[QUOTE=R3mix;25258595]Silly children. Let's actually open these links shall we?
- In philosophy, theory (from ancient Greek theoria, θεωρία, meaning "a looking at, viewing, beholding") refers to contemplation or speculation, as opposed to action
- While theories in the arts and philosophy may address ideas and not easily observable empirical phenomena, [B]in modern science the term "theory", or "scientific theory" is generally understood to refer to a proposed explanation of empirical phenomena.[/B]
- A hypothesis (from Greek ὑπόθεσις; plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenon.
Next time, open the link, and open your god damn eyes.
P.S: You haven't even proved me wrong on anything?[/QUOTE]
Generally a theory has to be accepted by many people to be a theory. What you said was a hypothesis. The Theory of evolution is an example of this. It's generally accepted throughout the scientific community that evolution is real, and it can be tested with similar results many times, therefore it's a theory. When you state something without doing any real testing or experimentation, it's a hypothesis.
[QUOTE=OvB;25258740]Generally a theory has to be accepted by many people to be a theory. What you said was a hypothesis. The Theory of evolution is an example of this. It's generally accepted throughout the scientific community that evolution is real, and it can be tested with similar results many times, therefore it's a theory. When you state something without doing any real testing or experimentation, it's a hypothesis.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory[/url]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothesis[/url]
Read up a couple posts, please.
^
|
|
|
Massive ownage
[QUOTE=R3mix;25258716][b]It's so obvious you're trying to cover up your ass and make you seem good.[/b]
[img]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20081017223922/uncyclopedia/images/f/f0/Facepalm.gif[/img][/QUOTE]
im sorry but were you born 2000 years ago, dont like basic logic or a troll of some sort because 1 of those 3 have to be true
[QUOTE=R3mix;25258332][I]We're all living inside some sort of system, no doubt. One reason can prove my theory on this, the universe is still expanding.
If we look at an atom, it splits over and over and over, sorta like the universe isn't it? The universe isn't exactly "splitting" but you get my point, it keeps expanding. [/I] [I]
As humans, if we look at the basic reactions we have, there is negative, neutral, or positive.[/I] [I]
Positive = Happy, Joy[/I] [I]
Negative = Sadness, Anger[/I] [I]
Neutral = Neutral[/I] [I]
Matter is everything, and since an atom is matter, we're made up of atoms. Different elements, etc. You get the point.[/I] - all this is irrelevant to the actual hypothesis.
[B]We're atoms, inside a bigger atom which eventually is going to end ( The universe will eventually stop expanding and collapse within itself ), because all atoms end up dying.-[I]proposed explanation without testing(Hypothesis)[/I]
[/B][/QUOTE]
:science:
I think, therefore I am.
As for the rest of you, I have no proof any of you exist.
[QUOTE=OvB;25258818]:science:[/QUOTE]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Crunch[/url]
Oh, I'm so sorry, let me just take this one little part out of here...
- Some [b]THEORIZE[/b] that the universe could collapse to the state where it began and then initiate another Big Bang, so in this way the universe would last forever, but would pass through phases of expansion (Big Bang) and contraction (Big Crunch).
Do you really want to keep going after being proven wrong TWICE in a day?
"We're basically here to shit and fuck. If you're job isn't helping people shit or fuck, then you can calm down."
[QUOTE=R3mix;25258595]Silly children. Let's actually open these links shall we?
- In philosophy, theory (from ancient Greek theoria, θεωρία, meaning "a looking at, viewing, beholding") refers to contemplation or speculation, as opposed to action
- While theories in the arts and philosophy may address ideas and not easily observable empirical phenomena, [b]in modern science the term "theory", or "scientific theory" is generally understood to refer to a proposed explanation of empirical phenomena.[/b]
- A hypothesis (from Greek ὑπόθεσις; plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenon.
Next time, open the link, and open your god damn eyes.
P.S: You haven't even proved me wrong on anything?[/QUOTE]
Well, fr one a theory needs a basis. You just spouted out nonsense. Atoms are composed of baryons (protons, neutrons, etc), baryons of quarks (up and down in every situation you'll ever encounter), and those composed of strings.
