Forums Discussion v2 - GO TO PAGE 109 FOR SOMETHING NEAT
4,995 replies, posted
and anime girls
[QUOTE=LoneWolf_Recon;52358270]Everyone should just have cute cats and dogs as there avas. Nothing can go wrong there.[/QUOTE]
slippery slope right into the fursuit
[QUOTE=Limed00d;52358320]slippery slope right into the fursuit[/QUOTE]
Nah, considering a bunch of FPers here already have fursona avas and no one bats an eye. [sp]And hell, I'm the one who started a fursuit megathread on FP 2.0 and everyone there is pretty chill.[/sp]
We'll be fineeee.
[QUOTE=LoneWolf_Recon;52358344][sp]And hell, I'm the one who started a fursuit megathread on FP 2.0 and everyone there is pretty chill.[/sp]
[/QUOTE]
That thread has 8 posts and the subforum is fucking dead no wonder everything in there is chill
[QUOTE=Thunderbolt;52358386]That thread has 8 posts and the subforum is fucking dead no wonder everything in there is chill[/QUOTE]
Atleast I tried :c
I know how we can solve the crisis of avatars. One of the main arguments are that it's purely attention seeking. While [del]complete bullshit and the bitching is probably a reason that people use said avatars,[/del] I am a mentally damaged gorilla, here's how we can counter the argument.
Reinstate WTYO as an allowed thread topic and let it become a dumping ground of absolute shit like last time. I fail to see how this can go wrong. Instead of borderline furry porn avatars being used for attention, they can post murder-porn involving furries for attention instead.
[QUOTE=JerryAnderson;52358526]I know how we can solve the crisis of avatars. One of the main arguments are that it's purely attention seeking. While complete bullshit and the bitching is probably a reason that people use said avatars, here's how we can counter the argument.
Reinstate WTYO as an allowed thread topic and let it become a dumping ground of absolute shit like last time. I fail to see how this can go wrong. Instead of borderline furry porn avatars being used for attention, they can post murder-porn involving furries for attention instead.[/QUOTE]
Nice try there.
[QUOTE=Craptasket;52357119]too bad[/QUOTE]
long live the king
[QUOTE=JerryAnderson;52358526]I know how we can solve the crisis of avatars. One of the main arguments are that it's purely attention seeking. [B]While complete bullshit [/B]and [B]the bitching is probably a reason that people use said avatars[/B], here's how we can counter the argument.
[/QUOTE]
You contradicted yourself in the same sentence.
[QUOTE=Oicani Gonzales;52358517]reposting my script in case you just absolutely [I]cannot [/I]handle this [B]degeneracy[/B] on your christian forums anymore: [url]https://userstyles.org/styles/142392/facepunch-avatar-cleanup[/url]
easy to customize and block your (least) favourite user avatars!
never see explicit hardcore porn such as buttocks in an avatar again!
reclaim your spot in heaven with this one simple userstyle!
this is what a user avatar purged of degeneracy looks like:
[t]http://i.imgur.com/j6xmlFy.png[/t]
works for any user and you can customized the family-safe image too!!![/QUOTE]
i ain't buying your wares you snake oil salesman, nice try maybe next time
[QUOTE=Trekintosh;52358597]You contradicted yourself in the same sentence.[/QUOTE]
Fixed. Blame lack of sleep.
E: Actually, I dunno about that. I think it's less attention seeking, and more or less just finding it funny when people flip shit over ultimately trivial matters. One could easily lump the two together if they wanted, but I doubt either really are the real reasons behind it. What IS the real reason I dunno.
Just curious if the ratings rule for SH applies here.
[url]https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1567851&p=52358664&viewfull=1#post52358664[/url]
[quote]Ratings
These have been re-enabled in this forum. I expect you to use them appropriately and be sensible. If you rate a school shooting as "funny" like some kind of 12 year old edge lord, you are going to be banned.
If you see somebody being an idiot with ratings, contact a Moderator by PM. Don't post about it in the thread; these will be treated as derailing and off topic.[/quote]
I personally don't see why calling for deescalation of violence is funny.
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Bitching about ratings, don't you know better?" - rilez))[/highlight]
[sp]WTYO will live on in our avatars[/sp]
[QUOTE=RenegadeCop;52359157]It may have something to do with your reputation for bias. I don't get the irony myself, but I'm sure it is there.[/QUOTE]
I am sincere in never wanting violence, and I think it is inappropriate to rate such a post funny.
Who cares what my political bias is.
I think they are laughing at you, not the post.
[QUOTE=RenegadeCop;52359173]I don't know man, people just may not take you seriously.[/QUOTE]
So then it isn't inappropriate to rate funny on the topic of people being shot and the rule has no meaning because of the user?
[editline]14th June 2017[/editline]
[QUOTE=Pascall;52359185]I think they are laughing at you, not the post.[/QUOTE]
So what is the funny part about me posting in a thread over people getting shot? Does my bias make my message insincere?
I still don't see how this voids the rule tho just because who posted it. It is still rating funny over a post talking about shooting people is awful, which is still inappropriate to any sane person.
