• Squids Evade 3 Star Wanted Level in LA
    43 replies, posted
Stupid, dangerous, wrong, narcissistic, idiotic, selfish, dumb, retarded, life-threatening but man do I want to do that at least once in my life.
[QUOTE=Ricool06;46571806]With any luck they'll become road crayons and stop endangering innocent lives. You have to have the attitude of a 10 year old to do this.[/QUOTE] First time I've seen someone put it that way, road crayons.
[QUOTE=Pr0fane;46572318]. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5NjtAY8rSQ&t=0m48s[/media] [/QUOTE] Fuck that makes me angry, yeah ok lets gang and brake check a suv in our bikes.
[QUOTE=loopoo;46576271]First time I've seen someone put it that way, road crayons.[/QUOTE] We call them organ donors
[QUOTE=chunkymonkey;46576217][B]These types of people should be flogged and have their hands and feet broken, and their eyes poked out.[/B] That way they wouldn't be able to drive like fuck heads and endanger everyone else on the road. God damn fucking prats.[/QUOTE] I know this is the internet and all, but what the fuck is wrong with you.
[QUOTE=chunkymonkey;46576217][B]These types of people should be flogged and have their hands and feet broken, and their eyes poked out.[/B] That way they wouldn't be able to drive like fuck heads and endanger everyone else on the road. God damn fucking prats.[/QUOTE] wtf
[QUOTE=Crash155;46576840]wtf[/QUOTE] Aye, and then we'll do the same thing to their families and friends, for [i]daring[/i] to let them drive a motorbike irresponsibly! And then we'll post about it on Facepunch!
[QUOTE=Krinkels;46576098]He's not necessarily affirming the consequent. Note that he used an equals sign, which is symmetric. [/QUOTE] You expanded his point, and yours may hold water; but his is read like this: [quote]1. People with low IQ => un or undereducated and/or problems with authority. 2. These bikers => problems with authority. 3 Therefore these bikers => people with low IQ.[/quote] That's how his logic is flowing, he is affirming the consequent. 1 alone is fallacious because he is saying only people have problems with authority, which would need to be proven (and can be shown not to be in any event). And if you change 1 to be open ended "People with low IQ may be uneducated and have problems with authority" then 3 is a fallacy because these bikers could be high IQ and still have problems with authority.
Yeah Im tired of this. It's mighty clear what I mean. These people are clearly not very intelligent or at least don't act like it, they do have problems with authority and I wish there was a way where I could snip my fingers and this entire mentality would dissapear of the face of the earth. I have no idea why we are even talking about why they're behaving like they are behaving, because it's completely irrelevant. This is just a wrong way to conduct yourself, full stop.
huh I was expecting someone playing next-gen GTA 5 and escaping from a 3 star wanted level after eating a squid peyote plant or something.
[QUOTE=counterpo0;46576566]Fuck that makes me angry, yeah ok lets gang and brake check a suv in our bikes.[/QUOTE] If that shit happened to me I'd seriously just go full mental on their bikes. As wrong as it is, these fuckers deserve it.
I came into this thread expecting Cephalopods. Severely disappointing.
[QUOTE=glitchvid;46575708]Holy shit, this is textbook logical fallacy. [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent]Affirming the consequent[/url]:[/QUOTE] The zing is strong with this one.
[QUOTE=ChestyMcGee;46572108] but good job showing how terribly insecure you are by wagering that they have a low IQ lmao you're as pathetic and childish as them, just in a different way[/QUOTE] implying that some nerd posting an opinion about how dumb these cunts in the video are is anywhere near as ''pathetic and childish'' as gangsters roaming the streets on bikes looking for trouble.. fucking lmao dude
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.