[QUOTE=Biotoxsin;25258932]Well, fr one a theory needs a basis. You just spouted out nonsense. Atoms are composed of baryons (protons, neutrons, etc), baryons of quarks (up and down in every situation you'll ever encounter), and those composed of strings.[/QUOTE]
Read all posts above yours.
From what I believe, everything is just perception. Maybe if you are in the Matrix, you may have a way out. But usually, the signs come to you. Trinity came to Neo. Spending your lifetime searching for "reality" isn't worth it. You have a frame of reference, and maybe it is useless in other topsy-turvy worlds, but within the laws of this world, it is all you got, and your best bet is to use it. You feel yourself, you see things, you hear things, you read. That is a damn good start. Keep in mind how lucky you are to have a conscience, with body of a dominant species in a viable planet. The chances of that happening is like...1/100000000000000(guessing). Take that to your advantage.
This also has something to do with the free will argument, but in the end, the conclusion wouldn't matter because it will be unresolved. What I'm trying to say is that you have to take some sort of leap in faith in believing in your own existence, because it is true that your frame of reference may just be a delusion. Your best bet is to believe in yourself, because so far, this path is more predictable than any other path, and you'll probably live a good life, too.
[QUOTE=R3mix;25258871][URL]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Crunch[/URL]
Oh, I'm so sorry, let me just take this one little part out of here...
- Some [B]THEORIZE[/B] that the universe could collapse to the state where it began and then initiate another Big Bang, so in this way the universe would last forever, but would pass through phases of expansion (Big Bang) and contraction (Big Crunch).
Do you really want to keep going after being proven wrong TWICE in a day?[/QUOTE]
What you claimed is a hypothesis no matter how you want to twist the word "Theory".
Hypothesis-
a[B] proposition[/B], or set of propositions, set forth [B]as an explanation for the occurrence[/B] of some [B]specified group of phenomena[/B], either[B] asserted merely as a provisional conjecture[/B] to guide investigation (working hypothesis) or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts.
2.[B]a proposition assumed as a premise in an argument. [/B]
3.the antecedent of a conditional proposition.
4.[B]a mere assumption or guess[/B].
In a scientific world, what you said was a hypothesis no matter how you put it. I don't care how people use the world Theory or it's forms, but no matter what, a theory has to be able to be tested multiple times with similar outcomes. You should know this if you graduated high school. Or even started high school for that matter.
[QUOTE=R3mix;25258948]Read all posts above yours.[/QUOTE]
thats different from you said, its like saying that cows are white and that i am made out of gold and because some of what you said was correct then you must be right
[QUOTE=OvB;25258982]What you claimed is a hypothesis no matter how you want to twist the word "Theory".
Hypothesis-
a[B] proposition[/B], or set of propositions, set forth [B]as an explanation for the occurrence[/B] of some [B]specified group of phenomena[/B], either[B] asserted merely as a provisional conjecture[/B] to guide investigation (working hypothesis) or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts.
2.[B]a proposition assumed as a premise in an argument. [/B]
3.the antecedent of a conditional proposition.
4.[B]a mere assumption or guess[/B].
In a scientific world, what you said was a hypothesis no matter how you put it. I don't care how people use the world Theory or it's forms, but no matter what, a theory has to be able to be tested multiple times with similar outcomes. You should know this if you graduated high school. Or even started high school for that matter.[/QUOTE]
Again, let's just re-quote this...
[QUOTE=R3mix;25258595]Silly children. Let's actually open these links shall we?
- In philosophy, theory (from ancient Greek theoria, θεωρία, meaning "a looking at, viewing, beholding") refers to contemplation or speculation, as opposed to action
- While theories in the arts and philosophy may address ideas and not easily observable empirical phenomena, [b]in modern science the term "theory", or "scientific theory" is generally understood to refer to a proposed explanation of empirical phenomena.[/b]
- A hypothesis (from Greek ὑπόθεσις; plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenon.[/QUOTE]
here is a good question, if you were destroyed but yet all the atoms that made you were put together would that person that was made be you?
