• Batman: Return to Arkham Graphics Comparison
    124 replies, posted
If not for labels, I too thought remastered was on right, not left. It either looks the same or worse in most cases, I'm confused.
might be aiming for 60fps on consoles like naughty dog did with their versions. but the difference is naughty dog just optimized the engine a shitload to work amazingly on newer gens, this is just being lazy and lowering the graphics for the extra frames.
I don't see a reason that they'd have to lower visual fidelity to increase the performance. These are previous gen games are they not? PS4 and Xbone should be able to match the original on consoles at 60 fps at the very least. This remaster looks like garbage tier work.
[QUOTE=Greendead;50371562]They were probably aiming for 60 FPS so they had to downgrade the graphics. I really don't see any other reason why it looks so bad. [editline]22nd May 2016[/editline] [img]http://i.imgur.com/UyDg2Nx.jpg[/img] Lighting looks good in remastered, but textures are really bad.[/QUOTE] his hair looks like it's made of plastic, and so does his skin the burnt part looks like rubber the cloths just kind of look overly textured who textured this shit [editline]22nd May 2016[/editline] I love how they lowered his tie for no reason at all
They messed up by comparing it to the PC on max specs. They should've compared it too the 360 or PS3 version in the video.
Is this is a joke? Except for the water effects it looks worse.
"Difference is, the cutscenes in the original were pre rendered I'm pretty sure the ones in remastered are real time•" A youtube comment, maybe that's why it's shitty.
[QUOTE=VietRooster2;50369297]According to a friend of mine most of these changes seem to be so that City/Asylum will match the aesthetic/colors of Knight, I guess. Most of these seem less like an "improvement" and more of an overall change in the look.[/QUOTE] i highly doubt that. a remaster like that is what you saw with metro, where they took last light models and put them into 2033.
Exclusive look at the new character creation process over at Warner Brothers Games. [img]http://i.imgur.com/VwrRYSF.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=J!NX;50365648][t]http://i.imgur.com/Os1a07T.png[/t] is this a joke[/QUOTE] I thought a major point of that cutscene was to show Bruce Wayne's face in Strange's glasses...
There should be a, universally decided upon, list of games that may have a remaster version developed. Next we'll be expecting Halo 3 remaster or BioShock remaster. The graphics are fine!
[QUOTE=Lunik;50376801]I thought a major point of that cutscene was to show Bruce Wayne's face in Strange's glasses...[/QUOTE] I feel like it also applies here [img]http://i.imgur.com/eec4JV7.png[/img] Seems like end on him was not just a random decision, seems weird that it is not visible in remake.
Can't wait till we get a Doom remaster next year oh guys maybe someone should remaster Fallout 4 I really hope they remaster Witcher 3, but instead of upgrading the graphics they make it look like witcher 1, and make it run at 15 to 50 fps while just standing in a single room.
If they really go with that cartoonish look then why not include Origins altogether? Whatever they are doing with Unreal Engine 4 is beyond me, instead of really pushing out its potential all they did was swap the textures with a more rubber look and call it a day. Porting to an engine is one thing, but calling it a remaster is a straight up lie. Until then I'll just consider this a port with "Origins" skin pack as a shitty attempt to make a quick buck since Arkham Knight's failure.
fucking yeesh at all of this When is this supposed to come out? God, I hope this is all really old footage if they're really trying to pass this off as a remaster Man, fuck Warner Brothers.
[QUOTE=rndgenerator;50377215]I feel like it also applies here [img]http://i.imgur.com/eec4JV7.png[/img] Seems like end on him was not just a random decision, seems weird that it is not visible in remake.[/QUOTE] It is there, its just too high, look at his back. It is also not the exact same frame.
My fucking sides, it looks worse in places than the original and it's pretty funny that the original still has the better framerate. What they should've done is compared it to the originals as run on the old gen consoles rather than a maxed out PC, unless they seriously thought it looked better because "our consoles are better than PC".
[QUOTE=GordonZombie;50377609]My fucking sides, it looks worse in places than the original and it's pretty funny that the original still has the better framerate. What they should've done is compared it to the originals as run on the old gen consoles rather than a maxed out PC, unless they seriously thought it looked better because "our consoles are better than PC".[/QUOTE] The video was done by a fan channel, the comparison wasn't released as an official video.
[QUOTE=xalener;50377546]fucking yeesh at all of this When is this supposed to come out? God, I hope this is all really old footage if they're really trying to pass this off as a remaster Man, fuck Warner Brothers.[/QUOTE] They've got two months. It's out July 29th. Or at least, that's the initial date. WB'll probably put it out, issue an apology, cancel digital editions, make it look worse, then re-release it three or four months down the line.
[QUOTE=Freakie;50365518]Is it just me or does the remaster look worse graphically, somehow?[/QUOTE] in some places yes, but overwhelmingly does most of the remaster look better than the original. the original had too much of that super-green light, almost looks like a fucking emergency room at times. while arkham is supposed to be an asylum, there is literally nothing in the art style that should suggest it be lit with those greenish halogens
Remember guys this is what happens when you give development of a remaster to another company. Fucking hell how do you fuck this up so bad. Only thing I can see coming out of this is the models for Harley, Catwoman, and Ivy being used for SFM porn. To add there is actually going to be people who are gonna defend this.
[QUOTE=no1dead;50378004]Remember guys this is what happens when you give development of a remaster to another company. Fucking hell how do you fuck this up so bad. Only thing I can see coming out of this is the [b]models for Harley, Catwoman, and Ivy being used for SFM porn.[/b] To add there is actually going to be people who are gonna defend this.[/QUOTE] Seems like reasons enough to defend this
Nice "remaster"....
[img]http://i.imgur.com/eBtzisx.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=DEMONSKUL;50378196]Nice "remaster"....[/QUOTE] More like "disaster" .. [sp]sorry[/sp]
[QUOTE=ThePanther;50376842]There should be a, universally decided upon, list of games that may have a remaster version developed. Next we'll be expecting Halo 3 remaster or BioShock remaster. The graphics are fine![/QUOTE] but both of those were already made
[QUOTE=DasMatze;50378479][img]http://i.imgur.com/eBtzisx.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]mmm good ol' ps1 graphics
No lie, I'd play that.
Who made this? FAKEFACTORY?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.