• Is the fact the, "child porn is illegal" unconstitutional?
    264 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Caffeinated;16936992]I know this is from earlier in the thread, but So, say I had a friend (under 18) who wants to record him and his girlfriend (also under 18) having sex. She's agreed to it, but is his possession of that video illegal?[/QUOTE] Possession is only illegal if you aren't in the proxy age. Distribution in any form is illegal regardless.
.
And remember, not all states have a proxy age.
[QUOTE=Lankist;16937054]And remember, not all states have a proxy age.[/QUOTE] Oh, I should've mentioned that I'm in Canada, sorry.
[QUOTE=Caffeinated;16937081]Oh, I should've mentioned that I'm in Canada, sorry.[/QUOTE] Yeah I'm just talking Stateside here. I don't know the Canadian laws.
[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;16932744]Buck the Fible.[/QUOTE] I lol'd
Guy, this isn't Derkaderkastan, I very highly doubt the government is going to rule topless women or CP legal. [editline]02:45AM[/editline] Tip: Feminism does not preach equality. Not anymore at least. [editline]02:46AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Vainglory;16936925]There's a difference between nudity and indecency. sexual acts in public is, and always should be illegal. anyway, until 18 or 21, your parents would be in charge of how much clothing you wear, so it would be up to their discretion.[/QUOTE] Billy, run around naked outside so the other children can laugh at your tiny penis.
[QUOTE=DemonDog;16932181]I say let them be topless. and pantless. :smug:[/QUOTE] How did this get 37 agrees?
[QUOTE=Malumbre;16936964]Why?[/QUOTE] How would you like it if you walked outside and two random people were fucking on your front lawn? You wouldn't like it. And don't say you would, because you would be a liar.
[QUOTE=ColinSSX;16938115]How did this get 37 agrees?[/QUOTE] It's the internet; he wasn't being totally serious. [editline]02:50AM[/editline] ITT: Ultra-liberals think that fucking in public should be legal. I don't think they'll be satisfied until soceity crumbles at our feet and people must carve a living out of scavenging the nuclear wasteland.
[QUOTE=Wangman;16938145]It's the internet; he wasn't being totally serious.[/QUOTE] I'd expect it to get funny or dumb ratings if anything.
[QUOTE=ColinSSX;16938155]I'd expect it to get funny or dumb ratings if anything.[/QUOTE] Ratings on Facepunch are interchangeable.
[QUOTE=ColinSSX;16938155]I'd expect it to get funny or dumb ratings if anything.[/QUOTE] I've seen people rate box for extremely intelligent posts.
[QUOTE=Wangman;16938096]Tip: Feminism does not preach equality. Not anymore at least.[/QUOTE] He's so cute pretending to be knowledgeable about politics
[QUOTE=Banned?;16938135]How would you like it if you walked outside and two random people were fucking on your front lawn? You wouldn't like it. And don't say you would, because you would be a liar.[/QUOTE] Well you never said anything about trespassing. You said out in public, as in outside, not necessarily on my front lawn. And depending on how the couple looked physically, I may or may not object. But why do I or anything else find it offensive? It's because people pushed to have that idea put in our heads, to be ashamed of our bodies and to hide it out of "decency." I was born into this world without clothing on, animals fuck in the wild all the time, we're animals just the same, at the very least, why should nudity be indecent? Also, who cares about ratings? They're pointless, especially since they're no longer accumulated.
I don't get it. I understand that this thread is about child-porn, but uh... what is there to talk about other then it being illegal? Also, did someone [i]seriously[/i] suggest that it's child porn to have two kids kiss? Even if the young female happens to be top-less, I don't think it'd be 'child porn.' Because I don't think kissing is sexual. At all. But that's just me. I'm probably going to get a box too live, too.
[QUOTE=TH89;16938200]He's so cute pretending to be knowledgeable about politics[/QUOTE] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tRwFaHkdGU[/media] *cough* At least explain your post instead of just insulting me.