[QUOTE=Tudd;52359188]
So what is the funny part about me posting in a thread over people getting shot? Does my bias make my message insincere?[/QUOTE]
I think you're pretty aware of how most people on this forum see you, whether right or wrong.
[QUOTE=thelurker1234;52359207]I think you're pretty aware of how most people on this forum see you, whether right or wrong.[/QUOTE]
I am actually genuinely curious if people think my calls for deescalation aren't sincere. Because that is what it implies.
[QUOTE=Tudd;52359188]So then it isn't inappropriate to rate funny on the topic of people being shot and the rule has no meaning because of the user?
[editline]14th June 2017[/editline]
So what is the funny part about me posting in a thread over people getting shot? [B]Does my bias make my message insincere?[/B]
I still don't see how this voids the rule tho just because who posted it. It is still rating funny over a post talking about shooting people is awful, which is still inappropriate to any sane person.[/QUOTE]
from an outside perspective, a little bit tbh.
especially with the whole bringing up of antifa which doesn't really have anything to do with the thread itself.
[QUOTE=Trebgarta;52359212]I find it funny how you plugged "Antifa and the Free Speech rallies" in there[/QUOTE]
Because it is escalation of both sides, and this event can lead to that aswell.
[QUOTE=Tudd;52359216]I am actually genuinely curious if people think my calls for deescalation aren't sincere. Because that is what it implies.[/QUOTE]
Probably yes. A lot of people think you're a disingenuous poster.
Just ignore it and move on, nobody is obliged to take you serious in any form.
[QUOTE=Pascall;52359218]from an outside perspective, a little bit tbh.
especially with the whole bringing up of antifa which doesn't really have anything to do with the thread itself.[/QUOTE]
It is related and sincere. When people started to pelt eggs or fist fight at political rallies during the campaign, it led to people masking up. Then you had one side start armoring up, and now we have organized political brawls at college universities and cities. Even at Berkeley, Antifa started using M80s and smoke grenades.
It is escalation of political violence, and an event like this has potential to do something similar.
[editline]14th June 2017[/editline]
[QUOTE=thelurker1234;52359228]Probably yes. A lot of people think you're a disingenuous poster.[/QUOTE]
I just hope nobody thinks I am not sincere with calls for peace. Cause that is really disappointing to me to have people think that.
[QUOTE=Tudd;52359249][...]
I just hope nobody thinks I am not sincere with calls for peace. Cause that is really disappointing to me to have people think that.[/QUOTE]
It's entirely your fault really, people did let you know for a long time, that they don't approve of your disingenious and biased posting habits, just because it didn't get you banned, doesn't mean that anyone has to approve of it now.
[QUOTE=Tudd;52359249]It is related and sincere. When people started to pelt eggs or fist fight at political rallies during the campaign, it led to people masking up. Then you had one side start armoring up, and now we have organized political brawls at college universities and cities. Even at Berkeley, Antifa started using M80s and smoke grenades.
It is escalation of political violence, and an event like this has potential to do something similar.
[editline]14th June 2017[/editline]
I just hope nobody thinks I am not sincere with calls for peace. Cause that is really disappointing to me to have people think that.[/QUOTE]
To be frank, I think sgman91 is far better than you or any one of the people who've supported Trump on the forums because he at least tries to argue somewhat convincingly, when you pull out of half the threads you post in or create when the arguments get tough.
You've failed to demonstrate nuance in your arguments and views more often than not, and fail to realize what other people are trying to say, for instance when they talk about how Trump's rhetoric is destabilizing rational politics, but insist that they must be blaming incidences of violence directly on Donald Trump. He's also done very little in the way of actually condemning those incidences, by the way, or called for them to stop, as far as I know.
Nobody has to approve of your bias or your posting habits even if they don't get you banned and even if they aren't breaking the rules.
Tudd, why do you care about ratings?
If I made this many posts whining about being rated things I don't want I'd be banned for "cares about ratings"
[QUOTE=kilerabv;52359407]Tudd, why do you care about ratings?[/QUOTE]
I normally don't care, but I remembered the new rule and was just wondering if this is a case for that.
Either way, no need to go further on that topic.
[editline]14th June 2017[/editline]
[QUOTE=Trekintosh;52359419]If I made this many posts whining about being rated things I don't want I'd be banned for "cares about ratings"[/QUOTE]
Well then the rule would just be a catch 22.
[QUOTE=Tudd;52359449]Well then the rule would just be a catch 22.[/QUOTE]
Not really, just don't care about ratings and that's it.
[QUOTE=Tudd;52359249]
I just hope nobody thinks I am not sincere with calls for peace. Cause that is really disappointing to me to have people think that.[/QUOTE]
Nobody on this board takes you seriously and you have done everything in your power to earn that reputation.
[QUOTE=Tudd;52359449]
Well then the rule would just be a catch 22.[/QUOTE]
I can't even remember when the rule was enforced. People gave good reasons why the people rating funny probably aren't doing it because of the violence.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.