Forums Discussion v3 - Post about Tudd and win a 1 month ban
5,023 replies, posted
[QUOTE=TheJoker;52697026]At this point the mods aren't going to do anything to Tudd even if he does break any rules[/QUOTE]
Cool, so now you know your ultimate defense against Tudd: ignore him
:snip:
[QUOTE=Tudd;52696934]So by the quotation marks around news, are you suggesting what I post is fake news?
Because they certainly happened. Only the academic enrollment thread and climate change ones are speculative, but speculative threads are not new at all on Facepunch. Just to require correct sourcing and not be opinion pieces.[/QUOTE]
No one is judging the credibility of your posts or news topics. If you were posting false claims, you would have been banned long before complaints arose about you.
We're judging that you seem to be sharing only stories and headlines about specific topics which has been known to fit your political narrative. How do you fail to understand the root of everyone's complaining? If you varied your posts, literally none of this complaining about you would have happened. Just look at [url=https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1576300&p=52695859&viewfull=1#post52695859]da space core's post[/url] detailing it and stop dodging the issue.
[QUOTE=BackSapper;52697106]No one is judging the credibility of your posts or news topics. If you were posting false claims, you would have been banned long before complaints arose about you.
We're judging that you seem to be sharing only stories and headlines about specific topics which has been known to fit your political narrative. How do you fail to understand the root of everyone's complaining? If you varied your posts, literally none of this complaining about you would have happened. Just look at [url=https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1576300&p=52695859&viewfull=1#post52695859]da space core's post[/url] detailing it and stop dodging the issue.[/QUOTE]
Da Space core details practically nothing besides that I made alot of threads recently. I've already tackled his other point on the hunger strike and even he concludes none of this is banworthy.
Also his point that it is all "minor" news is not a solid accusation. That is completely subjective, considering some people don't find news on Marvel Comic series to be major, or a zoo honoring some walrus.
Also why is it the news has to fit my political narrative? Do I have a political narrative when I post on a German girl put on summary execution or a Georgia Tech student being shot. Are people incapable of making their own opinions?
If you are just going to get pissed that I post a news source like when the UK bomber is identified as a Syrian Refugee, then yes, I will keep posting those news stories, because in my mind it shouldn't matter who posted it.
Hey does adding someone to your ignore list hide their threads as well?
[QUOTE=wauterboi;52697043]Cool, so now you know your ultimate defense against Tudd: ignore him[/QUOTE]
I'm sure ignoring that cancer you have will work out well.
[QUOTE=Tudd;52697145]Da Space core details practically nothing besides that I made alot of threads recently. I've already tackled his other point on the hunger strike and even he concludes none of this is banworthy.
Also his point that it is all "minor" news is not a solid accusation. That is completely subjective, considering some people don't find news on Marvel Comic series to be major, or a zoo honoring some walrus.
Also why is it the news has to fit my political narrative? Do I have a political narrative when I post on a German girl put on summary execution or a Georgia Tech student being shot. Are people incapable of making their own opinions?
If you are just going to get pissed that I post a news source like when the UK bomber is identified as a Syrian Refugee, then yes, I will keep posting those news stories, because in my mind it shouldn't matter who posted it.[/QUOTE]
You're still missing the point. Nothing is wrong with the news being shared, it's that YOU'RE sharing the news. How can you not understand after the past year of a majority of Facepunch complaining about your political views that you cherry picking news that fits your narrative is suspicious?
Seriously. If you're creating threads in SH, start varying your topics you want to share. When all you share is shit that a common conservative/right person would, it gets annoying to everyone - including your own kind.
[editline]19th September 2017[/editline]
[QUOTE=Trekintosh;52697177]Hey does adding someone to your ignore list hide their threads as well?[/QUOTE]
No. There are user scripts that remove the posts, but not the actual thread.
Snip, this had less to do with tudd's posting and more to do with his shitty opinions
Honestly, if someone writes a userscript that allows threads to be hidden from specific users like how you can hide Subreddits in /r/all with RES, I'll happily use that and let Tudd sit in his own world.
[QUOTE=Teddybeer;52697291]Probably could use a cleanup.
[/QUOTE]
webkit only lol
Tudd, the next time you come into this thread to revel in the attention and make sure that everybody is talking about Special Tudd, you're going to the fucking cooler. You're every bit as responsible for this bullshit as anybody else, because you're always hot on the heels of any mention of your name to make sure that people keep talking about you. Piss off with it or you're outa here.
Everybody else: shut the fuck up about Tudd. We get it -- he's a shameless propagandist and slimy lil' goblinoid. We've all said it a bajiillion times. The cycle's getting tired. Quit giving him attention to feed off of, or you're getting banned.
'Bout to request that Tudd be an Auto-Ban word for god's sake.
[QUOTE=CunningHam;52697304]casual reminder, previously Hezzy's unbanned Tudd and chastised the mods for banning him in the first place.[/QUOTE]
I think hezzy and postal just keep him around to see how much people bitch and whine about him at this point if the april fools event was any indication
Myon, I deleted your post since you were prolly writing it at the same time as me, but I'm serious. I'll shoot to kill! I mean it! I've got a full chamber of Tudd bans loaded up and ready to fire. This is far warning: if you choose to ignore it you're getting a lengthy time-out.
