• Forums Discussion v2 - GO TO PAGE 109 FOR SOMETHING NEAT
    4,995 replies, posted
[QUOTE=NovaConsors;52182591]Uh hi, I was hoping that a moderator could move my thread ([url]https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1562651[/url]) to SH. I put it in FT because I thought it was just going to blow over, but now I know that this issue is more pervasive and people should know. Because SH has more viewers and the situation might develop for some time I would like the thread to be moved. I attempted to message 2 moderators, but apparently because I have under 50 posts I cannot use the messaging system here. (So I am not sure there is a better place to ask) Ok continue talking about Tudd now[/QUOTE] Thanks for warning people but it's fine where it is
[QUOTE=Craptasket;52182073]Ill finger slip and permaban Tudd and rake in the massive cred and become facepunch famous. A huge parade on the streets and Hezzy awarding me a golden plaque[/QUOTE] Craptasket: The mod we need, but not the one we deserve.
[QUOTE=mdeceiver79;52180705]Can we talk about the editorialising titles thing? People are getting banned over seemingly innocuous titles. Some people make purposeful shitty titles (me) and get banned for it but that shouldn't be a reason to flat out ban anybody for editorialising titles. Under this system there is no option to make fun titles with alliteration or word play type titles. It takes some of the Soul out of SH and leads to people arguing and mod involvement where the majority of people would have been happy without mod involvement. Don't get me wrong you guys do a great job but the editorialising titles flat rule seems unnecessary. News papers/MSM news outlets play with titles and they're 5 or 6 levels below the average facepunch user in terms of e-credz and general pizzazz. Is the aim to stop all title changes or to make mods jobs easier by easing the burden of agency regarding whether or not a title is ok? Would Sartre not say that is living in bad faith??[/QUOTE] Lets actually talk about this. I think the current rule is that titles that add something negative or take away something positive from the original title are banned, and not just editorialization. For example. I think my thread title of "[URL="https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1562569"]Former white supremacist: 'Show compassion to someone who has no compassion.'[/URL]" is fine because it's much better than "Former white supremacist has tips for talking to refugee 'haters'" and it expresses the same point as the previous title. If your title edit spins the story then that should be a no-no. If it adds humor appropriately then that should be fine. This is very similar to that whole video games reference ban that was put in place because 2 or 3 people kept making terrible video game puns in threads full of death and despair so it was decided to ban all videogame references in news articles.
[QUOTE=MissingGlitch;52182626]I thought this whole Tudd business would make a great political cartoon. [t]https://i.imgur.com/db03jXq.png[/t][/QUOTE] Where's the dinosaur? Shame.
they were extinct over 60 million years ago
The day you guys stop talking about Tudd for every hour of the day is the day when Kiwi gets their permissions unfucked and can actually save their profile settings. Think of the Kiwi.
[QUOTE=Reagy;52182996]The day you guys stop talking about Tudd for every hour of the day is the day when Kiwi gets their permissions unfucked and can actually save their profile settings. Think of the Kiwi.[/QUOTE] Great, even more of a reason to shitpost irrelevantly over a user nobody should care about. Thanks Reagy for the motivation!
[QUOTE=BlackMageMari;52183004]Great, even more of a reason to shitpost irrelevantly over a user nobody should care about. Thanks Reagy for the motivation![/QUOTE] N-no that's not what I meant!
[QUOTE=Reagy;52182996]The day you guys stop talking about Tudd for every hour of the day is the day when Kiwi gets their permissions unfucked and can actually save their profile settings. Think of the Kiwi.[/QUOTE] Will posting more get Kiwi's avatar size reduced even more? If so I might join in!
[QUOTE=Kiwi;52183013]Twat. Now I'll never get em back.[/QUOTE] I'm sorry. :frown:
every week we go without someone complaining about tudd I'll give kiwi back an extra pixel to his max avatar dimensions. every day we go with someone complaining about tudd I'm taking one away. he is currently at 50x50 i think this is a pretty fair deal tbh thanks for the suggestion reagy
Sensationalist Headlines just makes me mad every time. It's why I like it.
[QUOTE=postal;52183033]every week we go without someone complaining about tudd I'll give kiwi back an extra pixel to his max avatar dimensions. every day we go with someone complaining about tudd I'm taking one away. he is currently at 50x50 i think this is a pretty fair deal tbh thanks for the suggestion reagy[/QUOTE] Does this mean I get out of naughty now?
RIP Kiwi's avatar Shrunken like a dick in a swimming pool
[QUOTE=Reagy;52183039]Does this mean I get out of naughty now?[/QUOTE] no. just for asking I'm adding another month to your sentence.
[QUOTE=postal;52183042]no. just for asking I'm adding another month to your sentence.[/QUOTE] Literally crying.
[QUOTE=postal;52183042]no. just for asking I'm adding another month to your sentence.[/QUOTE] Can posting about Tudd also get the naughty sentence stretched further for Reag? This is like a dunk tank.
[QUOTE=wingless;52183050]Can posting about Tudd also get the naughty sentence stretched further for Reag? This is like a dunk tank.[/QUOTE] [media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPPpfD5ArQA[/media]
[QUOTE=postal;52183033]every week we go without someone complaining about tudd I'll give kiwi back an extra pixel to his max avatar dimensions. every day we go with someone complaining about tudd I'm taking one away. he is currently at 50x50 i think this is a pretty fair deal tbh thanks for the suggestion reagy[/QUOTE] tudd tudd tudd tudd tudd tudd tudd tudd tudd tudd tudd does the effect stack tudd tudd tudd tudd tudd tudd tudd tudd tudd tudd tudd
[QUOTE=Kiwi;52183043]Worst deal ever[/QUOTE] This has been the worst trade deal in the history of trade deals, maybe ever.
Everything I touch apparently burns and gets punished as much as I do. This was a mistake. :v:...
[QUOTE=Reagy;52183059][media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPPpfD5ArQA[/media][/QUOTE] is that a yes?
[QUOTE=Reagy;52183092]Everything I touch apparently burns and gets punished as much as I do. This was a mistake. :v:...[/QUOTE] Touch Tudd. Please. Do it for me.
[QUOTE=Paramud;52183197]Touch Tudd. Please. Do it for me.[/QUOTE] Sorry he's too nice to me. And not my type either.
[QUOTE=The Genie;52183258]You threw Kiwi under the bus just so that you could try and get a bigger avatar :thinking: This is what anime does - it destroys friendships.[/QUOTE] I miss the maid ok. And I've always been [I]dirty[/I].
can't imagine anything being dirtier than those apples
[QUOTE=Reagy;52182320]Chrome thing, JS hangs and Chrome goes into shutdown. Just reload the tab if anything or move to the dev channel, I haven't experienced it in months since moving away from the release channel.[/QUOTE] Didn't someone mention earlier that disabling smooth scroll would also fix the issue? I don't use Chrome but anyone who does and has the problem might consider trying that to verify if that's a valid solution as well.
what was that one plugin that let you hover over banned avatars to see the user's actual avatar? iirc it also had scores on the top right of posts and other features
Faceraper. [url]https://github.com/xelivous/facelift/raw/master/faceraper2013.user.js[/url]
Basic BBCode like [noparse][I]these [/I][B]sorts [/B][U]of words [/U]dont work in visitors messages.[/noparse]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.