[editline]02:23AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=R3mix;25259003]Again, let's just re-quote this...[/QUOTE]
exactly you just proved yourself wrong because what you first said was a guess
[QUOTE=imasillypiggys;25259015]here is a good question, if you were destroyed but yet all the atoms that made you were put together would that person that was made be you?[/QUOTE]
I think we heathen science folk call that being dead.
[QUOTE=imasillypiggys;25259015]here is a good question, if you were destroyed but yet all the atoms that made you were put together would that person that was made be you?
[editline]02:23AM[/editline]
exactly you just proved yourself wrong because what you first said was a guess[/QUOTE]
Does the pope shit in the woods?
I'm not going to answer a question that's completely off-topic to our argument ( and could lead into re-incarnation. )
And explain to me how I proved myself wrong? Please learn the English Language, you're obviously failing at it, massively.
[quote=r3mix;25259003]again, let's just re-quote this...[/quote]
[u][i][b]
hypothesis[/b][/i][/u]
Just don't think about it. You only live once, make this life count. Try to have as much fun as possible. Fuck many bitches, party with friends, go into a huge debt like everyone else and LIVE!!! Don't waste your time looking into the science and evolution bullshit on life. If evolution was true, how the fuck did we come from a rock?!
I'm done arguing with you. Go back to high school.
[QUOTE=ThatHippyMan;25259035]I think we heathen science folk call that being dead.[/QUOTE]
even if someone made out of the same atoms or even the same exact atoms that were in your body were made of you right before you died with the exact same thoughts and memories
[QUOTE=OvB;25259091][u][i][b]
hypothesis[/b][/i][/u][/QUOTE]
[u][i][b]Theory[/b][/i][/u]
We could sit here and argue all day over the definition of a word, but I'm not really going to, I've proved my side, you've proven yours, and there's obviously no conclusive agreement, so yeah.
[QUOTE=R3mix;25259039]Does the pope shit in the woods?
I'm not going to answer a question that's completely off-topic to our argument ( and could lead into re-incarnation. )
And explain to me how I proved myself wrong? Please learn the English Language, you're obviously failing at it, massively.[/QUOTE]
you havent proved a thing and all you do is say how stupid the other guy is and that isnt an argument
edit
that question wasnt directed to you
[QUOTE=imasillypiggys;25259105]even if someone made out of the same atoms or even the same exact atoms that were in your body were made of you right before you died with the exact same thoughts and memories[/QUOTE]
In that case, what does that have to do with the subject at hand?
[QUOTE=R3mix;25259123][U][I][B]Theory[/B][/I][/U]
We could sit here and argue all day over the definition of a word, but I'm not really going to, I've proved my side, you've proven yours, and there's obviously no conclusive agreement, so yeah.[/QUOTE]
Agree to disagree.
Oh, I see. You're a troll.
Carry on.
(@imasillypiggys)
[QUOTE=ThatHippyMan;25259155]In that case, what does that have to do with the subject at hand?[/QUOTE]
the op told us to talk about are questions and thoughts so i am
Well, there goes my automerge
[editline]09:29PM[/editline]
Again.
Jesus.
You people are posting like rabid animals.
[QUOTE=imasillypiggys;25259105]even if someone made out of the same atoms or even the same exact atoms that were in your body were made of you right before you died with the exact same thoughts and memories[/QUOTE]
I'm not quite sure what you're trying to say.
[QUOTE=imasillypiggys;25259127]you havent proved a thing and all you do is say how stupid the other guy is and that isnt an argument[/QUOTE]
I provided links, definitions, facts, and proof. Yet you somehow idiotically and blindly deny it all, and ignore it. Yet you come back with your argument with terrible grammar and english skills. You wouldn't stand a minute in a real debate.
You* haven't* isn't* and remember your periods, please.
[editline]10:30PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=OvB;25259160]Agree to disagree.[/QUOTE]
Sounds fine to me. :P
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.