[highlight]The Tudd Talk Show is cancelled. Violators will be purged.[/highlight]
good, now we can talk about the real issues.
when is doug gonna be a mod?
BDA could you please stop vandalizing my city I've been seeing this shit tag around a lot of times in the last few weeks, thx
[img]http://www.infranken.de/storage/image/2/0/3/3/1753302_cms2image-fixedwidth-900x0_1pbCVs_BxA17H.jpg[/img]
Holy shit I'm glad I refreshed the page before I posted :v:
[QUOTE=Killuah;52696240]Most of us have it adblocked anyway[/QUOTE]
Wait,you can adblock avatars?
I know that I'm kind of new,but I had no idea you could do that.
[QUOTE=Killuah;52697429]BDA could you please stop vandalizing my city I've been seeing this shit tag around a lot of times in the last few weeks, thx
[img]http://www.infranken.de/storage/image/2/0/3/3/1753302_cms2image-fixedwidth-900x0_1pbCVs_BxA17H.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Fuck up my tag and I'll fuck up your life.
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;52697512]Fuck up my tag and I'll fuck up your life.[/QUOTE]
I'm reporting this mod abuse to Garry; this cannot stand! :frown:
[QUOTE=weyu6572;52697490]Wait,you can adblock avatars?
I know that I'm kind of new,but I had no idea you could do that.[/QUOTE]
Yep. I do it on all my portable devices towards certain animaymay tiddy avatars so that people will stop asking me what the fuck I'm looking at.
[sp]Yes I have been asked if I was looking at porn or something before thanks to you nerds :/ [/sp]
[QUOTE=TheMrFailz;52697567]Yep. I do it on all my portable devices towards certain animaymay tiddy avatars so that people will stop asking me what the fuck I'm looking at.
[sp]Yes I have been asked if I was looking at porn or something before thanks to you nerds :/ [/sp][/QUOTE]
Working as planned.
I think we should reactivate Toxx Trackr, at least for the Valve Games Section. It would definitely help cut down on the spam of awful ''toxxes'' like
":toxx: UPDATE THIS WEEK OR I GIVE AWAY TF2 ITEMS :toxx:"
which is nearly constant every week.
Would it be better or worse if Polidicks had a rule that the article title must match that of the article? On the off occasion I see a title that's been crafted to misrepresent the information in the article but I'm not sure if it'd wind up being an absolutely terrible rule
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;52697512]Fuck up my tag and I'll fuck up your life.[/QUOTE]
You ain't shit toy, you can't get up like the rest of the crew.
[editline]19th September 2017[/editline]
This is the world Marc Ecko wanted I think.
[editline]19th September 2017[/editline]
[QUOTE=Snickerdoodle;52697810]Would it be better or worse if Polidicks had a rule that the article title must match that of the article? On the off occasion I see a title that's been crafted to misrepresent the information in the article but I'm not sure if it'd wind up being an absolutely terrible rule[/QUOTE]
I almost always exclusively use the original article headline for the thread itself, I would think making it a rule in Polidicks would be good. You'd have less people trying to subtly 'trigger' each other with clever thread titles at the minimum.
[QUOTE=Snickerdoodle;52697810]Would it be better or worse if Polidicks had a rule that the article title must match that of the article? On the off occasion I see a title that's been crafted to misrepresent the information in the article but I'm not sure if it'd wind up being an absolutely terrible rule[/QUOTE]
Editorialized titles are already bannable, though there's some liberty with how much you can change.
[QUOTE=Sir Whoopsalot;52697852]Editorialized titles are already bannable, though there's some liberty with how much you can change.[/QUOTE]
The smallest change that I've seen that can still upset users is the insertion of "" around words or phrases (where it wasn't in the original title) to make something seem like less of a big deal or a non issue.
[QUOTE=TheMrFailz;52697567][sp]Yes I have been asked if I was looking at porn or something before thanks to you nerds :/ [/sp][/QUOTE]
just say yes
[QUOTE=Snickerdoodle;52697810]Would it be better or worse if Polidicks had a rule that the article title must match that of the article? On the off occasion I see a title that's been crafted to misrepresent the information in the article but I'm not sure if it'd wind up being an absolutely terrible rule[/QUOTE]
Sometimes you just have to change the title, to make it fit. Or sometimes the original article title itself is bad/vague, even if the content itself is good.
Just having editorialized titles being bannable is probably fine, I mean it's usually pretty obvious.
[QUOTE=Snickerdoodle;52697810]Would it be better or worse if Polidicks had a rule that the article title must match that of the article? On the off occasion I see a title that's been crafted to misrepresent the information in the article but I'm not sure if it'd wind up being an absolutely terrible rule[/QUOTE]
We already ban for editorializing titles. If you see a misleading title, report it.
[QUOTE=Jelman;52696562]stop fucking feeding him you idiots.
ignore his dumb ass and be on with your day[/QUOTE]
The worst part is all of this is just the fuel and attention he wants.
I shut up about the guy forever ago.
Can we all just do the same
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("C'mon dude. Read." - Pascall))[/highlight]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.