RDJ reportedly joined Captain America 3 cast for Civil War based plot.
I think that plotline should be saved for an Avengers film, but honestly, it would make sense to do it in an unrelated movie and save Avengers 3 for Thanos and the Infinity Gauntlet.
[editline]14th October 2014[/editline]
Also, do you have a source for that?
[QUOTE=The_J_Hat;46227340]
Also, do you have a source for that?[/QUOTE]
[url]http://variety.com/2014/film/news/robert-downey-jr-to-join-captain-america-3-exclusive-1201312229/[/url]
They could set up the Civil War on Cap 3, which leads directly into Avengers 3.
The sides could be picked during Cap 3, the actual fight during Avengers 3, Thanos coming in while the Avengers are battling, and then if they do make it into two parts, they have to team up to fight Thanos again.
[QUOTE=usaokay;46227656]Where will the series go next once Thanos is defeated though[/QUOTE]
Galactus? Make him the big purple motherfucker and not some faggoty cloud.
[QUOTE=Pops;46227727]Galactus? Make him the big purple motherfucker and not some faggoty cloud.[/QUOTE]
That's Fox.
Perhaps he doesn't get actually defeated, but instead he just tests the avengers.
or he comes back like Loki has...
Idk, they've been hyping Thanos up for SO long I feel like they should do the civil war after Thanos.
But the thing I want more than Thanos and Civil War, is the Doctor Strange movie.
[QUOTE=Zuimzado;46227733]That's Fox.[/QUOTE]
fox owns mutants
avengers 2 is having quicksilver and scarlet witch
galactus could be another destroyer-type thing, easy ways to write around it.
[QUOTE=Pops;46227856]fox owns mutants
avengers 2 is having quicksilver and scarlet witch
galactus could be another destroyer-type thing, easy ways to write around it.[/QUOTE]
Yeah but that only happened because of a technicality in that Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch are as much Avengers as they are mutants.
Also Fox owns the Fantastic Four, Silver Surfer and Galactus.
[QUOTE=Zuimzado;46227946]Yeah but that only happened because of a technicality in that Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch are as much Avengers as they are mutants.
Also Fox owns the Fantastic Four, Silver Surfer and Galactus.[/QUOTE]
the F4 are in new york as much as the avengers
could still happen
[QUOTE=Pops;46227967]the F4 are in new york as much as the avengers
could still happen[/QUOTE]
No, it couldn't.
The reason why Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch slipped through is that not only are they not [I]that[/I] famous, it also took one year for them to get to the Avengers, which is where they got most of their development.
Galactus first appearance is one of the most iconic Fantastic Four stories. Not only that, but said story is also one of the most iconic comic stories of that era. Also, although he has appeared in other stories with other Marvel heroes, he is always closely associated with the Fantastic Four, unlike Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver, who have both appeared more as Avengers than members of the Brotherhood of Evil Mutants.
So I came up with a rough idea for how a Civil War/Spider-Man introduction movie could work out:
[URL=http://s1189.photobucket.com/user/BanthaFodder95/media/MarvelStudiosplz_zps307141e7.png.html][IMG]http://i1189.photobucket.com/albums/z424/BanthaFodder95/MarvelStudiosplz_zps307141e7.png[/IMG][/URL]
[QUOTE=BanthaFodder;46228199]So I came up with a rough idea for how a Civil War/Spider-Man introduction movie could work out:
[URL=http://s1189.photobucket.com/user/BanthaFodder95/media/MarvelStudiosplz_zps307141e7.png.html][IMG]http://i1189.photobucket.com/albums/z424/BanthaFodder95/MarvelStudiosplz_zps307141e7.png[/IMG][/URL][/QUOTE]
It went from Civil War to Spiderman 4 plot :v:
Civil War is one of my all time favorite Marvel stories but I just don't quite see how they can pull it off without so many different characters, even with Strange and Antman coming up soon.
I don't think it's the Civil War we think it will be. But we'll see how Avengers 2 ends
[QUOTE=Rong;46228222]Oh wow, it's really happening!
[url]http://badassdigest.com/2014/10/13/robert-downey-jr-bringing-civil-war-to-captain-america-3/[/url] has always got additional details[/QUOTE]
This part is slightly upsetting since I like Captain America to be about mainly Captain America:
"More than that, Marvel is looking at Cap 3 as Avengers 2.5. It's going to be another ensemble picture"
[QUOTE=Rong;46228245]I don't think it's the Civil War we think it will be. But we'll see how Avengers 2 ends[/QUOTE]
I imagine it will start up roughly the same way with some sort of registration act. Iron Man will support it, but Cap will stand up for Truth, Justice, and the American Way, and see it as a rights violation. They'll divide (due to some events from Avengers 2, no doubt), scrap, but eventually find out that Tony's been brainwashed by Hydra/MODOK, Cap frees him, and then both of them beat the shit out of HYDRA/MODOK.
I'm really excited another Captain America movie is getting the "game changer" in the Marvel Universe.
The Winter Soldier was amazing, and now part three sounds even more amazing. I'm hoping Cap doesn't die as I feel like the audience has connected with him already, and I don't think someone else taking the name will go over to well to begin with. Maybe once they build another character more, but Bucky hasn't really been seen.
I think sony is realizing that they aren't getting the spiderman formula correct. Andrew Garfield as spiderman is spot on, but the way they are going with the story, it could use some work. Negotiating a deal with marvel where they could use Spider-man in the civil war/Thanos storyline could bring new life to the spider-man franchise while they build upon the sinister six/venom movies. Once spiderman does come back (which after the marvel team up, more people should be anticipating) they could really do something good. Maybe have a marvel character come with spiderman to fight the sinister six.
