As long as the card doesn't cost my entire bank account and run's everything i want it to fine i dont give a fuck who made it tbh.
[QUOTE=Mr_Razzums;24243616]My 5770 is hella loud.[/QUOTE]
No sound here..
I agree with this video. My GTS250 is fucking OBNOXIOUS.
1) MSI Afterburner
2) Custom fan profiles
Problem solved.
I don't get why Nvidiafags and ATIfags have to argue, it's just as bad as the console war. They're both good companies and they both make cards that are equally as powerful as their counterpart.
[QUOTE=Mr.Cookie;24257620]I don't get why Nvidiafags and ATIfags have to argue, it's just as bad as the console war. They're both good companies and they both make cards that are[b] equally[/b] as powerful as their counterpart.[/QUOTE]
Untrue.
[QUOTE=B1N4RY!;24257634]Untrue.[/QUOTE]
Suck my dick nigger.
In all seriousness though, the differences are too miniscule for me to give a shit
[QUOTE=Mr.Cookie;24257675]In all seriousness though, the difference are too miniscule for me to give a shit[/QUOTE]
Actually, no you're wrong.
General performance isn't the only aspect that should be placed into consideration when comparing two opposing series. Other considerations may include power consumption, heat output, and the need for certain proprietary features such as PhysX and CUDA.
Performance wise, it's also quite significant depending on which cards/models are available at the moment, as well as which aspect of performance you are looking at. For instance, Some of the Radeon cards will perform better than the mid-range Fermi cards (such as the 460 and 465) under DX10, whilst the mid-range Fermi cards can some times blow away the high end Radeon cards in DX 11.
For those that are interested in GPU computing, some of the cheaper cards made by one company can significantly outperform its counterpart in double precision calculations
[QUOTE=B1N4RY!;24257774]Actually, no you're wrong.
General performance isn't the only aspect that should be placed into consideration when comparing two opposing series. Other considerations may include power consumption, heat output, and the need for certain proprietary features such as PhysX and CUDA.
Performance wise, it's also quite significant depending on which cards/models are available at the moment, as well as which aspect of performance you are looking at. For instance, Some of the Radeon cards will perform better than the mid-range Fermi cards (such as the 460 and 465) under DX10, whilst the mid-range Fermi cards can some times blow away the high end Radeon cards in DX 11.
For those that are interested in GPU computing, some of the cheaper cards made by one company can significantly outperform its counterpart in double precision calculations[/QUOTE]
How about we go back to what I said earlier and suck my dick nigger
[editline]07:47AM[/editline]
do
[editline]07:48AM[/editline]
it
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Flaming / trolling / racism" - birkett))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Mr.Cookie;24257620]I don't get why Nvidiafags and ATIfags have to argue, it's just as bad as the console war. They're both good companies and they both make cards that are equally as powerful as their counterpart.[/QUOTE]
They are two companies that both make [B]GOOD[/B] video cards. People have to stop arguing about them.
But I have to say, Nvidia has more features such as PhysX and CUDA whilst ATi has the most powerful desktop card available.
[QUOTE=Mr.Cookie;24257854]How about we go back to what I said earlier and suck my dick nigger
[editline]07:47AM[/editline]
do
[editline]07:48AM[/editline]
it[/QUOTE]
Make me :colbert:
[QUOTE=B1N4RY!;24257882]Make me :colbert:[/QUOTE]
I'll come to your house and I'll do it.
[QUOTE=K1ngo64;24257861]
But I have to say, Nvidia has more features such as PhysX and CUDA whilst [b]ATi has the most powerful desktop card available.[/b][/QUOTE]
Not until nV releases their dual-fermi card
[editline]12:51AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Mr.Cookie;24257895]I'll come to your house and I'll do it.[/QUOTE]
You know where I live, I'll be waiting
[QUOTE=B1N4RY!;24257896]
You know where I live, I'll be waiting[/QUOTE]
Wash your mouth bitch, I don't want your herpes.
A GTX480 can beat a 5970 in a handful of DX11 games, and comes real close in most others. DX10 included.
Just sayin.
[QUOTE=K1ngo64;24257861]They are two companies that both make [B]GOOD[/B] video cards. People have to stop arguing about them.
But I have to say, Nvidia has more features such as PhysX and CUDA whilst ATi has the most powerful desktop card available.[/QUOTE]
Someone said that ATI (or AMD) should acquire Havok Physics, so that they can actually have competition against PhysX.
I don't think about brand when it comes to buying a new GPU, I just look at both companies and see which one has the cheapest to power ratio in my budget for that moment in time.
The 8800gt sounds like that dental drill but I still <3 it.
[QUOTE=K1ngo64;24257861]They are two companies that both make [B]GOOD[/B] video cards. People have to stop arguing about them.
But I have to say, Nvidia has more features such as PhysX and CUDA whilst ATi has the most powerful desktop card available.[/QUOTE]
ATI has ATI Stream, which is more or less the counterpart to CUDA. Not that is really going to matter since it'll all be properly standardized in the next couple of years through OpenCL and DirectX 11.
[editline]10:32PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Dr Bob;24260251]Someone said that ATI (or AMD) should acquire Havok Physics, so that they can actually have competition against PhysX.[/QUOTE]
Nah, physics engines should just stop fucking around and start using OpenCL or DX11.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
