• Forums Discussion v2 - GO TO PAGE 109 FOR SOMETHING NEAT
    4,995 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Tudd;52342864]Yah, I personally avoid anything that can be perceived as flaming, but someone saying "don't be a twat" I thought was pretty tame when I saw a flaming ban issued for that. As ROLFBURGER stated, I am also curious on if it is stricter in there.[/QUOTE] If calling someone a twat isn't flaming what is? Maybe the answer isn't to tone down flaming bans but maybe be like you and instead of outright flaming people just make posts with the subtext that the people you are replying to are idiots. [QUOTE=Pascall;52343044]It is stricter because we want to encourage effort being made in Polidicks AND in SH because too many times people use flaming, even tame flaming, to get around having to make an attempt at an actually good post. If you're gonna post in either of those sections you gotta put forth the effort to do so.[/QUOTE] I dunno, I find people are generally capable of making good posts with flames in them, as well as terrible posts without any ounce of an adversarial tone. Not to say I disagree with being harsh on flaming, but a lot of low effort posts occur in both sections that get by because they aren't flaming.
[QUOTE=AkujiTheSniper;52343412][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/xUN5xQN.gif[/IMG][/QUOTE] Woah I can see her chin and nose l-l-lewd
[video=youtube;9o7qUWAzq60]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o7qUWAzq60[/video] 😍
[QUOTE=Swebonny;52342172]Dude how many mod cocks did u take in the ass to get that dank title.[/QUOTE] How many breads have you eaten in your life?
sup yall have you considered banning tudd
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;52342759]Can we talk about what constitutes as flaming in polidicks? I'm just wondering if the policy on flaming has been stricter as of late, especially on polidicks. I'm noticing bans are being handed out for stuff that would easily fly if it was said 1 year ago. Not criticizing the strictness; If I had my way with Polidicks, I would ban people who keep using the same fallacy over and over again. Obligatory "Use common sense" but given how much has changed in the last year It would be nice to know if you're actually going from "if it's too harsh, it's a ban" to "ad hominem in any form is unacceptable".[/QUOTE] Polidicks generally is supposed to have a more mature tone about posting there, i.e. it kinda channels what Mass Debate was supposed to be way back when. That said ad hominem generally becomes a giant pissing match unless hard evidence/sources are posted with it. Its a delicate balancing act so typically I just tread lightly there and only post something if I have evidence to back it up.
[QUOTE=Reagy;52340558]Its up to the OP to provide a source, not other users and the source they linked wasn't the same one which the quote referenced. The OP had over an hour to also notice their mistake.[/QUOTE] This is a little late reply, but I why close the thread? The OP could still be banned for being lazy, but by closing the thread any discussion from it is cut short by consequence. Unless you're willing to let someone make a duplicate thread with the source included, but that would be a little redundant when the original thread could have been edited instead.
Every time I see that "Paid Mods" thread in SH on the ticker I keep thinking that FP mod donations are back.
[QUOTE=_Axel;52346173]How many breads have you eaten in your life?[/QUOTE] I long French baguette. You know the one I mean ;)
Hey guys I haven't started any threads yet so I'm gonna ask a stupid question. I'm thinking about making a thread where people rate and discuss books they've recently read, similar to the movie rating thread we already have. Would that be more of a General or Fast section thread? Or do we already have one and I'm just overlooking it? I did a search and didn't find anything recent.
[QUOTE=BelatedGamer;52352380]Or do we already have one and I'm just overlooking it? I did a search and didn't find anything recent.[/QUOTE] We've had several from what I recall. They just tend to die out rather quickly.
[QUOTE=BelatedGamer;52352380]Hey guys I haven't started any threads yet so I'm gonna ask a stupid question. I'm thinking about making a thread where people rate and discuss books they've recently read, similar to the movie rating thread we already have. Would that be more of a General or Fast section thread? Or do we already have one and I'm just overlooking it? I did a search and didn't find anything recent.[/QUOTE] "Any 'post your' threads belong in Fast Threads "
[QUOTE=da space core;52352719]"Any 'post your' threads belong in Fast Threads "[/QUOTE] Post yours with active discussion are worth keeping in GD, though, as long as there's discussion going on. Thing is we've had so many book threads that keep dying as is because of little to no activity.
[QUOTE=Alice3173;52352392]We've had several from what I recall. They just tend to die out rather quickly.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Zonesylvania;52352852]Post yours without active discussion are worth keeping in GD, though, as long as there's discussion going on. Thing is we've had so many book threads that keep dying as is because of little to no activity.[/QUOTE] So not worth trying I gather, that's too bad. Thanks for the answer anyway.
You could always [URL="https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1556287"]bump this thread with content[/URL]
[QUOTE=Zonesylvania;52352852]Post yours with active discussion are worth keeping in GD, though, as long as there's discussion going on. Thing is we've had so many book threads that keep dying as is because of little to no activity.[/QUOTE] Thats the point. Continuous ongoing thrrads like this one belong in GD, the ones that are destined to die quickly go to ft
[URL="https://facepunch.com/member.php?u=455835"]Do we really need straight up porn avatars?[/URL]
it's a butt
[QUOTE=Pascall;52356744]it's a butt[/QUOTE] Softcore porn but porn nonetheless. Just seems tasteless.
they show butts on discovery channel
:qsex101: can i set my avatar to cartoon dildos without repercussions [editline]4[/editline] asking for a friend
[QUOTE=Pascall;52356764]they show butts on discovery channel[/QUOTE] To be fair discovery channel does it in a medical purposes. But aye you guys are the boss so I'll drop it.
[QUOTE=Propane Addict;52356784]To be fair discovery channel does it in a medical purposes. But aye you guys are the boss so I'll drop it.[/QUOTE] [t]http://images.zap2it.com/assets/p11925289_b_h3_aa/naked-and-afraid.jpg[/t]
[QUOTE=Pascall;52356789][t]http://images.zap2it.com/assets/p11925289_b_h3_aa/naked-and-afraid.jpg[/t][/QUOTE] That's a television show?? I guess it's been a while since the last time I watched television. [editline]13th June 2017[/editline] What happened to the Discovery Channel?
"if it's on the discovery channel then it's okay as an avatar" are you sure you want to open that can of piss
allow full-blown hardcore porn avatars already
if avatars go full on NSFW, I'm sure they'll be lots of requests in that avatar request thread.
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;52356805]"if it's on the discovery channel then it's okay as an avatar" are you sure you want to open that can of piss[/QUOTE] hey i mean if someone out here wants to have an avatar of like lions fucking on the savannah or something who am I to say otherwise.......
[QUOTE=Pascall;52357026]hey i mean if someone out here wants to have an avatar of like lions fucking on the savannah or something who am I to say otherwise.......[/QUOTE] who's gonna bite the bullet? [img]https://media.giphy.com/media/l3vR3MQEtp9Ibxbc4/giphy-downsized-large.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=Propane Addict;52356723][URL="https://facepunch.com/member.php?u=455835"]Do we really need straight up porn avatars?[/URL][/QUOTE] You say that yet I've ran with worse, for over a year. We've got Postal's fucking ass is an emote, Garry posts his damn dick on Twitter and the forum is related to a game where people run around naked with various sized dicks and your concern is someone having a smooth, round, toned butt as their avatar. God wheres that dogs ass avatar when we need it. Basically what I'm saying is grow up, and stop browsing FP at work.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.