Forums Discussion v3 - Post about Tudd and win a 1 month ban
5,023 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Marbalo;52777569]PUI shouldn't even be bannable tbh.
All posters must have the freedoms to post under whichever mind-fucking soul-breaking narcotics they can get their hands on, wherever, whenever.[/QUOTE]
People only get banned for PUI under the following conditions;
They post about how "lol i'm druuuunk" or "lol i'm so high rn" and therefore make a shit post
They post incoherent nonsense and therefore make a shit post
[QUOTE=Kiwi;52778005]Yes. You're off topic.[/QUOTE]
Never said anything about doing it in that particular thread. Just somewhere like "shit that gets you mad" and such.
It's not even really the ratings, it's the utter lack of substantive feedback when someone consistently disagrees with a certain stance but they never see fit to actually elaborate or contribute to it.
I didn't realise PUI is a serious thing, I thought crabasket was doing a joke ban.
I'm high on life
[editline]13th October 2017[/editline]
Jk, I don't do anything but work and sleep
[QUOTE=Marbalo;52777569]PUI shouldn't even be bannable tbh.
All posters must have the freedoms to post under whichever mind-fucking soul-breaking narcotics they can get their hands on, wherever, whenever.[/QUOTE]
pui isn't bannable. i've made over 20 thousand posts while high, all you gotta do is not tell any- wait shit
smarked x1
[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;52778201]pui isn't bannable. [B]i've made over 20 thousand posts while high[/B], all you gotta do is not tell any- wait shit[/QUOTE]And he states this on the most moderated thread on the forum :v:.
If you're not an idiot while drunk, high or sober for that matter, you won't be banned
Pretty simple tbh
It's still like saying to a cop "I was drink driving all these times"
[QUOTE=RoboChimp;52778331]It's still like saying to a cop "I was drink driving all these times"[/QUOTE]
They really can't do anything though unless you were caught in the moment with a blood alcohol rating above the legal limit. They won't be happy with you but they can't do shit
Do Golds out weight Blues yet?
[QUOTE=RoboChimp;52778515]Do Golds out weight Blues yet?[/QUOTE]
all-time or active members?
Active members
[QUOTE=RoboChimp;52778515]Do Golds out weight Blues yet?[/QUOTE]
Cobalt (Blue) has a density of 8.86 grams per cubic centimeter while gold has a density of 19.32 grams per cubic centimeter, making gold 2.18 times more dense
This means that for the weights come out equal, roughly 1/3 of users need to be gold
[QUOTE=TrafficMan;52778605]Cobalt (Blue) has a density of 8.86 grams per cubic centimeter while gold has a density of 19.32 grams per cubic centimeter, making gold 2.18 times more dense
This means that for the weights come out equal, roughly 1/3 of users need to be gold[/QUOTE]
We're talking about users here, not the elements they represent.
Gold users spend far more time in front of their computers and shitposting than do blue members. One can likely assume that their body weight is significantly influenced by this variable. I would go one step further and assume that the curve is effectively controlled by a function of time and post count, wherein a rapid shitposter gold who has achieved the rank within a year or two of membership can be expected to be morbidly obese compared to long-term golds who only achieved the rank due to trickle accumulation. Blue members fall into two categories- those who post rapidly and will soon become golds, and those who post slowly and may never achieve it. The former group may become obese, but will later gain even more mass as golds. The latter group will not accumulate mass, and will be rendered harmless like a brown dwarf star.
The logical conclusion here is that the combined mass of all gold users is likely far greater than that of the blue userbase.
[QUOTE=BackSapper;52777816]I've PUI'd before. The thing is [del]the be sensible and responsible with what you say and not be a complete jackass.[/del] to not mention you've had a drink.[/QUOTE]
Haven't had a drink since March... I am unsure whether my shitposting has increased or decreased.
[QUOTE=RoboChimp;52778515]Do Golds out weight Blues yet?[/QUOTE]I outweigh most members, but that's only by body mass.
[QUOTE=Sgt Doom;52778828]I outweigh most members, but that's only by body mass.[/QUOTE]Heavy baby
[QUOTE=TrafficMan;52778605]Cobalt (Blue) has a density of 8.86 grams per cubic centimeter while gold has a density of 19.32 grams per cubic centimeter, making gold 2.18 times more dense
This means that for the weights come out equal, roughly 1/3 of users need to be gold[/QUOTE]
Cobalt isn't blue. The only blue-tinted metal I can think of offhand is in fact also the densest: osmium has a density of 22.59.
Blues still outweigh golds.
[QUOTE=UberMunchkin;52778930]You must be thirsty[/QUOTE]
I'm aquiring energy from the sun..
It sustains me.
I'm only sustained by gruel and the occasional blood sacrifice.
[QUOTE=Bradyns;52778946]I'm aquiring energy from the sun..
It sustains me.[/QUOTE]Are you a sentient plant?
WAYT is leaking again...
[QUOTE=Mifil;52779294]WAYT is leaking again...[/QUOTE]
No-one sealed the leak
[QUOTE=kimr120;52779334]No-one sealed the leak[/QUOTE]
[t]https://thumb9.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/1310755/127982045/stock-photo-man-with-welding-helmet-welding-steel-127982045.jpg[/t]
Weld it up
And then encase it in concrete
[QUOTE=Headhumpy;52778917]Cobalt isn't blue. The only blue-tinted metal I can think of offhand is in fact also the densest: osmium has a density of 22.59.
Blues still outweigh golds.[/QUOTE]
Osmium barely counts as blue. You may as well call zinc blue.
Really the best blue I can think of on the periodic table is xenon in a discharge tube. But that's pretty problematic, as xenon is a noble gas, and noble is not a title blue users deserve.
Who said it has to be a pure element anyways? Why not blue-dyed lithium? It's like a 40th as dense as gold is. And most of all, it'd explain their reactivity pretty well.
[QUOTE=thelurker1234;52779487]Osmium barely counts as blue. You may as well call zinc blue.
Really the best blue I can think of on the periodic table is xenon in a discharge tube. But that's pretty problematic, as xenon is a noble gas, and noble is not a title blue users deserve.
Who said it has to be a pure element anyways? Why not blue-dyed lithium? It's like a 40th as dense as gold is. And most of all, it'd explain their reactivity pretty well.[/QUOTE]
If you dissolve lithium in liquid ammonia with crypt compounds, then an electron from each lithium will dissolve and give a most fantastic blue, and electrons weigh virtually nothing.
You could also substitute lithium for sodium
[IMG]https://d1w9csuen3k837.cloudfront.net/Pictures/480xany/5/1/0/114510_solvatedelectronspaveljungwirth_291341.jpg[/IMG]
You guys are a bunch of nerds.
[sp]I love Science please don't hurt me I'm fragile[/sp]
Stop using minerals as measurement for density and use the skulls for each individual member and tally up an average for both blues and gold, and call it duncity.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.