• Forums Discussion v2 - GO TO PAGE 109 FOR SOMETHING NEAT
    4,995 replies, posted
[QUOTE=RenegadeCop;52222356]You underestimate the power of complaints[/QUOTE] He's not banned, so in this case I don't.
[QUOTE=pentium;52222337]If you hate his threads, why not beat him at his own quota? You can play just as dirty as him if you want so long as you follow the same conditions that has prevented him from being banned. If you don't want to do that because of ethics or level stooping sure but then you don't have much else to complain about lmao.[/QUOTE] The issue with this isn't ethics or anything like that. Anyone who does this would then be contributing to the exact problem they're complaining about to begin with.
[QUOTE=pentium;52222337]If you hate his threads, why not beat him at his own quota? You can play just as dirty as him if you want so long as you follow the same conditions that has prevented him from being banned. If you don't want to do that because of ethics or level stooping sure but then you don't have much else to complain about lmao.[/QUOTE] Yes everyone why don't you just start spamming threads dripping with bias and poor information. I dunno how no one thought of this before, truly the oracle of our times.
Moderators are moderators. If they get tired of it they'll make sure to inform everyone. In the meantime it at least brings some entertainment to SH now that all the girlfighting happens in Polidicks.
[QUOTE=pentium;52222337]If you hate his threads, why not beat him at his own quota? You can play just as dirty as him if you want so long as you follow the same conditions that has prevented him from being banned. If you don't want to do that because of ethics or level stooping sure but then you don't have much else to complain about lmao.[/QUOTE] I was actually thinking of posting pro-feminist stories constantly just to see what would happen but then I realised 1 second later that wouldn't contribute to anything. [editline]12th May 2017[/editline] Want to play 3D chess without wasting people's time? Make him obsolete. Post the same stories he's posting but instead provide all the facts from left, right, and center.
[QUOTE=postal;52222108]lol I don't remember any of that happening. Dav0r getting mod status happened like agggges ago in 2006ish, but I think I don't remember any drama from that?? likewise TH89 was a great moderator who just had that one drama issue where he banned some people that garry undid the bans for, but he wasn't demodded until way later when he requested it. Hell, even maxofs2D was actually fine at moderating and that just had outspoken views on feminism that pissed people off. The actual bans and such he did were, at least as far as I remember, totally fine. are we living in alternate realities??[/QUOTE] There was no drama for Dav0r, he was just a pretty bad poster back then, but then again everyone was. I just remember him being an awful poster and then being great overnight. Was really weird. Also, was it really 06? That must've been around the time I first came on the forums if so. Also, TH89 had that banning spree, that's what I was referencing. And MaxofS2D banned people for racism very frequently, so no, it wasn't just his views outside of modding. He once banned a dude for posting that orangutan watermelon image. How much more can you get? [editline]13th May 2017[/editline] [QUOTE=pentium;52222337]If you hate his threads, why not beat him at his own quota? You can play just as dirty as him if you want so long as you follow the same conditions that has prevented him from being banned. If you don't want to do that because of ethics or level stooping sure but then you don't have much else to complain about lmao.[/QUOTE] Isn't that what Judas is doing? I swear it's like the yin and yang of shitposters.
Dav0r was constantly drunk so that should explain a lot.
[QUOTE=pentium;52222337]If you hate his threads, why not beat him at his own quota? You can play just as dirty as him if you want so long as you follow the same conditions that has prevented him from being banned. If you don't want to do that because of ethics or level stooping sure but then you don't have much else to complain about lmao.[/QUOTE] [quote]Calvin:I'm thinking of starting my own talk radio show. I'll spout simplistic opinions for hours on end, ridicule anyone who disagrees with me, and generally foster divisiveness, cynicism, and a lower level of public dialog! Hobbes: It would seem you were born for the job. Calvin: Imagine getting paid to act like a six-year-old![/quote] "no"
What exactly is the protocol when a mod chronically PUI's?
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;52222369] Want to play 3D chess without wasting people's time? Make him obsolete. Post the same stories he's posting but instead provide all the facts from left, right, and center.[/QUOTE] I don't think that would change much considering I use left-leaning websites a lot of the time and don't really post in the OP much to begin with. I mean really it is just me posting it that gives it that sprinkle of spiciness that some people can't handle.
[QUOTE=Alice3173;52222298] Didn't he get demodded at some point and then remodded later on? I recall him not being a mod when I joined the site but being remodded around the same time Craptasket was modded.[/QUOTE] I remember him always being a mod before even me, and just that he took a break for awhile from moderating then came back later. that might be why you think he got remodded but maybe i'm wrong? it's been ages so idk [QUOTE=ForgottenKane;52222375]Also, was it really 06? That must've been around the time I first came on the forums if so.[/quote] it had to be since he got modded before me. was maybe even 05
[url]https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=795788[/url] sticky this
[QUOTE=download;52221429]Anyone else getting anti-virus warning from Facepunch atm? I have to assume it's an external image that's doing it. I'm using Avria.[/QUOTE] It's not just you, I had the same thing last night.
