[QUOTE=Mio Akiyama;38297436]Vinyl has an uncompressed sound, while CD is compressed. Makes the sound on vinyl sound more clear than a cd which is compressed[/QUOTE]
I argue that the compression is so fine that it can't be noticed even on the most high end equipment
CDs are 1411 kb/s
average mp3 is 160 kb/s (highly compressed)
well they're obviously gonna be digitally remastered, making the entire box set pointless. :v:
and as for "the way the band intended it to be heard" = pure bollocks, half the albums weren't intended to be heard in stereo by the band.
any who, more money for them.
[editline]3rd November 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Mio Akiyama;38297436]Vinyl has an uncompressed sound[/QUOTE]
not when the music has been digitally remastered a thousand times lol
[editline]3rd November 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Barbarian887;38298335]
average mp3 is 160 kb/s [/QUOTE]
what?
[editline]3rd November 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Noss;38286426]$320 isn't a bad price if you're a fan.[/QUOTE]
i'm pretty certain you can find ALL the Beatles records on ebay for less than £100 if you look hard enough.
[QUOTE=Mio Akiyama;38297436]Vinyl has an uncompressed sound, while CD is compressed. Makes the sound on vinyl sound more clear than a cd which is compressed[/QUOTE]
"More clear" aka "differs only in things you:
a)can't even reproduce without $20k worth of audio equipment alone
b)90% of people genuinely can't hear, and only imagine they do"
Vinyls are cool and there's a small collection right here behind me, but arguing they offer actual quality advantage for common listener is not just wrong, but stupid.
On top of that, the medium [I]does[/I] inherently decrease in quality after each and every play. That's physics. You can say that it's negligible, well, then I say the disadvantages of CDs (or FLAC as fuck practical use of physical media altogether) are negligible, too.
By the way, CD isn't compressed at all, it's [I]encoded[/I], that's something else. MP3s are compressed. FLAC is encoded and uncompressed, too.
you either prefer the sound of vinyl or you prefer the sound of digital.
there's no objectivity, the video is crap, beatles need less attention, stop complaining and kick back and relax with some soul. [img]http://forums.njpinebarrens.com/styles/njpb/smiles/emot-smug.gif[/img]
[editline]3rd November 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;38300353]
On top of that, the medium [I]does[/I] inherently decrease in quality after each and every play. [/QUOTE]
depends on quality of stylus and vinyl pressing.
audible decrease in quality occurs after 50-100 plays for your information so that's wrong what you said.
if you want to "back up" your vinyl sound, get a high end soundcard and record them at 24bit so you can archive them. They can inevitably sound better than a CD version sometimes.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;38300353]
b)90% of people genuinely can't hear, and only imagine they do".[/QUOTE]
don't rate dumb and say this with NO basis for your statements..
Let this be said that I enjoy the sound of vinyl more than I do than that of CDs or Mp3s
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.