[QUOTE=DDex;18927148]What history shows isn't true communism.[/QUOTE]
All those other communist countries were just practice shots, this one is for real!
[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;18929982]Then they would tell you to capitalize and fart on you some more, Hamilton will shart a bit on your face.[/QUOTE]
no, no, I think that you are projecting your insecurities onto me, do you get farted on in school alot? You should talk to the counselors for that.
Fascist dictatorship, ruled by Garry Newman.
[QUOTE=lulzbocks;18930103]Fascist dictatorship, ruled by Garry Newman.[/QUOTE]
I'd hate to see April Fool's day. :geno:
The Concept of Communism
no government
no asshole cops:allears:
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;18930098]no, no, I think that you are projecting your insecurities onto me, do you get farted on in school alot? You should talk to the counselors for that.[/QUOTE]
I will go do that, stay here and be ignorant, brb.
[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;18930589]I will go do that, stay here and be ignorant, brb.[/QUOTE]
so long kid, remember to cry, that's bonus points to make them believe you.
There is no perfect form of government. They all have flaws.
And yes, that includes Communism. The idea that every everyone is equal is undermined by the fact that control and authority still need to be in place, meaning that ultimately power is still unevenly distributed to individuals who are open to corruption (see Josef Stalin).
I also don't except it when people say "but country X/person Y was not a true representation of Communism". Of course not, because the idea can never be properly implemented (this includes Capitalism). For a form of government to work it requires everyone involed to operate as properly, much like a part in a machine. If any one part fails or does not work correctly, the whole machine is broke. This is present in governments by people who are corrupt, power mad, etc... (again, see Josef Stalin). Thus the likelyhood of a government being formed with a particular ideology which is made up of men who are not all morally-impaired is next to nil and thus no form of government can ever be perfect, simply because it can't be properly implemented.
But seriously you're pretty stupid if you honestly believe you know how they would react. That's like saying Orwell would be a neo-Conservative if he was in this society. You couldn't possibly know because the times and issues are so different.
But whatever you can keep being a faggot.
[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;18930785]But seriously you're pretty stupid if you honestly believe you know how they would react. That's like saying Orwell would be a neo-Conservative if he was in this society. You couldn't possibly know because the times and issues are so different.
But whatever you can keep being a faggot.[/QUOTE]
dear god, they both fart on your face then call you a faggot?
it's okay, those guys are probably insecure of themselves so much, they have to call you everything much as possible to feel superior to you. Don't let the bullies take control of you, that's what they thrive on, ok?
but that doesn't mean you can go around and say the exact same stuff because of it. It's bad and hurts people feelings, I know you personally experienced being farted on and called a faggot, so you must realize how much it hurts to hear that from another person right?
Look at the type of government that Tribes, Indians, and various small groups of uncivilized people use. All they usually have is a sole leader, a council, and worship supernatural figures. They almost never have conflicts due to their beliefs. These people all pitch in to do their share to keep themselves living. Always devoting their time to assist each other and using no form of currency. They aren't influenced negatively by outside media and other nations. So they live in an almost perfect society. Due to them living is a small environment and a low population they can thrive.
So theoretically the only perfect government would work with a small group or else you must use control and power thus corruption. Humans in nature are not designed to get along after numbers increase. Ever notice how you and your best friend almost always get along when no one else is around, but when another person is put into the equation there are problems. Where it be an object or a girl, problems arise. So with a small civilization it will be perfect, but growth is inevitable.
Thus where religion comes in... As in the old testament in the bible people used to sacrifice each other to the gods decreasing the population. Men went hunting for food increasing the chance for someone to loose a life. Women were not able to bride until a ripe age and marry an older man to have a certain amount of children. So everything would stay at a set population, basically. Even though what I have just described sounds impossible it is happening all over the world as I type. Ever look at the bible? People used to follow a god because they were scared to do otherwise so a King could rule over a people with no corruption. Religion is the answer to a perfect government, due to the world becoming more atheist it is going to hell. I may sound like a crazy christian but look around it is the truth.
We must make people believe in a god so they fear it and follow it, to control people we must devise a god that cannot be proven wrong to control the weak and simple minded majority of humans. The smart wise minded will find flaws, and that's what everyone has done most religions are beginning to fail as we become more educated. So should we keep people stupid as we grow or decrease the population, that is the question.
A completely and utterly Laissez-faire type of government which is really a collection of super corporations pooling resources together to protect the country from outside threats.
It works beautifully on Nationstates anyways :v:
[QUOTE=Enishi;18924185]Communism is the perfect government in my eyes.
However, the execution is impossible since it contradicts human nature.[/QUOTE]
It is the perfect government on paper and in theory but as you said, it's impossible because us (human nature as a whole etc).
Mine would be a bit like this one.
[QUOTE=evilking1;18924059]One you can trust to help you when you get in trouble (unemployment etc), but doesn't anally rape you if you make some money.[/QUOTE]
Things I would add would be:
Doesn't dictate how it's people should live and what they should do (ie Avoid being a nanny state)
I believe in the seperation of Hindus from Sikhs in India, and although a Sikh extremist concept, I think the country of Khalistan should be formed, although worries about it being a theoracy justified.
naw jk love dem hindus lolll
A very small government, big governments are shit/
ITT: People with very limited understandings of political (and Marxist) theory. QED: "Government gotta stop taking my money. Ron Paul 2012", "Dude, communism is good IN THEORY but not in practice", "Human nature bro".
The correct answer is either anarchy or a government that gives out free weed.
anarchy is impossible
[QUOTE=bnet;18932250][b]ITT: People with very limited understandings[/b] of political (and Marxist) theory. QED: "Government gotta stop taking my money. Ron Paul 2012", "Dude, communism is good IN THEORY but not in practice", "Human nature bro".
The correct answer is either anarchy or a government that gives out free weed.[/QUOTE]
[quote]
The correct answer is either anarchy or a government that gives out free weed.[/quote]
[quote]
answer is either anarchy or a government that gives out[/quote]
[quote]either anarchy or a government[/quote]
[quote][b]anarchy[/b][/quote]
Irony.
Communism done as it was conceptualized.
[QUOTE=Factory;18932324]Communism done as it was conceptualized.[/QUOTE]
Only possible if we upload our minds into computers and become robots.
[QUOTE=Factory;18932324]Communism done as it was conceptualized.[/QUOTE]
[img]http://img697.imageshack.us/img697/4387/heavyweaponsguyitsnotpo.jpg[/img]
EETS NOT POSSIBLE.
[QUOTE=Nautsabes;18931039]A completely and utterly Laissez-faire type of government which is really a collection of super corporations pooling resources together to protect the country from outside threats.
It works beautifully on Nationstates anyways :v:[/QUOTE]
Laissez-faire isn't very good if you wan't the economy to be based off more than just agriculture....
Facepunchism
Basically your idyllic democracy, where it seems as though the uncorrupted senators and representatives are able to get whatever they need done while the presidential elections are fun to watch and, in the end, the Presidents are apparently excellent people who get the job done.
In reality, a meritocratic shadow oligarchy controls the whole thing, based around the concept of helping the citizens of their country and her allies.
Basically, it would be all the advantages the illusion of freedom brings, with all the advantages of a totalitarian government.
One that knows when it's necessary to stay out of the fucking way.
Fascism!!!
Dave Mustainiasm
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umeZtszNShk[/media]
not really, i think after nuclear war, ill start a Anarchist society.
anarchy wurks i dun no what you talking about
[editline]07:51PM[/editline]
Mother fucker
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
