Forums Discussion v3 - Post about Tudd and win a 1 month ban
5,023 replies, posted
[QUOTE=garry;52816557]On this note, the current plan for the forums is
- Make new [URL="https://rust.facepunch.com/f/"]Sites Forums[/URL] feature match this forum
- Kill [URL="https://lab.facepunch.com/"]lab.facepunch.com[/URL]
- Move GMod forum to [URL="https://gmod.facepunch.com/f"]new sites forum[/URL]
- Move this forum to [URL="https://forum.facepunch.com/f/"]new sites forum[/URL] (which should 90% emulate the look and feel of this forum)
- Kill this forum
- Improve incrementally[/QUOTE]
I'm liking this iteration of the forums. If you don't mind me asking, whats the reason for wanting to split off the Garry's Mod section from the main forum?
He secretly hates Garrys mod but he has gotta makw his fans happy.
New Forum looks lit, but very bare bones and the ratings are meh... Vote Bad Reading for 2030!
Pretty sure ratings arent the top priority atm
[QUOTE=Nomad;52817135]I'm liking this iteration of the forums. If you don't mind me asking, whats the reason for wanting to split off the Garry's Mod section from the main forum?[/QUOTE]
All of our project sites will have their own forum, but they'll all still be on the main forum.
I'm extremely happy that labpunch is poofing in favor of this new forum. It looks lovely and less hectic than the last one appeared it was going to be.
What'll be the deal with paid upgrades such as titles for yourself/other users, will those be moved over in time or be completely scrapped when we move over to the new forum?
[QUOTE=garry;52817030]But you don't know anything about it?[/QUOTE]
To me, I certainly have some worries about it simply based on what you listed for rewards.
The idea of having to unlock what is already basic forum functionality for the vast majority of us seems silly.
It's the idea of having to put in work to be able to use the things I have for the longest time already. It wouldn't be so bad if these were for unlocking completely new functionality or enhancements (Like you said, avatar size increase.) but doing it to existing, standard functionality is, if anything, annoying.
Maybe I'm way off base here, but I think this covers what other people were worried about too and maybe I'm totally misreading what you were intending by that but it does sound like a potential nuisance.
This looks fantastic.
Will old threads be moved over to the new forum? If not will there be an archive for old fp so we can have it for reference in the future?
Aight so maybe I'm bad at reading or skipped over it but custom forums, they still a thing?
I see you brought over polidicks but there was a fp pol board that I created but im unsure what's going on
[editline]25th October 2017[/editline]
(the pol fourm was made long before polidicks)
[img]https://facepunch.com/fp/forums/396.png?1[/img]
I never understood what this icon was supposed to be. what is it?
[QUOTE=toaster468;52817646][img]https://facepunch.com/fp/forums/396.png?1[/img]
I never understood what this icon was supposed to be. what is it?[/QUOTE]
a dick with trump hair at a podium. blame icemaz
[QUOTE=toaster468;52817646][img]https://facepunch.com/fp/forums/396.png?1[/img]
I never understood what this icon was supposed to be. what is it?[/QUOTE]
A penis with a trump wig.
That's all it is.
[editline]24th October 2017[/editline]
Dammit Postal
Never realized that was supposed to be a wiener. Legitimately just thought it was Trump.
[QUOTE=postal;52817650]a dick with trump hair at a podium. blame icemaz[/QUOTE]
I'll have you know it was my idea but I just didn't want to go through the effort of looking at pictures of veiny reference cocks to make the icon myself
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;52817716]Never realized that was supposed to be a wiener. Legitimately just thought it was Trump.[/QUOTE]
whats the difference
[QUOTE=Pigbear;52817732]whats the difference[/QUOTE]
I don't suck Trumps
[QUOTE=TrafficMan;52817730]I'll have you know it was my idea but I just didn't want to go through the effort of looking at pictures of veiny reference cocks to make the icon myself[/QUOTE]
I do the things no one else wants to
also postal kept asking for people to make any icon, and after like 2 months I was the only one who did it
[QUOTE=postal;52817650]a dick with trump hair at a podium. blame icemaz[/QUOTE]
Wait THATS what it is? I thought it was a fucking hen and a chick on a pedestal.
Can it [I]please[/I] be bannable to make bold claims and refuse to provide sources when requested for them in polidicks, while we're still on this forum?
Is this new site getting direct image uploading?
[QUOTE=garry;52816557]On this note, the current plan for the forums is
- Make new [URL="https://rust.facepunch.com/f/"]Sites Forums[/URL] feature match this forum
- Kill [URL="https://lab.facepunch.com/"]lab.facepunch.com[/URL]
- Move GMod forum to [URL="https://gmod.facepunch.com/f"]new sites forum[/URL]
- Move this forum to [URL="https://forum.facepunch.com/f/"]new sites forum[/URL] (which should 90% emulate the look and feel of this forum)
- Kill this forum
- Improve incrementally[/QUOTE]
Hit me up when you get twitter or email sessions based logins
my number one request is allowing the use of alt+s to post
[QUOTE=Kiwi;52818082]This is bannable. [B]Post offending posts.[/B][/QUOTE]
It's bannable, but you encourage it??? :v:
[QUOTE=Kiwi;52818082]This is bannable. Post offending posts.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Jim Morrison;52817728]Let me elaborate: Trump has [I]financial[/I] ties to Russia. He's undeniably a corrupt businessman. He has financial ties to Russia, Saudi Arabia, and numerous others. What I disagree with is the prevailing mainstream narrative that Trump actively colluded with Russian agents or that the Russians helped him win at all.
They're wrong about the "Russia swung the election for Trump" narrative. They're right about "Trump has illegal financial ties to Russia" (which often doesn't go reported in favor of the former sensationalist headline). They won't cooperate because they [I]are[/I] guilty of corruption and Trump doesn't want people finding out about his dirty money. That's why he fired Comey. It's not because of some conspiratorial Russian espionage plot.[/QUOTE]
After request for citing sources he makes additional claims without sources :v:
On mobile and having trouble linking directly sorry
[editline]10:23[/editline]
thanks kiwi bby
[QUOTE=Quark:;52818163]After request for citing sources he makes additional claims without sources :v:
On mobile and having trouble linking directly sorry[/QUOTE]
Judging by his initial posts it looks like he thinks that not having evidence for an event happening is proof that it didn't happen, rather than just a claim without evidence.
[QUOTE=Snickerdoodle;52818339]Judging by his initial posts it looks like he thinks that not having evidence for an event happening is proof that it didn't happen, rather than just a claim without evidence.[/QUOTE]
There is evidence for the event happening. He's making a claim, he's getting requests for sources, ignoring them, and making another claim (without sources)
[QUOTE=Jim Morrison;52817814]Is that a yes then? Because in my opinion it's more likely that Hillary lost because she was a flawed status quo candidate running against a fake populist and not because Russian trolls were posting Facebook memes. [B]The right-wing was [I]already[/I] posting the same fucking memes, by the way.[/B][/QUOTE]
im gonna need some citations for those memes
Why does [URL="http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1121510"]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1121510[/URL] have so many viewers
[QUOTE=Hilton;52818492]Why does [URL="http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1121510"]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1121510[/URL] have so many viewers[/QUOTE]
Someone linked it on reddit.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.