• Samsung 3D LED TV A new dimension in TV is here
    45 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Dlaor;21799318]No, this is 1D:[/QUOTE] No, he's right. 1D is a straight line.
Eh, Avatar was not the first movie to use 3D at all :colbert:
[QUOTE=BmB;21801781]No, he's right. 1D is a straight line.[/QUOTE] Yes, but not like the line he posted. The line will be so thin you won't see it.
[QUOTE=leontodd;21799216]We should focus on exploring 1D instead of 3D [IMG]http://localhostr.com/files/a428cc/capture.png[/IMG] How exciting![/QUOTE] That's 4d I think.
[QUOTE=Kenneth;21792889]It wont work like it does in the ad, it uses shutter glasses. You can see the flicker and the effect only works if youre within 5 feet of the screen. It was still pretty cool though, and it can only get better[/QUOTE] Bullshit, you can watch it from any distance, and the flicker is not visible at 120 Hz. [editline]08:54AM[/editline] [QUOTE=acds;21793424]Am I the only one [B]not wanting[/B] 3D? Also, what is so special with this TV that makes it cost 7000$? Aren't the requirements only 120Hz (and the right software/hardware, which doesn't cost that much)?[/QUOTE] I think 3D can do great things, but I agree about the outrageous cost. There's no reason what so ever for the high price, it just has to be able to display in 120 Hz [editline]08:55AM[/editline] [QUOTE=DarkWolf2;21793793]The human brain isn't calculated to process so much information for long periods of times. Hench migraines and other effects kick in when watching 3D for too long.[/QUOTE] Yeah, the human brain isn't made for two eyes. Wait. [editline]08:57AM[/editline] [QUOTE=leontodd;21799216]We should focus on exploring 1D instead of 3D [IMG]http://localhostr.com/files/a428cc/capture.png[/IMG] How exciting![/QUOTE] That's still 2D, you shouldn't be able to see 1D. [QUOTE=Dlaor;21799318]No, this is 1D:[/QUOTE] Correct.
not worth it, if you tilt your head the 3d affect is gone, and the prices for the glasses are like 200 bucks each.
[QUOTE=Yurgenst;21798738]Actually the ones that run at 120Hz require polarizing glasses to watch in 3D. Whats so impressive about this one is it doesn't need glasses.[/QUOTE] no, it does. the same glasses.
Uh well, who would want to see all the dumb trash on TV in 3D anyway? Its annoying enough in 2D. Nah, I realize we are talking about movies here rather than everyday television, but my opinion about it is: Wake me up when hologram stuff is here. Until then, I won't buy into this gimmicky 3D trend that they try to use to milk more dollars out of their boring crap. I would rather have better 2d movies than this crap, but Joe Average likes to pay thousands for the same dull junk but in a new gimmicky way to consume it.
[QUOTE=WOO v5;21829775]Bullshit, you can watch it from any distance, and the flicker is not visible at 120 Hz. [editline]08:54AM[/editline] I think 3D can do great things, but I agree about the outrageous cost. There's no reason what so ever for the high price, it just has to be able to display in 120 Hz [editline]08:55AM[/editline] Yeah, the human brain isn't made for two eyes. Wait. [editline]08:57AM[/editline] That's still 2D, you shouldn't be able to see 1D. Correct.[/QUOTE] 3D, base, height, depth. 2D, base, height. 1D, base. So technically, you can.
we should focus on 0D
This looks great, but it will carry a hefty price tag.
That's Argentina! I know those streets!! :v: I haven't seen or heard of a massive 3D LCDs wall on my city though.
[QUOTE=Dlaor;21802617]Yes, but not like the line he posted. The line will be so thin you won't see it.[/QUOTE] In other news, atoms don't look like coloured balls. Thank you for your insight.
[QUOTE=Orkel;21792863]Around 2,500 dollars apparently.[/QUOTE] Haha, Thats the price of a Normal LED TV.
[QUOTE=xxncxx;21838968]3D, base, height, depth. 2D, base, height. 1D, base. So technically, you can.[/QUOTE] If I can take a ruler and measure the height, even if it is .3 mm, (Which, according to my resolution, it is.) then it is 2D, as it has base and height.
[QUOTE=Johnnsen;21838548]Uh well, who would want to see all the dumb trash on TV in 3D anyway? Its annoying enough in 2D. Nah, I realize we are talking about movies here rather than everyday television, but my opinion about it is: Wake me up when hologram stuff is here. Until then, I won't buy into this gimmicky 3D trend that they try to use to milk more dollars out of their boring crap. I would rather have better 2d movies than this crap, but Joe Average likes to pay thousands for the same dull junk but in a new gimmicky way to consume it.[/QUOTE] And we have product lockdowns from Apple (And other Companies) To thank for that. All of our devices are starting to quickly shift from becoming productive all-around machines into mass-consumption devices.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.