[QUOTE=Dlaor;21799318]No, this is 1D:[/QUOTE]
No, he's right. 1D is a straight line.
Eh, Avatar was not the first movie to use 3D at all :colbert:
[QUOTE=BmB;21801781]No, he's right. 1D is a straight line.[/QUOTE]
Yes, but not like the line he posted. The line will be so thin you won't see it.
[QUOTE=leontodd;21799216]We should focus on exploring 1D instead of 3D
[IMG]http://localhostr.com/files/a428cc/capture.png[/IMG]
How exciting![/QUOTE]
That's 4d I think.
[QUOTE=Kenneth;21792889]It wont work like it does in the ad, it uses shutter glasses. You can see the flicker and the effect only works if youre within 5 feet of the screen. It was still pretty cool though, and it can only get better[/QUOTE]
Bullshit, you can watch it from any distance, and the flicker is not visible at 120 Hz.
[editline]08:54AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=acds;21793424]Am I the only one [B]not wanting[/B] 3D?
Also, what is so special with this TV that makes it cost 7000$? Aren't the requirements only 120Hz (and the right software/hardware, which doesn't cost that much)?[/QUOTE]
I think 3D can do great things, but I agree about the outrageous cost.
There's no reason what so ever for the high price, it just has to be able to display in 120 Hz
[editline]08:55AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=DarkWolf2;21793793]The human brain isn't calculated to process so much information for long periods of times. Hench migraines and other effects kick in when watching 3D for too long.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, the human brain isn't made for two eyes. Wait.
[editline]08:57AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=leontodd;21799216]We should focus on exploring 1D instead of 3D
[IMG]http://localhostr.com/files/a428cc/capture.png[/IMG]
How exciting![/QUOTE]
That's still 2D, you shouldn't be able to see 1D.
[QUOTE=Dlaor;21799318]No, this is 1D:[/QUOTE]
Correct.
not worth it, if you tilt your head the 3d affect is gone, and the prices for the glasses are like 200 bucks each.
[QUOTE=Yurgenst;21798738]Actually the ones that run at 120Hz require polarizing glasses to watch in 3D. Whats so impressive about this one is it doesn't need glasses.[/QUOTE]
no, it does. the same glasses.
Uh well, who would want to see all the dumb trash on TV in 3D anyway? Its annoying enough in 2D.
Nah, I realize we are talking about movies here rather than everyday television, but my opinion about it is: Wake me up when hologram stuff is here. Until then, I won't buy into this gimmicky 3D trend that they try to use to milk more dollars out of their boring crap.
I would rather have better 2d movies than this crap, but Joe Average likes to pay thousands for the same dull junk but in a new gimmicky way to consume it.
[QUOTE=WOO v5;21829775]Bullshit, you can watch it from any distance, and the flicker is not visible at 120 Hz.
[editline]08:54AM[/editline]
I think 3D can do great things, but I agree about the outrageous cost.
There's no reason what so ever for the high price, it just has to be able to display in 120 Hz
[editline]08:55AM[/editline]
Yeah, the human brain isn't made for two eyes. Wait.
[editline]08:57AM[/editline]
That's still 2D, you shouldn't be able to see 1D.
Correct.[/QUOTE]
3D, base, height, depth.
2D, base, height.
1D, base.
So technically, you can.
we should focus on 0D
This looks great, but it will carry a hefty price tag.
That's Argentina! I know those streets!! :v:
I haven't seen or heard of a massive 3D LCDs wall on my city though.
[QUOTE=Dlaor;21802617]Yes, but not like the line he posted. The line will be so thin you won't see it.[/QUOTE]
In other news, atoms don't look like coloured balls. Thank you for your insight.
[QUOTE=Orkel;21792863]Around 2,500 dollars apparently.[/QUOTE]
Haha, Thats the price of a Normal LED TV.
[QUOTE=xxncxx;21838968]3D, base, height, depth.
2D, base, height.
1D, base.
So technically, you can.[/QUOTE]
If I can take a ruler and measure the height, even if it is .3 mm, (Which, according to my resolution, it is.) then it is 2D, as it has base and height.
[QUOTE=Johnnsen;21838548]Uh well, who would want to see all the dumb trash on TV in 3D anyway? Its annoying enough in 2D.
Nah, I realize we are talking about movies here rather than everyday television, but my opinion about it is: Wake me up when hologram stuff is here. Until then, I won't buy into this gimmicky 3D trend that they try to use to milk more dollars out of their boring crap.
I would rather have better 2d movies than this crap, but Joe Average likes to pay thousands for the same dull junk but in a new gimmicky way to consume it.[/QUOTE]
And we have product lockdowns from Apple (And other Companies) To thank for that. All of our devices are starting to quickly shift from becoming productive all-around machines into mass-consumption devices.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.