Forums Discussion v2 - GO TO PAGE 109 FOR SOMETHING NEAT
4,995 replies, posted
I miss Granny PC.
Bring back spork-juct
is there any way to embed stuff from bandcamp?
Postal, who's your least and most favorable user/mod?
Least favorite? You.
Most favorite? Uhhhh not you
Damn dude I'm killing it but you keep setting me up for em dude you gotta admit ✋😂
[QUOTE=The bird Man;52291324]Postal, who's your least and most favorable user/mod?[/QUOTE]
Tudd/Tudd for everything.
Tudd is my favorite mod, least favorite user. My least favorite mod is the last one who banned me, and my favorite poster is me because I make the best posts.
Didn't we have threads for these in Fast Threads at one point?
[QUOTE=Raidyr;52292167]
Didn't we have threads for these in Fast Threads at one point?[/QUOTE]
yea but they almost always end up getting locked thanks to people getting offended at being mentioned/not mentioned
So why are posts like "Anonymous sources mean this isn't true" in Polidicks not considered bait or shitposting yet? Seems like It's the same couple people posting stuff along those lines and the thread always derails into "We've told you this hundreds of times they need to stay anonymous because" posts. And it just repeats in any thread that uses anonymous sources.
[QUOTE=MissingGlitch;52292209]So why are posts like "Anonymous sources mean this isn't true" in Polidick not considered bait or shitposting yet? Seems like It's the same couple people posting stuff along those lines and the thread always derails into "We've told you this hundreds of times they need to stay anonymous because" posts. And it just repeats in any thread that uses anonymous sources.[/QUOTE]
Because they are putting forward a completely reasonable, authentic political opinion that needs to be valued and if you think they are full of shit that just makes you a thin-skinned baby.
[QUOTE=MissingGlitch;52292209]So why are posts like "Anonymous sources mean this isn't true" in Polidick not considered bait or shitposting yet? Seems like It's the same couple people posting stuff along those lines and the thread always derails into "We've told you this hundreds of times they need to stay anonymous because" posts. And it just repeats in any thread that uses anonymous sources.[/QUOTE]
It's the new "That's a strawman".
It's the new "They only pooled 1000 people".
[QUOTE=MissingGlitch;52292209]So why are posts like "Anonymous sources mean this isn't true" in Polidick not considered bait or shitposting yet? Seems like It's the same couple people posting stuff along those lines and the thread always derails into "We've told you this hundreds of times they need to stay anonymous because" posts. And it just repeats in any thread that uses anonymous sources.[/QUOTE]
What [I]exactly[/I] are they saying? There's a difference between people showing [URL="https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/18/Anonymous-Authority"]skepticism[/URL] and saying that the claim is [URL="https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/51/Argument-from-Fallacy"]outright wrong[/URL].
Does it really matter what exactly is being said when in the end the problem is that it still caused the thread to go to shit and end up as yet another argument about how anonymous sources/pools/strawmans work instead of what the thread was originally about?
ok kiwi you can have the ban just take it!!!
[img]http://i.imgur.com/xZysDSC.png[/img]
this guys out of control don't put me in front of his crosshairs...
Is it still against the rules to use goatse as an avatar
[QUOTE=DrgnRebrn;52292708]Is it still against the rules to use goatse as an avatar[/QUOTE]
let's find out
[QUOTE=Kiwi;52292778]Nor do you have any originality to create something new.[/QUOTE]
are you asking us to make our own goatse
this was a mistake, now I have to leave this shitty avatar up for at least a few days for the sake of commitment to my low-effort joke
[QUOTE=Kiwi;52292813]As long as it's within the general NSFW rules. Sure. Open your eyes.[/QUOTE]
our eyes aren't the only things that are gonna be open
[QUOTE=Kiwi;52292778]Non of you have the balls to use the real thing as an avatar.
[editline]31st May 2017[/editline]
Nor do you have any originality to create something new.[/QUOTE]
[Img]https://my.mixtape.moe/mkomsk.jpg[/img]
Never forget
[QUOTE=rilez;52292513]ok kiwi you can have the ban just take it!!!
[img]http://i.imgur.com/xZysDSC.png[/img]
this guys out of control don't put me in front of his crosshairs...[/QUOTE]
they let rilez be mod? does that mean I can be mod?
[QUOTE=Asher Roth;52293317]they let rilez be mod? does that mean I can be mod?[/QUOTE]
I support you dad
[QUOTE=Kiwi;52292778]Non of you have the balls to use the real thing as an avatar.
[editline]31st May 2017[/editline]
Nor do you have any originality to create something new.[/QUOTE]
[IMG]https://i.imgur.com/32LO6o7.jpg[/IMG]
This is as close as I'm going.
[QUOTE=gastyne;52290099]Holy crap, how have you managed to avoid getting perma-permabanned with so many bans?[/QUOTE]
hehha, he is like a little baby to me
I am curious as to how Joe_the_fish kept his avatar for so long.
I remember seeing him have that avatar back in 2010.
his posts are so low quality as to distract attention from his avatar
FYI I'm not going to change your title if you make it hard for me.
I haven't written anything in HTML for a good 7 or 8 years and I don't have time to look things up. Send me the title so I can copy and paste it into the title box, or it won't get done!
I'm also not going to "surprise you" and change it to something. I don't have the time to be creative
Ey Hezzy can we get minor name changes?
Like cutting the 'Mr' off my username so it just reads 'Kotov'?
I'm fairly sure we can't get name changes until newpunch. I've asked before as I literally just need an O added to the end of my name : U
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.