Publicly denouncing pedophiles - General

[QUOTE=deathgod;16812491]Sounds like you're blindly following age of consent laws.[/QUOTE] There is one definite line and that is puberty. Most countries now use a proximity system in which if you are within 2-3 years of age with the person you are having sex with it is good. That keeps 16 year olds from fucking 4 year olds while allowing 16 year olds to have sex with other 16 year olds. The proxy limitations end at the age of consent, 18.

[QUOTE=Lankist;16818019]There is one definite line and that is puberty. Most countries now use a proximity system in which if you are within 2-3 years of age with the person you are having sex with it is good. That keeps 16 year olds from fucking 4 year olds while allowing 16 year olds to have sex with other 16 year olds. The proxy limitations end at the age of consent, 18.[/QUOTE] Do the age proximity laws still apply across the age of consent? For instance a 19-year-old and a 17-year-old?

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;16818107]Do the age proximity laws still apply across the age of consent? For instance a 19-year-old and a 17-year-old?[/QUOTE] Yes. Not all US states have adopted them but they're becoming the standard. I think they're tired of dealing with angry fathers of 17 year olds pressing charges against horny 18 year olds.

[QUOTE=cmanatlan;16809411]Woah, calm down. First of all, most of us came to an agreement, I agree with Lankist's reply to my last post. Second of all, I am just arguing my opinions, and maybe psychologically it is because I have a few fetishes I am ashamed of, but pedophilia is not one of them, so stop flaming.[/QUOTE] Do you ever think through what you're saying? This is the most insubstantial argument I've seen. "Most of us came to an agreement" - why does the existence of an agreement invalidate all other opinions? "I am just arguing my opinions" - is that an excuse for talking out of your ass and supporting pedophilia?

[QUOTE=snuwoods;16818398]Do you ever think through what you're saying? This is the most insubstantial argument I've seen. "Most of us came to an agreement" - why does the existence of an agreement invalidate all other opinions? "I am just arguing my opinions" - is that an excuse for talking out of your ass and supporting pedophilia?[/QUOTE] You are exceedingly annoying did you know that

Hey guys, I found two more. :/ MEURTRIERE means "MURDERER" in the female form. [img]http://i28.tinypic.com/blesk.jpg[/img] [img]http://i27.tinypic.com/289fw20.jpg[/img]

The proximity laws are good ideas.

[QUOTE=jcallan;16820035]The proximity laws are good ideas.[/QUOTE] I don't think anyone thinks they're bad ideas. Except for pedophiles. [editline]04:19PM[/editline] They're like WOAH WOAH woah woah woah way to cock block mang

inb4 pedophile shistorm also loltitle

[QUOTE=Cheesemonkey;16820424]inb4 pedophile shistorm also loltitle[/QUOTE] Your title is like saying rape doesn't always have a victim.

So is the general consensus that a sexual attraction to children that one is born with can't have a morality attached to it, but pedophilia as the law sees it and child molestation are definitely wrong?

[QUOTE=Blobicus;16820559]So is the general consensus that a sexual attraction to children that one is born with can't have a morality attached to it, but pedophilia as the law sees it and child molestation are definitely wrong?[/QUOTE] the general consensus is that h8ers gonna h8

Unless anyone else wants to add anything, I think this thread is just about wrapped up.

[QUOTE=<3 Riutse <3;16824275]Unless anyone else wants to add anything, I think this thread is just about wrapped up.[/QUOTE] who the fuck are you

[QUOTE=Lankist;16824371]who the fuck are you[/QUOTE] fuck the who are you

[QUOTE=TRA;16786436]it could be an advertisement that is trying to show that pedophiles aren't just old guys with big beards[/QUOTE] My uncle is a pedophile, and he has a big beard. [img]http://b2.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/00490/22/01/490221022_l.jpg[/img]

Lol I finally figured out what they are. -_-

[QUOTE=<3<3;16829308]Lol I finally figured out what they are. -_-[/QUOTE] What paedopiles are ? Can I join you under your rock ?

[QUOTE=jcallan;16831163]What paedopiles are ? Can I join you under your rock ?[/QUOTE] He means the billboards dingus. The original purpose of this thread. So... what are they?

[QUOTE=Cluckyx;16831227]He means the billboards dingus. The original purpose of this thread. So... what are they?[/QUOTE] [url]http://www.24hmontreal.canoe.ca/24hmontreal/actualites/archives/2009/08/20090819-164727.html[/url] An upcoming T.V. show. -_-

[QUOTE=<3<3;16831493][url]http://www.24hmontreal.canoe.ca/24hmontreal/actualites/archives/2009/08/20090819-164727.html[/url] An upcoming T.V. show. -_-[/QUOTE] I am so thoroughly underwhelmed...

Hahaha waste of a thread. [editline]10:55AM[/editline] [quote=l'ony honh honh]In recent days, it is not the posters that adorn the greater Montreal, but the face of individuals identified as "murderers" or "pedophile." Checks, it is an advertising company Astral to publicize a new program that will air in the fall, Channel D. There is no concern to ensure the communications giant. The goal of the campaign was to react and obviously Astral successful coup. "This is a teaser for a new issue. People should not be afraid, "said Frédérique Grenouillat, Communications Manager at Astral Media. However, impossible to extract more information about Ms. Grenouillat of the television and its relationship with the posters that are found in Montreal, Laval and Longueuil. "There is a second video which will be shown Friday and all people will understand. It will be very clear, "limited" she said. But who are these people on the posters? These are portraits of "invented" from scratch. "These are photos made with the eye, the nose of another, the mouth of another, etc..," Says Frédérique Grenouillat. The latter indicates that it was very important for the company not to use people who actually exist.[/quote] Google Translated.

I still don't get why this is up for debate, if you have sex with children, you aren't fit for society. You may say thats rough but jesus think of the kids...

I dunno, I feel those pictures extremely uncomfortable to look at.

[QUOTE=lazyguy;16831626]Hahaha waste of a thread. [editline]10:55AM[/editline] Google Translated.[/QUOTE] Didn't do a great job lol, I'm french so I would know. Pretty decent though for translation software.

[QUOTE=HQRSE;16833640]Didn't do a great job lol, I'm french so I would know. Pretty decent though for translation software.[/QUOTE] Yeah that's not too good. I'm french too. It's a viral advertisement for a tv show, but besides that the article doesn't say much. Oh yeah, and they're not real people, but you can understand that from the translation.

Google Translator is pretty good actually.