But this news is great.
also stealing this picture from another thread because it looked cool.
[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BzodVceIgAA3N_S.jpg:large[/img]
I think if Cap & Iron Man sets up Civil War then we will get a Civil War movie seperate from Avengers 3.
Ant Man and Dr Strange could show the effects of the Civil War during their own stories. Then have the Civil War movie. I wouldn't be surprised if by the time we get to Avengers 3 we have Steve Rogers out of the picture and the Avengers team struggling to battle Thanos without a leader.
Didn't the Russo brothers say they wanted people like Wolverine and Spiderman in Cap 3. Suddenly it becomes clear where Spiderman can appear. Cap 3 post credits go wild.
For Cap 3 to start setting up Civil War doesn't something need to happen in Avengers 2 to cause the public to backlash against the super heroes? I'm willing to bet Hulk goes crazy and destroys half a city and The Avengers have to launch him into space.
There was that rumor going around that Avengers 3 could be split into two movies, and this could definitely fit the rumor. First movie is about the Avengers fighting each other. Then Thanos comes in and second movie is about them putting their differences together and fighting against him with the help of the Guardians.
I gotta say, this is a smart move by Marvel, especially when you consider the other big movie coming out that year. DC already moved their date because they were afraid [I]Batman and Superman[/I] would do badly against [I]Captain America[/I] (just repeat that phrase in your head, we live in a world where movie execs are afraid the two biggest names in superheroing will flop against captain fucking america), so if they throw Iron Man- one of the most popular heroes of recent years- into the mix, we could have a real fight in the box office.
[QUOTE=usaokay;46228902]I'm going to be mad if Bucky takes over Steve Rogers's role if he ever gets assassinated by Crossbones.[/QUOTE]
And get Bucky's own ugly version of the suit.
I doubt they'll kill of Cap that easily. If anything, it'll be in a heroic display during Avengers 3. Speaking of which, I rather hope it isn't a two part movie. I'm starting to get really sick of them. Sure, it's a smart idea, but most two parters have shitty, unresolved endings, imo.
[quote]-Variety reported that Robert Downy Junior would appear in Captain America 3 as Iron Man, and that he had been scheduled for a small part but them bumped up his on screen time and would be receiving 40 million dollars for the part.
They then went on to say that this would be the kick off for Civil War.
-Newsarama and Comic Book Resources then reported that the official title of Cap 3 would be “Captain America 3: Civil War.”
-The entire internet then freaked the fudge out.
-This continued for about eight hours.
-Someone finally calmed down enough to look over the articles and realized “Wait a minute… they didn’t quote a single source about this story, and even if they did, they never once said Cap 3 would be Civil War, they said it set up Civil War, as in it’s possible that this could be what happens, never once saying it’s actually happening.”
-Then people went further back and found a month ago the Russo’s, the directors of Cap 2 and Cap 3, had come out and said, “Yeah there is no way Civil War is going to happen, it wouldn’t work.”
-Now we’re here in the present, taking a big sigh of relief, realizing we all freaked out over nothing, grabbing a cold pint, and waiting for all this to blow over.[/quote]
yeah i'm pretty sure this is the same guy who whipped up that shooped list of mcu titles
[QUOTE=The_J_Hat;46233705]I doubt they'll kill of Cap that easily. If anything, it'll be in a heroic display during Avengers 3. Speaking of which, I rather hope it isn't a two part movie. I'm starting to get really sick of them. Sure, it's a smart idea, but most two parters have shitty, unresolved endings, imo.[/QUOTE]
If they kill Cap, they [I]have[/I] to develop the Winter Soldier into a developed, trustworthy hero in order to take up the mantle beforehand.
And if they do kill Cap, I can see it as being a cliffhanger ending.
[editline]14th October 2014[/editline]
Also would like to see Winter Soldier beat the shit out of Ironman like he did in the comic :v:
[QUOTE=Katatonic717;46234276]stuff[/QUOTE]
While all that is true, the Russo bros. did say a while back in response to a possible secret invasion or civil war arc in the movies that "whatever the fans want, they'll probably get" so it's still not out the window.
And with the way they took Cap with Winter Soldier, starting either of those in a Cap movie would make sense.
I hated Civil War. It was my least favourite comic arc, ever - I could not understand why a superhero would ever be pro-registration, what with all the government control, superhero prison camps and straight out murder that occurred because of it. Then Steve Rogers having to take the fall for it all? Okay.
So yeah, I'm praying they never do this in the MCU, at least not as badly as it was done in the comics. But considering the Russo Brothers said it was a terrible idea I'm guessing people are getting worked up about nothing.
I can't see them doing the Civil War unless they add an immense amount of side characters. The Marvel Civil War is a conflict where the entire superhero community is at odds with each other. How would you portray that conflict if the main cast was limited to seven or eight main characters?
A lot of people want Spiderman and Xmen in the MCU. I think not having them is a blessing because it forces Marvel to dig deeper into their 75 years worth of comics to adapt into film. Think about it. If Marvel had the rights to Spiderman and Xmen, would we have gotten a Guardians of the Galaxy film? Would Tony Stark and Thor have become household names? Maybe, but I see the alternative reality of Marvel milking the cash cows that are Spiderman and Xmen and only doing that because of [I]investor confidence[/I].
[QUOTE=Katatonic717;46234276]Logic[/QUOTE]
Yeah was never official at all.
I assumed that because everybody was talking about it that Marvel had confirmed it on Twitter or some kind of social media and I missed it. But then I learnt that everybody was just basing it all round the Variety article which is "my mate told me XXXX I think he means YYYYY".
Then a lot of other places started reporting on it like it was fact and then Twitter became a game of chinese whispers until it all exploded.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
