[QUOTE=Repulse`;36862387]Maybe I like my hair short instead of looking like some shit head. I would talk shit on you for the foolish part, but I'm gonna play it cool.[/QUOTE]
Sorry for that, I didn't mean to offend you. I was refering to Boreale Cast. WH40k humor.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XFwA0YQsPI&feature=relmfu[/media]
circa 1:40
If you're not into that stuff, they're all basically making fun of one character from the game, named Indrick Boreale (who is bald), known for hilariously horrible voice acting. In one of his lines he says "Bold and foolish", wich sorta evolved into "Bald and foolish".
Lookie what came today c:
[img]http://filesmelt.com/dl/photo_211.jpg[/img]
Moar pictures with slide fitted soon
does it have built in explosives to simulate a case head failure?
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;36879533]does it have built in explosives to simulate a case head failure?[/QUOTE]
I think you missed the part where it says "9x19"
That only happens on the .40s
I think you missed the part where you aren't supposed to ruin good jokes
[editline]22nd July 2012[/editline]
also it's only the first gen .40s
my gen 1 22 hasn't done it yet though so I'm not sure if these people were just using shit brass or what
The problem was with the first batch of recoil springs. They weren't strong enough to bring the slide back to battery completely.
Also it never really was a problem except with the low grain ammo.
Like how the Gen4 19s have problems cycling the 115gr. ammo
no it wasn't
it was the feed ramps, there was a portion of cartridge left unsupported in the chamber. you're talking about cycling problems, not exploding problems
They also suffered from case failures due to failure to cycle though.
I've never seen any example of a .40 caliber glock (or any gun for that matter) having a catastrophic failure due to cycling issues. it was the feed ramp in gen1 glock 22s, because they were built on 9x19 frames with a different barrel and extractor and almost no other differences
It's more commonly seen on bottlenecked cartridges. Basically what happens is that the action closes like 98% of the way, then goes off, resulting in a case failure.
I'm under the impression that that was also an issue with the Gen1 G22s, as they also commonly had failure to feed issues
bro do you not know what bottlenecked cartridges are or what because there's no such thing as a bottlenecked .40S&W
I am aware that .40s&w is not bottlenecked. I was saying that failure to feed case failures were more common with bottlenecked cartridges.
It's partly why (with the exception of .357Sig) there are virtually no handguns chambered for a bottlenecked round
just off the top of my head 5.7x28, 7.62x25, 7.63 Mauser, .22 rem jet, .256 win mag, .25NAA, .32NAA, .400 Cor-Bon, .440 Cor-Bon, 7.65 Luger, .357/44, 7x20 Nambu, 6.5 Bergmann, 5.8x21, .221 Rem Fireball, 8.5 Mars, etc.
there are a ton of bottlenecked handgun rounds and there are absolutely no problems with using bottlenecked cartridges in a pistol., the reason stuff like 9x19, 10mm Auto, .45ACP, etc. are more common is because the school of thought behind handgun users is heavy and slow bullet for maximum stopping power and minimum over-penetration
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;36880249]just off the top of my head 5.7x28, 7.62x25, 7.63 Mauser, .22 rem jet, .256 win mag, .25NAA, .32NAA, .400 Cor-Bon, .440 Cor-Bon, 7.65 Luger, .357/44, 7x20 Nambu, 6.5 Bergmann, 5.8x21, .221 Rem Fireball, 8.5 Mars, etc.
there are a ton of bottlenecked handgun rounds and there are absolutely no problems with using bottlenecked cartridges in a pistol., the reason stuff like 9x19, 10mm Auto, .45ACP, etc. are more common is because the school of thought behind handgun users is heavy and slow bullet for maximum stopping power and minimum over-penetration[/QUOTE]
Jesus Christ this is like battle of the gun guru olympians
I don't even know what's going on
best pageking
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;36880249]just off the top of my head 5.7x28, 7.62x25, 7.63 Mauser, .22 rem jet, .256 win mag, .25NAA, .32NAA, .400 Cor-Bon, .440 Cor-Bon, 7.65 Luger, .357/44, 7x20 Nambu, 6.5 Bergmann, 5.8x21, .221 Rem Fireball, 8.5 Mars, etc.
there are a ton of bottlenecked handgun rounds and there are absolutely no problems with using bottlenecked cartridges in a pistol., the reason stuff like 9x19, 10mm Auto, .45ACP, etc. are more common is because the school of thought behind handgun users is heavy and slow bullet for maximum stopping power and minimum over-penetration[/QUOTE]
Okay, and all but like 5 of those are obsolete.
[editline]22nd July 2012[/editline]
Sorry I don't live up to your ~[I]superior elite handgun knowledge expertise[/I]~
Fucks sake.
only 4 are out of production (not including .357/44 because that's a wildcat) I don't know what you're smoking
How about: 50-70
We buy that up at every gun show.
Obsolete =/= out of production
still in production != not obsolete
[editline]21st July 2012[/editline]
well, fuck
only 6 haven't had new guns or conversion kits released for them in the past 15 or so years (again not counting .357/44 because it's still a wildcat and I don't know of any gun to ever use it other than some Desert Eagle prototypes)
Yeah, and? Companies still make rifles chambered in .30-06 and 8mm Mauser, and they're both obsolete with the advent of the .308 and derivatives.
As venom worded it, still in production =/= not obsolete
[QUOTE=felix the cat;36880688]Yeah, and? Companies still make rifles chambered in .30-06 and 8mm Mauser, and they're both obsolete with the advent of the .308 and derivatives.
As venom worded it, still in production =/= not obsolete[/QUOTE]
.30-06 and 8mm mauser are both considerably more powerful than .308 and ballistically not in the same class.
How do you figure that, when the .308 is ballistically in between the .30-06 and the 8mm?
Hey felix buy my mauser
.....
pics?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