[QUOTE=Craptasket;52222385]Dav0r was constantly drunk so that should explain a lot.[/QUOTE] Can confirm, I used to talk to him sometimes in the FP steam group chat years ago back when that was still used The only thing I really remember is him almost burning his apartment down by passing out drunk with a pizza in the oven
[QUOTE=Tudd;52222401]I don't think that would change much considering I use left-leaning websites a lot of the time and don't really post in the OP much to begin with.[/QUOTE] I respect you as a person, I really do. But I really don't trust you when you say these sort of things. [URL="https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1555897"]People have caught you[/URL] being dishonest about what you've posted. Hell you very most likely still practice this sort of thing since [B]on occasion[/B] you post [URL="https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1563783"]really odd news stories[/URL] that are almost always found on milo's blog or [URL="http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/05/12/dont-call-caitlyn-baby-name-plunges-popularity/"]breitbart[/URL].
[QUOTE=Kiwi;52222396]Well. Craps banned UncleJim for apparently PUI so.[/QUOTE] Yee, though I did ask for it.
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;52222477]I respect you as a person, I really do. But I really don't trust you when you say these sort of things. [URL="https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1555897"]People have caught you[/URL] being dishonest about what you've posted. Hell you very most likely still practice this sort of thing since [B]on occasion[/B] you post [URL="https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1563783"]really odd news stories[/URL] that are almost always found on milo's blog or [URL="http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/05/12/dont-call-caitlyn-baby-name-plunges-popularity/"]breitbart[/URL].[/QUOTE] Well I have made mistakes, but considering the volume I post they really are the few times. And that thread specifically was probably my worst mistake of recent memory. Tho I would argue that I chose poorly my words on that title than intentionally trying to bait people like BDA implied. Now if you want to talk about where I see my news, then that is something I have already admitted, but everyone can observe that I seek the mainstream news sites we use constantly to ensure validity. I also peruse Huffington post and TYT quite often though so I don't think there is anything exceptional there besides that I obviously have right sided opinions and thus I view those sites too more often than users here. Plus I would never care about what users look at for their news sources that is alternative. If they get their news to post on here from TYT but used hard sources, then I really don't care cause that news still exists. Also I do appreciate that you don't get disgruntled with me like some users.. I do notice that now.
Has a mod ever BUI?
[QUOTE=Ott;52222597]Has a mod ever BUI?[/QUOTE] yes. see: any dav0r ban
[QUOTE=TrafficMan;52222459]Can confirm, I used to talk to him sometimes in the FP steam group chat years ago back when that was still used The only thing I really remember is him almost burning his apartment down by passing out drunk with a pizza in the oven[/QUOTE] god bless Dav0r
[QUOTE=Ott;52222597]Has a mod ever BUI?[/QUOTE] Yes
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;52221916]Hey look my mediabiasfactcheck idea got in the rules. So what is the definition of heavy bias? Was it my suggestion of anything left of left-center or anything right of right-center? [editline]4[/editline] Is it acceptable to post a past left-center source if you post a center source? I'm noticing that posting an article of heavy bias is fine as long as it's accompanied by a neutral article.[/QUOTE] As long as one of the sources is neutral (ideally that should be the source quoted) then it is fine [QUOTE=Alice3173;52222298]Legitimate question: Do you ever wonder why some of us don't actually respect you?[/QUOTE] No. [QUOTE=Alice3173;52222298]People keep repeatedly saying "we're [B][U]NOT[/U][/B] saying we want Tudd banned" and yet you won't let that idea go.[/QUOTE] The post I sarcastically responded to was specifically talking about Tudd having "ban immunity" [QUOTE=Zukriuchen;52219177]facepunch has banned people for doing exactly the same thing as tudd, the only difference is that the mods bought into his victim complex this time. so now the guy's completely insulated from getting banned for more than a day because the mods ~don't ban for opinions~ (except for all the other hundreds of times where they did)[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Ott;52222597]Has a mod ever BUI?[/QUOTE]Yeah, I got a few spammers here and there I think; then there's Dav0r's antics. [QUOTE=pentium;52222388]What exactly is the protocol when a mod chronically PUI's?[/QUOTE]I'm currently conducting a scientific experiment on this very subject.
[QUOTE=Hezzy;52223074]No.[/QUOTE] So you just don't care even though your job, as community manager, is to actually connect with people? [QUOTE]The post I sarcastically responded to was specifically talking about Tudd having "ban immunity"[/QUOTE] Regardless you give the same answers whether the posts you're replying to actually specifically talk about Tudd's ban immunity or not. The last discussion about Tudd had like one or two people bring up Tudd and banning with basically every single other person saying they didn't want Tudd banned and you guys still fell back to generalizing every argument that didn't fall in line with the mod team's policies as calling for Tudd to be banned. And even ignoring all that you still responded sarcastically and rather condescendingly to someone bringing up a seemingly valid disconnect between past moderator actions and now.
Hey are we still talkin' about Tudd in here.
[QUOTE=Pascall;52223217]Hey are we still talkin' about Tudd in here.[/QUOTE] Who?
[QUOTE=Pascall;52223217]Hey are we still talkin' about Tudd in here.[/QUOTE]Didn't he die? I saw it in a comic strip once, his friend poured whiskey over his stone-cold face.
RIP Tudd, you green bastard. Gone before your time.
I already miss Tudd. RIP. Died too young.
Literally crying rn. What did Tudd ever do to deserve this?? RIP.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.