[QUOTE=Silversoda;16938249]I don't get it. I understand that this thread is about child-porn, but uh... what is there to talk about other then it being illegal? Also, did someone [i]seriously[/i] suggest that it's child porn to have two kids kiss? Even if the young female happens to be top-less, I don't think it'd be 'child porn.' Because I don't think kissing is sexual. At all. But that's just me. I'm probably going to get a box too live, too.[/QUOTE] Kissing is sexual, unless it's a peck on the cheek or something, or one of those European greetings or some other cultural thing.
[QUOTE=Malumbre;16938274]Kissing is sexual, unless it's a peck on the cheek or something, or one of those European greetings or some other cultural thing.[/QUOTE] Hrm. I never thought of it as sexual, unless it directly led to making out or sex, honestly. Well, whatever.
Should this not be two separate topics and threads? Because the title is misleading I thought this was about child pornographic and laws with a focus on the philosophical ideal of freedom regarding it. Like how they use the cover of art to get away with pictures/ footage which is clearly enjoyed by people who like children. Then there is the separate topic of should women be allowed to be topless in public.
[QUOTE=OutOfPop;16936875]Women are stupid, hahahahahaha (Sorry, I couldn't hold it in). Tits are sexual organs, that is the only reason why they aren't supposed to be shown and flopping about. This is a stupid religious idea anyways (The idea that sexual organs are not to be seen outside the bedroom). Don't people let there babies walk around naked/no top on all the time? I know they aren't developed, but it's still classified as underage and there-for would be illegal. I think 90% of the girls in NA don't want to walk around with there tits out anyways.[/QUOTE] Tits aren't really sexual organs, they're not used to reproduce. (Except for breastfeeding) They're only banned because an overwhelming amount of guys find them arousing. Shit, there's people that find feet attractive, but it's not illegal to be barefoot.
[QUOTE=FunnyBunny;16938481]Tits aren't really sexual organs, they're not used to reproduce. (Except for breastfeeding) They're only banned because an overwhelming amount of guys find them arousing. Shit, there's people that find feet attractive, but it's not illegal to be barefoot.[/QUOTE] That is honestly the most retarded argument I've ever heard, ever. The 'majority' of guys means almost every single heterosexual male on the planet. From this logic men should be allowed to walk around without pants. On topic, I think they should be allowed to do what they want. If you want to walk around literally half naked, go ahead, just don't complain when I call you a retarded whore.
being topless in public is illegal because society is dumb "titties on a female are disgusting and should be covered at all times!! only man titties allowed!"
[QUOTE=abigserve;16938753]That is honestly the most retarded argument I've ever heard, ever. The 'majority' of guys means almost every single heterosexual male on the planet.[/QUOTE] men in topless societies of africa don't get a boner every time they see boobs men in nudist colonies don't get a boner every time they see boobs (you get kicked out for getting a boner) I mean come on, really they're more arousing in cultures where we're used to covering them up all the time because we associate taking top off with having sex
If you think nudity is child pornography you obviously haven't read up much law.
[QUOTE=tarkio;16938910]men in nudist colonies don't get a boner every time they see boobs (you get kicked out for getting a boner)[/QUOTE] Really? That's kind of bizarre. Wtf.
If I was in a nudist colony I'd be too frightened by all the butch men to get a boner.
[QUOTE=Malumbre;16939075]Really? That's kind of bizarre. Wtf.[/QUOTE] It's a strict separation of nudity and sex. Sex is respected as a private act between two people. Nudity is seen as natural, not arousing. It's quite fascinating. (I assume that since nudity alone does not arouse the men, foreplay lends a bigger role to male arousal. And foreplay is always done in private.)
[QUOTE=Zeke129;16932176]Laws are supposed to reflect the general morality of the community. The community is against child porn (rightfully so). So what does it matter? CP is and should be illegal. Easy as that.[/QUOTE] Your kind of thinking is what makes it legal to beat your wife in Afganistan
[QUOTE=Karskin;16939334]Your kind of thinking is what makes it legal to beat your wife in Afganistan[/QUOTE] Don't forget in Saudi Arabia, we can stone our wives because it's morally right ! :eng101: (Oh yeah and the law) [editline]10:34AM[/editline] Humanity is way too prude for it's own good. You should all read Brave New World.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.