… guys are just great, man. When I first came out, I came out as bi but I knew for fact that I was more 80% guys than other 50/50 bisex's. Having the best of both worlds isn't quite as best as I would have hoped. I mean, I'm a good looking guy—but it just becomes too much. Like the many pros and cons for the question "Popeyes or Mcdonalds." [editline]16th January 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;46944655]Oh that reminds me I laughed pretty hard when I saw that scene and my dad was like "Why did you find that funny" or something like woah fuck you dad[/QUOTE] hahaha "you see dad, when a daddy and another daddy really like each other…"
You are a bunch of self centered faggots. But you are the only people i fell comfortable sharing my experiences with. I love you all. Goodluck.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;46951708]WELL up yours.... D'awww all is forgiven.[/QUOTE] zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzthank you <3
Isn't avoiding the bi label perpetuating ignorance about bisexuality? Maybe people need to have the conversation even if it is stupid.
[QUOTE=gerbe1;46951892]Isn't avoiding the bi label perpetuating ignorance about bisexuality? Maybe people need to have the conversation even if it is stupid.[/QUOTE] its just gotten all convoluted as of recent with the surge of people going "NO IM NOT BI IM PAN, ITS 100 PERCENT COMPLETELY DIFFERENT STOP OPPRESSING MY SEXUALITY" [editline]17th January 2015[/editline] anyways on the topic of movies too, a lot of people who came out of The Imitation Game had no idea who Alan Turing was, or they did and didnt know he was gay :v Also i caught Inherent Vice the other day and like....im on the fence about it. I enjoyed it, a pretty good amount too, but it really wasn't that good of a movie. Terrible pacing, but thats due mostly to the cinematography actually as they tried to influence how scenes were shot depending on the drugs being used. The plots loose and it is a Noir type detective movie so the name of the game is details, red herrings and such. But they introduce details and aspects and just completely forget about them, those aren't red herrings. They tried to set them up like that but failed. Josh Brolin was excellent in it, despite his character kind of being badly written, and while i loved the lead guy, he didn't deserve the nomination for Golden Globe for it.
Pansexualism and bisexualism are different though. Similar, but different. But maybe I'm not allowed to represent that opinion since I am Pansexual.
Whats even the difference?
[QUOTE=Bumrang;46952176]Whats even the difference?[/QUOTE] Bisexual means that you are attracted to both males and females. Pansexual means that you are attracted to anything that classifies as a human??
[QUOTE=Bumrang;46952176]Whats even the difference?[/QUOTE] I will attempt to be brief since I'm on my phone and my phone doesn't like all these new fangled sexual words Bisexualism is being attracted to both men and women, but similar to straight and gay it relies on a full gender binary. A straight woman would date male gendered men, but probably wouldn't date a pre-op trans woman despite sexual parts being the same, likewise she likely wouldn't date a pre-op trans man for the opposite reason, gender is right but sex isn't. Bi is similar, it is attraction to masculine men and feminine women but not necessarily anything that doesn't fall in those categories. Pansexual is simply more inclusive being an attraction to any sex, gender, or identity. For that reason it is sometimes described as an attraction based on personality instead of physical feature, but personally I don't like that since appearance still matters, simply gender and sex related characteristics don't. Edit: In short I like tits and I like dicks and I like men and I like women and I like other identified just fine as well, and to top it off I don't care what combination those features appear in. Also, the above description is not to say bi people wouldn't necessarily date other identities it's just not something considered In the word itself since it was popular long before varied identities became a commonly more accepted topic. It's a personal identification thing, words are to help us describe ourselves, just because someone chooses to identify with one word or another certainly shouldn't limit what they can and can't do based on that word
I know that it doesn't mean you are attracted to pans. Learned that one pretty quick. [editline]17th January 2015[/editline] Oh mah merge ;_;
[QUOTE=Rhenae;46952202]I will attempt to be brief since I'm on my phone and my phone doesn't like all these new fangled sexual words Bisexualism is being attracted to both men and women, but similar to straight and gay it relies on a full gender binary. A straight woman would date male gendered men, but probably wouldn't date a pre-op trans woman despite sexual parts being the same, likewise she likely wouldn't date a pre-op trans man for the opposite reason, gender is right but sex isn't. Bi is similar, it is attraction to masculine men and feminine women but not necessarily anything that doesn't fall in those categories. Pansexual is simply more inclusive being an attraction to any sex, gender, or identity. For that reason it is sometimes described as an attraction based on personality instead of physical feature, but personally I don't like that since appearance still matters, simply gender and sex related characteristics don't.[/QUOTE] aye but even thats flawed as you brought in 'gender binary' to the mix which completely changes everything and makes a heavy implication that if you're bi you want to go for masculine men and feminine women exclusively when thats incredibly false. A lot of people i've encountered who identify as pan have no idea what bisexuality really means and affix 'rules' to sexuality incorrectly and just assume its a rigid term when it's not even remotely. Much like what you just did but they would often do it to a much heavier extent. Then again it doesn't help that those people more or less identified as pan merely because they found a way to pompously say they're bi and don't care about gender. So they get into it in the first place for the wrong reason. Sexuality is still largely a subjective thing though when it boils down to it and there is no real standard for any sexuality.
[QUOTE=Viva;46952229]aye but even thats flawed as you brought in 'gender binary' to the mix which completely changes everything and makes a heavy implication that if you're bi you want to for masculine men and feminine women when thats incredibly false. A lot of people i've encountered who identify as pan have no idea what bisexuality really means and affix 'rules' to sexuality incorrectly and just assume. Much like what you just did but they would often do it to a much heavier extent. Then again it doesn't help that those people more or less identified as pan merely because they found a way to pompously say they're bi and don't care about gender. So they get into it in the first place for the wrong reason. Sexuality is still largely a subjective thing though when it boils down to it and there is no real standard for any sexuality.[/QUOTE] Edit ed my original to be more clear before reading this. It's not really a restriction on people who chose to use the word It's more the original intent of the word, bisexual, two sexes. I choose to use the word pan to be more clear I'm open to options outside those two original identities, but not everyone does or needs to.
pretty much bisexulity you still factor in gender, but its far from being an exclusive thing.
So I assume pansexual would be my thing then. I'm more of a guy who goes for personality and don't mind trans as partners.
How coincidental that I was just thinking about this same argument while in the shower this morning.
I just say I'm bi at the moment, until I know myself well enough to actually define my sexuality. Some people have actually assumed I was asexual in the past, but that's not true. I'm just shy as heck when it comes to personal stuff. I want to explore my sexuality, and I guess the first start is letting people know, but I never feel like it's relevant. Relevancy kills off all conversation though I guess, since on some level nothing is relevant. That, and I don't actually know what I'm about, so I can't talk about it. But I can't find out if I don't talk about it. Irritating. I just don't consider the question deeply enough very often, and when I do I get distracted and stop. Either I don't care, or it's just more comfortable to not think about who I am.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.